Literature DB >> 20213714

On the prognostic value of survival models with application to gene expression signatures.

T Hielscher1, M Zucknick, W Werft, A Benner.   

Abstract

As part of the validation of any statistical model, it is a good statistical practice to quantify the prediction accuracy and the amount of prognostic information represented by the model; this includes gene expression signatures derived from high-dimensional microarray data. Several approaches exist for right-censored survival data measuring the gain in prognostic information compared with established clinical parameters or biomarkers in terms of explained variation or explained randomness. They are either model-based or use estimates of prediction accuracy.As these measures differ in their underlying mechanisms, they vary in their interpretation, assumptions and properties, in particular in how they deal with the presence of censoring. It remains unclear, under what conditions and to what extent they are comparable. We present a comparison of several common measures and illustrate their behaviour in high-dimensional situations in simulation examples as well as in applications to real gene expression microarray data sets. An overview of available software implementations in R is given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213714     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

1.  Collaborative Cross mice and their power to map host susceptibility to Aspergillus fumigatus infection.

Authors:  Caroline Durrant; Hanna Tayem; Binnaz Yalcin; James Cleak; Leo Goodstadt; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Richard Mott; Fuad A Iraqi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Three measures of explained variation for correlated survival data under the proportional hazards mixed-effects model.

Authors:  Gordon Honerkamp-Smith; Ronghui Xu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Joint Bayesian variable and graph selection for regression models with network-structured predictors.

Authors:  Christine B Peterson; Francesco C Stingo; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Validation of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system in 3,950 patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jae Kwang Yun; Geun Dong Lee; Hyeong Ryul Kim; Yong-Hee Kim; Dong Kwan Kim; Seung-Il Park; Sehoon Choi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Assessment of performance of survival prediction models for cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Hung-Chia Chen; Ralph L Kodell; Kuang Fu Cheng; James J Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Prediction of fracture risk in men: a cohort study.

Authors:  Liisa Byberg; Rolf Gedeborg; Thomas Cars; Johan Sundström; Lars Berglund; Lena Kilander; Håkan Melhus; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Sequential interim analyses of survival data in DNA microarray experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Leha; Tim Beissbarth; Klaus Jung
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Added predictive value of omics data: specific issues related to validation illustrated by two case studies.

Authors:  Riccardo De Bin; Tobias Herold; Anne-Laure Boulesteix
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.