Literature DB >> 20213591

Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions.

A Moss1, M J Bourke, K Tran, C Godfrey, G McKay, A P Chandra, S Sharma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: En bloc resection is preferred for colonic laterally spreading tumors, but is limited to 20 mm with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) using normal saline submucosal injection. Our aims were to compare the efficacy and safety of circumferential submucosal incision prior to EMR (CSI-EMR) versus conventional EMR for en bloc resection of artificial lesions 40 x 40 mm in size using submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin in a porcine colon model. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two areas of normal rectosigmoid mucosa measuring 40 x 40 mm were marked with soft coagulation for en bloc resection in each of 10 pigs. By alternate allocation, one was removed with conventional snare-based EMR following submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin. The other was circumferentially incised using an insulated-tip knife, followed by submucosal succinylated gelatin injection followed by EMR of the isolated area. All procedures were performed by a single endoscopist with significant experience of EMR but none of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Euthanasia and colectomy were performed on day 10. Specimens and ex vivo colon resection sites were examined by a specialist gastrointestinal histopathologist blinded to the technique used.
RESULTS: En bloc excision rates were 70 % for CSI-EMR vs. 0 % for conventional EMR ( P = 0.016). The median number of resections was 1 (interquartile range, IQR: 1-2) for CSI-EMR vs. 4 (3 - 6) for EMR ( P < 0.001). Mean specimen dimensions were 50 x 43 mm for CSI-EMR vs. 37 x 32 mm for EMR ( P = 0.001). Overall procedure duration (mean +/- SD) was 30.3 +/- 19.8 minutes for CSI-EMR vs. 12.4 +/- 6.8 minutes ( P = 0.003) for EMR. The mean duration of the final 5 CSI-EMRs was 17 minutes, with a statistically significant learning effect R = -0.7, P = 0.025. No perforations or bleeding occurred. All animals were euthanased on day 10. Histologically, CSI-EMR resulted in larger specimens and deeper submucosal resections.
CONCLUSIONS: CSI-EMR with submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin is safe and superior to conventional EMR, consistently resulting in en bloc resections larger than 50 x 40 mm. With experience, total procedure duration is comparable. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213591     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  16 in total

1.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and associated techniques.

Authors:  Christopher-J Fyock; Peter-V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort.

Authors:  Yoji Takeuchi; Hiroyasu Iishi; Shinji Tanaka; Yutaka Saito; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yasushi Sano; Takashi Hisabe; Naohisa Yahagi; Yusuke Saitoh; Masahiro Igarashi; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Hiroo Yamano; Seiji Shimizu; Osamu Tsuruta; Yuji Inoue; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hisashi Nakamura; Takahiro Fujii; Noriya Uedo; Toshio Shimokawa; Hideki Ishikawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Impact of formal training in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Tanimoto; M Lourdes Guerrero; Yoshinori Morita; Jonathan Aguirre-Valadez; Elisa Gomez; Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez; Jose A Estradas-Trujillo; Miguel A Valdovinos; Luis F Uscanga; Rikiya Fujita
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

4.  Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding.

Authors:  Peter John Basford; Regi George; Emma Nixon; Tehreem Chaudhuri; Rob Mead; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.

Authors:  Dae Young Cheung; Soo Kyoung Choi; Hyung-Keun Kim; Sung Soo Kim; Hiun-Suk Chae; Kyung Jin Seo; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Improving quality measures in colonoscopy and its therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Factors Predictive of Complete Excision of Large Colorectal Neoplasia Using Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A KASID Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Yunho Jung; Jong Wook Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Hoon Sup Koo; Sun-Jin Boo; Jun Lee; Young Hwangbo; Yoon Mi Jeen; Hyun Gun Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Selective tissue elevation by pressure for endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenoma: first clinical trial.

Authors:  S Belle; P H Collet; M Szyrach; P Ströbel; S Post; M D Enderle; G Kähler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision of duodenal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Yuzo Otaki; Kiyoaki Homma; Yoshitakata Nawata; Kazuomi Imaizumi; Shigeru Arai
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16

10.  Endoscopic treatment of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Retrospective analysis of a single center technique and results.

Authors:  Flavio Acquistapace; F Maternini; L Snider; O Bellini; P Moglia; P Capretti
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.