Literature DB >> 20212129

Identifying the roles of race-based choice and chance in high school friendship network formation.

Sergio Currarini1, Matthew O Jackson, Paolo Pin.   

Abstract

Homophily, the tendency of people to associate with others similar to themselves, is observed in many social networks, ranging from friendships to marriages to business relationships, and is based on a variety of characteristics, including race, age, gender, religion, and education. We present a technique for distinguishing two primary sources of homophily: biases in the preferences of individuals over the types of their friends and biases in the chances that people meet individuals of other types. We use this technique to analyze racial patterns in friendship networks in a set of American high schools from the Add Health dataset. Biases in preferences and biases in meeting rates are both highly significant in these data, and both types of biases differ significantly across races. Asians and Blacks are biased toward interacting with their own race at rates >7 times higher than Whites, whereas Hispanics exhibit an intermediate bias in meeting opportunities. Asians exhibit the least preference bias, valuing friendships with other types 90% as much as friendships with Asians, whereas Blacks and Hispanics value friendships with other types 55% and 65% as much as same-type friendships, respectively, and Whites fall in between, valuing other-type friendships 75% as much as friendships with Whites. Meetings are significantly more biased in large schools (>1,000 students) than in small schools (<1,000 students), and biases in preferences exhibit some significant variation with the median household income levels in the counties surrounding the schools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20212129      PMCID: PMC2841897          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911793107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Empirical analysis of an evolving social network.

Authors:  Gueorgi Kossinets; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks.

Authors:  Steven M Goodreau; James A Kitts; Martina Morris
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2009-02

3.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks.

Authors:  Sinan Aral; Lev Muchnik; Arun Sundararajan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Model of genetic variation in human social networks.

Authors:  James H Fowler; Christopher T Dawes; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  25 in total

1.  Social selection and peer influence in an online social network.

Authors:  Kevin Lewis; Marco Gonzalez; Jason Kaufman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The limits of racial prejudice.

Authors:  Kevin Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Toward link predictability of complex networks.

Authors:  Linyuan Lü; Liming Pan; Tao Zhou; Yi-Cheng Zhang; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structural effect of size on interracial friendship.

Authors:  Siwei Cheng; Yu Xie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Culture-dependent strategies in coordination games.

Authors:  Matthew O Jackson; Yiqing Xing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Profile of Matthew O. Jackson.

Authors:  Sandeep Ravindran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Likelihoods for fixed rank nomination networks.

Authors:  Peter Hoff; Bailey Fosdick; Alex Volfovsky; Katherine Stovel
Journal:  Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press)       Date:  2013-12-01

8.  Identification with Multiple Groups in Multiethnic Middle Schools: What Predicts Social Ingroup Overlap?

Authors:  Casey A Knifsend; Ariana N Bell; Jaana Juvonen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-06-30

9.  Deconstructing bias in social preferences reveals groupy and not-groupy behavior.

Authors:  Rachel Kranton; Matthew Pease; Seth Sanders; Scott Huettel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Potential theory for directed networks.

Authors:  Qian-Ming Zhang; Linyuan Lü; Wen-Qiang Wang; Yu-Xiao Zhu; Tao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.