Literature DB >> 20212990

Allocation of health care resources in the neonatal and perinatal area -CPS Symposium 1996.

D McMillan1, S Lee, M Serediak, J Finn, S Saigal, C Walker.   

Abstract

There have been publically expressed concerns about the costs and allocation of neonatal and perinatal health care resources in Canada and elsewhere for the past 15 years. This paper reports information from a symposium held during the 1996 Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) annual meeting sponsored by the CPS Section on Perinatal Medicine. Experts in perinatal epidemiology, health care economics, public policy and finance, and consumer perspectives on the outcomes of neonatal and perinatal intensive care explored the following questions: How should the need for health care resources in the neonatal and perinatal area be objectively determined? When there are competing needs between the maternal-newborn area and other areas, how should these be rationalized? What evidence should be used (or should be available) to support the present use of resources? What evidence should be available (or is needed) to change or introduce new uses of resources? The conclusions indicated that there are no generally accepted methods to determine the allocation of health care resources but that considerations need to include population characteristics, desired outcomes, achievable results, values, ethics, legalities, cost-benefit analyses and political objectives. Information from families and adolescents who required the use of high technology and/or high cost programs will contribute individual, family and societal values that complement cost-efficacy analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocation of resources; Health care funding; Neonatal care

Year:  1999        PMID: 20212990      PMCID: PMC2828227          DOI: 10.1093/pch/4.1.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1205-7088            Impact factor:   2.253


  21 in total

1.  Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence.

Authors:  S Saigal; D Feeny; P Rosenbaum; W Furlong; E Burrows; B Stoskopf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Prioritization of health care services. A progress report by the Oregon Health Services Commission.

Authors:  H D Klevit; A C Bates; T Castanares; E P Kirk; P R Sipes-Metzler; R Wopat
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-05

3.  Impact of very low birth weight infants on the family and its relationship to parental attitudes.

Authors:  S K Lee; P L Penner; M Cox
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 5.  Neonatal intensive care and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  G W Chance
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The principles for family-centered neonatal care.

Authors:  H Harrison
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  M H Boyle; G W Torrance; J C Sinclair; S P Horwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Neonatal intensive care: is it worth it? Developmental sequelae of very low birthweight.

Authors:  J A Blackman
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.278

9.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in term newborns. A prospective cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R E Schumacher; D W Roloff; R Chapman; S Snedecor; R H Bartlett
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Womb rent.

Authors:  J J Pomerance; B S Schifrin; J L Meredith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.