Literature DB >> 20213460

Percutaneous laparoscopic assisted gastrostomy (PLAG)--a new technique for cases of pharyngoesophageal obstruction.

Ulrich Bolder1, Marcus N Scherer, Thorsten Schmidt, Matthias Hornung, Hans-Jürgen Schlitt, Peter Vogel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferable method to provide enteral nutrition for a longer time period. Safe placement of a PEG tube requires passage of the esophagus and transillumination of the stomach through the abdominal wall. Surgical placement of a PEG tube has been shown to be feasible although the local complication rate ranges above the endoscopic procedure. We are presenting a new technique (percutaneous laparoscopically assisted gastrostomy, PLAG) to provide enteral access for patients with pharyngoesophageal obstruction not suitable for PEG placement.
METHODS: We have developed a laparoscopic method that allows full control of the stoma location at the anterior gastric wall. The tube has a deployable bumper mechanism, which can be inserted through a minimal gastric incision. Combined with the fixation by transcutaneous sutures, the risk for leakage or dislodgement is low.
RESULTS: Fifty-one PLAGs were inserted in 45 male and six female patients suffering from pharyngoesophageal obstruction due to malignancy. Patients were referred after unsuccessful endoscopic PEG placement (n = 39) or received their PLAG when they underwent staging laparoscopy (n = 12). Success rate was 96.2%. No procedure-related mortality was observed. Infectious complications occurred in three (5.9%) cases. In five patients, minor leaks were managed conservatively (n = 4) or required relaparoscopy (n = 1) and placement of an additional suture (overall complication rate of 15.8%, n = 8). Nutritional goals were reached after 7.8 ± 2.3 days.
CONCLUSION: PLAG is a safe and easy procedure. It can well be used to provide enteral access for patients with pharyngoesophageal obstruction not suitable for endoscopic PEG placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20213460     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0612-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  34 in total

1.  The safety and feasibility of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.

Authors:  Takamitsu Sasaki; Daisuke Fukumori; Koutaro Sakai; Masayuki Sato; Hitoshi Ohmori; Fumio Yamamoto
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition--percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

Authors:  Chr Löser; G Aschl; X Hébuterne; E M H Mathus-Vliegen; M Muscaritoli; Y Niv; H Rollins; P Singer; R H Skelly
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 3.  Interventional radiology techniques for provision of enteral feeding.

Authors:  M F Given; J J Hanson; M J Lee
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Percutaneous endoscopic, radiological and surgical gastrostomy tubes: a comparison study in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  I K Rustom; A Jebreel; M Tayyab; R J A England; N D Stafford
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Establishing radiological percutaneous gastrostomy with balloon-retained tubes as an alternative to endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy in patients with tumours of the head and neck or oesophagus.

Authors:  H-P Dinkel; K T Beer; P Zbären; J Triller
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). 8 years of clinical experience in 232 patients.

Authors:  W Amann; H J Mischinger; A Berger; G Rosanelli; W Schweiger; G Werkgartner; J Fruhwirth; H Hauser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Irma Cruz; Jay J Mamel; Patrick G Brady; Meg Cass-Garcia
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Gastrostomy by various techniques: evaluation of indications, outcome, and complications.

Authors:  P Möller; C G Lindberg; T Zilling
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Percutaneous radiologic, surgical endoscopic, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy: comparative study and cost analysis.

Authors:  J M Barkmeier; S O Trerotola; E A Wiebke; S Sherman; V J Harris; J J Snidow; M S Johnson; W J Rogers; X H Zhou
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Experiences with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  C N Gutt; S Held; V Paolucci; A Encke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices.

Authors:  Anand Rajan; Peerapol Wangrattanapranee; Jonathan Kessler; Trilokesh Dey Kidambi; James H Tabibian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.