Literature DB >> 20214439

Novel ultrasonic device to measure the distance from the bottom of the osteotome to various anatomic landmarks.

Eli E Machtei1, Hadar Zigdon, Liran Levin, Micha Peled.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to intraoperatively measure the distance from the bottom of the osteotome to the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) and maxillary sinus floor using a novel ultrasonic device and to compare the measurements to those using conventional radiographs.
METHODS: Patients scheduled for dental implant placement in the posterior regions were recruited for this pilot study. Mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated, and a recipient site was initiated using a standardized 2-mm-diameter pilot drill. The distance from the bottom of the osteotome to the IAC and maxillary sinus floor was assessed using a newly developed ultrasonic device and compared to a standard panoramic radiograph that was used to measure the same residual distance from the bottom of the drill.
RESULTS: Fourteen consecutive patients (21 implants) were enrolled. Eleven implants were placed in posterior mandibles, and 10 implants were placed in posterior maxillae. The mean +/- SE radiographic distance from the apex of the pilot drill to the nearest cortical bone was 5.64 +/- 0.51 mm, which was very similar to the distance measured by the ultrasonic device (5.22 +/- 0.37 mm; P = 0.341). In posterior mandibles (n = 11), the distances were 5.18 +/-0.61 mm (radiographic) and 5.26 +/- 0.61 mm (ultrasonic), which were not statistically significant (P = 0.593). A very strong positive correlation was observed between the two measurements in mandibles (r = 0.967; P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The results of this in vivo study support the value of this ultrasonic system in measuring the residual osseous depth from the bottom of the osteotome to the roof of the IAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20214439     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  8 in total

Review 1.  Review on the applications of ultrasonography in dentomaxillofacial region.

Authors:  Şehrazat Evirgen; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Updates on ultrasound research in implant dentistry: a systematic review of potential clinical indications.

Authors:  Vaishnavi Bhaskar; Hsun-Liang Chan; Mark MacEachern; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.

Authors:  L Vazquez; Y Nizamaldin; C Combescure; R Nedir; M Bischof; D M Dohan Ehrenfest; J-P Carrel; U C Belser
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  New US device versus imaging US to assess tumor-in-brain.

Authors:  Jacob Halevy-Politch; Menashe Zaaroor; Alon Sinai; Marius Constantinescu
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2020-08-05

5.  Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration.

Authors:  Hsun-Liang Chan; Oliver D Kripfgans
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  Visualization techniques of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN): a narrative review.

Authors:  Annelies Weckx; Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje; Yi Sun; Reinhilde Jacobs; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Impact of Digital Panoramic Radiograph Magnification on Vertical Measurement Accuracy.

Authors:  Marc El Hage; Jean-Pierre Bernard; Christophe Combescure; Lydia Vazquez
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-10-19

8.  Comparison of ultrasound imaging and cone-beam computed tomography for examination of the alveolar bone level: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kim-Cuong T Nguyen; Camila Pachêco-Pereira; Neelambar R Kaipatur; June Cheung; Paul W Major; Lawrence H Le
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.