Literature DB >> 20213592

Completion rate and diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: 1 vs. 2 frames per second.

Z Liao1, C Xu, Z-S Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Currently, the default frame rate for capsule endoscopy is usually set at 2 frames per second (fps). We postulated that setting the frame rate at 1 fps for the whole procedure would save battery life and increase the completion rate without compromising the diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was to compare the completion rates and diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy performed with frame rates of 1 fps and 2 fps. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The OMOM capsule endoscopy system was used. The procedure was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the frame rate was set at 1 fps in one group and at 2 fps in the other group for the whole procedure. The completion rate, total operating time, and diagnostic yield in the two groups were measured and compared.
RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were randomized to either the 1 fps group (n = 54) or the 2 fps group (control, n = 53). There was no significant difference in sex, age, indications, and gastric transit time between the two groups. The mean total operating time was significantly longer in the 1 fps group than in the 2 fps group (758 +/- 79 minutes vs. 456 +/- 67 minutes, P < 0.001). The completion rate and diagnostic yield were significantly higher in the 1 fps group than in the 2 fps group (96.2 % vs. 70.6 %, P < 0.001; 40.7 % vs. 18.9 %, P = 0.013, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Setting the frame rate of the capsule endoscope at 1 fps for the whole procedure increases the completion rate by prolonging the capsule's total operating time; the diagnostic yield does seem to be at least as high as with 2 fps. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213592     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

Review 1.  New vision in video capsule endoscopy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Laurel R Fisher; William L Hasler
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Capsule Endoscopy to Detect Normally Positioned Duodenal Papilla: Performance Comparison of SB and SB2.

Authors:  Sanghoon Park; Hoon Jai Chun; Bora Keum; Yeon Seok Seo; Yong Sik Kim; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hong Sik Lee; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim; Ho Sang Ryu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Magnetic Steering of Capsule Endoscopy Improves Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Completion Rate.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Luo; Jun Pan; Yi-Zhi Chen; Xi Jiang; Wen-Bin Zou; Yang-Yang Qian; Wei Zhou; Xiao Liu; Zhao-Shen Li; Zhuan Liao
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 4.  Current Status and Research into Overcoming Limitations of Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Won Gun Kwack; Yun Jeong Lim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28

5.  A pilot trial of Convolution Neural Network for automatic retention-monitoring of capsule endoscopes in the stomach and duodenal bulb.

Authors:  Tao Gan; Shuaicheng Liu; Jinlin Yang; Bing Zeng; Li Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effectiveness of Improved Use of Chewing Gum During Capsule Endoscopy in Decreasing Gastric Transit Time: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Liang Huang; Yue Hu; Fang Chen; Shan Liu; Bin Lu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.