Literature DB >> 9214323

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). 8 years of clinical experience in 232 patients.

W Amann1, H J Mischinger, A Berger, G Rosanelli, W Schweiger, G Werkgartner, J Fruhwirth, H Hauser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is now a standard method for providing long-term enteral nutrition in patients who are unable to swallow. The aim of our study was to document clinical data that would allow prediction of a possible complicated clinical course.
METHODS: The study was carried out retrospectively. Clinical data of patients having received a PEG tube by a single endoscopic technique were analyzed.
RESULTS: Some 5. 17% of 232 patients showed complications requiring surgery including a mortality rate of 0.43%. Patients with complications had a significantly lower body mass index and there was a significantly higher complication rate in patients having obstructive malignancies compared with benign diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: Low body mass index and advanced malignancies are predictors for complications after PEG application. Early installation should help prevent further nutritional deterioration and the related risk of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9214323     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  E Eleftheriadis; K Kotzampassi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective, randomised, double blind trial of prophylaxis with single dose of co-amoxiclav before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  G Preclik; S Grüne; H G Leser; J Lebherz; W Heldwein; K Machka; A Holstege; W V Kern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-02

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with T-fasteners obviates the need for emergent replacement after early tube dislodgement.

Authors:  P Timratana; K El-Hayek; H Shimizu; M Kroh; B Chand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Acute hemorrhage following transhepatic PEG tube placement.

Authors:  Travis F Wiggins; R Kaplan; M H DeLegge
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Elective bedside surgery in critically injured patients is safe and cost-effective.

Authors:  T L Van Natta; J A Morris; V A Eddy; C R Nunn; E J Rutherford; D Neuzil; J M Jenkins; J G Bass
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Investigation and prediction of enteral nutrition problems after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Shiro Yokohama; Masaru Aoshima; Yukiomi Nakade; Junya Shindo; Junichi Maruyama; Masashi Yoneda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Propofol-Based Sedation Does Not Increase Rate of Complication during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Procedure.

Authors:  Somchai Amornyotin; Wiyada Chalayonnavin; Siriporn Kongphlay
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 10.  A descriptive review of the factors contributing to nutritional compromise in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Martin R Chasen; Ravi Bhargava
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.