Claudia Miranda-Castillo1, Bob Woods, Martin Orrell. 1. Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London and Facultad de Medicina, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the U.K. about 141,460 people with dementia (PWD) live alone. They are at risk of social isolation and inadequate social and medical supervision. The aims of this study were to identify the needs of PWD living alone and to compare the needs of PWD living alone versus those living with others. It was predicted that PWD living alone would have significantly more unmet needs than those living with others. METHODS: 152 PWD were interviewed about their cognitive status and quality of life (QoL); and 128 informal carers were interviewed about the PWD's QoL, social networks, behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD), functional status, and services used. For 24 PWD no carer was available. Carers were also interviewed about their own symptoms of depression, anxiety, burden, and satisfaction. Researchers rated PWD's needs. One-third of the PWD (50) were living alone. RESULTS: PWD living alone had significantly more unmet needs (M = 3.9, s.d. 3.1) than those living with others (M = 2.0, s.d. 2.0) (U = 1578, p < 0.01) particularly in the areas of looking after home (chi2 = 17.23, p < 0.001), food (chi2 = 13.91, p < 0.002), self-care (chi2 = 10.23, p < 0.002) and accidental self-harm (chi2 = 16.51, p < 0.001). The most frequent unmet needs were daytime activities (27, 54.0%), company (26, 52.0%), psychological distress (22, 44.0%), eyesight/hearing (16, 32.0%), and accidental self-harm (16, 32.0%). CONCLUSION: PWD living alone are a vulnerable group who are at increased risk for unmet social, environmental, psychological and medical needs. This study illustrates the need to identify these individuals and to make provisions among social service agencies to monitor their well-being regularly and provide a higher level of support when needs are identified.
BACKGROUND: In the U.K. about 141,460 people with dementia (PWD) live alone. They are at risk of social isolation and inadequate social and medical supervision. The aims of this study were to identify the needs of PWD living alone and to compare the needs of PWD living alone versus those living with others. It was predicted that PWD living alone would have significantly more unmet needs than those living with others. METHODS: 152 PWD were interviewed about their cognitive status and quality of life (QoL); and 128 informal carers were interviewed about the PWD's QoL, social networks, behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD), functional status, and services used. For 24 PWD no carer was available. Carers were also interviewed about their own symptoms of depression, anxiety, burden, and satisfaction. Researchers rated PWD's needs. One-third of the PWD (50) were living alone. RESULTS: PWD living alone had significantly more unmet needs (M = 3.9, s.d. 3.1) than those living with others (M = 2.0, s.d. 2.0) (U = 1578, p < 0.01) particularly in the areas of looking after home (chi2 = 17.23, p < 0.001), food (chi2 = 13.91, p < 0.002), self-care (chi2 = 10.23, p < 0.002) and accidental self-harm (chi2 = 16.51, p < 0.001). The most frequent unmet needs were daytime activities (27, 54.0%), company (26, 52.0%), psychological distress (22, 44.0%), eyesight/hearing (16, 32.0%), and accidental self-harm (16, 32.0%). CONCLUSION: PWD living alone are a vulnerable group who are at increased risk for unmet social, environmental, psychological and medical needs. This study illustrates the need to identify these individuals and to make provisions among social service agencies to monitor their well-being regularly and provide a higher level of support when needs are identified.
Authors: Roy Yaari; Geri R Hall; Helle Brand; James D Seward; Anna D Burke; Adam S Fleisher; Jan Dougherty; Pierre N Tariot Journal: Prim Care Companion CNS Disord Date: 2012-02-23
Authors: Quincy M Samus; Betty Smith Black; Diane Bovenkamp; Michael Buckley; Christopher Callahan; Karen Davis; Laura N Gitlin; Nancy Hodgson; Deirdre Johnston; Helen C Kales; Michele Karel; John Jay Kenney; Shari M Ling; Maï Panchal; Melissa Reuland; Amber Willink; Constantine G Lyketsos Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Ryan D Edwards; Willa D Brenowitz; Elena Portacolone; Ken E Covinsky; Andrew Bindman; M Maria Glymour; Jacqueline M Torres Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Ann Kolanowski; Richard H Fortinsky; Margaret Calkins; Davangere P Devanand; Elizabeth Gould; Tamar Heller; Nancy A Hodgson; Helen C Kales; Jeffrey Kaye; Constantine Lyketsos; Barbara Resnick; Melanie Schicker; Sheryl Zimmerman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Claudia Miranda-Castillo; Bob Woods; Kumari Galboda; Sabu Oomman; Charles Olojugba; Martin Orrell Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Elena Portacolone; Julene K Johnson; Kenneth E Covinsky; Jodi Halpern; Robert L Rubinstein Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Stephanie K Ennis; Eric B Larson; Louis Grothaus; Christian D Helfrich; Steven Balch; Elizabeth A Phelan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 5.128