Literature DB >> 20211843

GPU computing for systems biology.

Lorenzo Dematté1, Davide Prandi.   

Abstract

The development of detailed, coherent, models of complex biological systems is recognized as a key requirement for integrating the increasing amount of experimental data. In addition, in-silico simulation of bio-chemical models provides an easy way to test different experimental conditions, helping in the discovery of the dynamics that regulate biological systems. However, the computational power required by these simulations often exceeds that available on common desktop computers and thus expensive high performance computing solutions are required. An emerging alternative is represented by general-purpose scientific computing on graphics processing units (GPGPU), which offers the power of a small computer cluster at a cost of approximately $400. Computing with a GPU requires the development of specific algorithms, since the programming paradigm substantially differs from traditional CPU-based computing. In this paper, we review some recent efforts in exploiting the processing power of GPUs for the simulation of biological systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211843     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbq006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  29 in total

1.  A critical assessment of information-guided protein-protein docking predictions.

Authors:  Edward S C Shih; Ming-Jing Hwang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  GPU-powered Shotgun Stochastic Search for Dirichlet process mixtures of Gaussian Graphical Models.

Authors:  Chiranjit Mukherjee; Abel Rodriguez
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  Integrative multicellular biological modeling: a case study of 3D epidermal development using GPU algorithms.

Authors:  Scott Christley; Briana Lee; Xing Dai; Qing Nie
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-08-09

4.  Factorized time-dependent distributions for certain multiclass queueing networks and an application to enzymatic processing networks.

Authors:  W H Mather; J Hasty; L S Tsimring; R J Williams
Journal:  Queueing Syst       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.216

5.  Least median of squares filtering of locally optimal point matches for compressible flow image registration.

Authors:  Edward Castillo; Richard Castillo; Benjamin White; Javier Rojo; Thomas Guerrero
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A framework for parameter estimation and model selection from experimental data in systems biology using approximate Bayesian computation.

Authors:  Juliane Liepe; Paul Kirk; Sarah Filippi; Tina Toni; Chris P Barnes; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  High performance transcription factor-DNA docking with GPU computing.

Authors:  Jiadong Wu; Bo Hong; Takako Takeda; Jun-Tao Guo
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  GPU-BLAST: using graphics processors to accelerate protein sequence alignment.

Authors:  Panagiotis D Vouzis; Nikolaos V Sahinidis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Protein-ligand binding region prediction (PLB-SAVE) based on geometric features and CUDA acceleration.

Authors:  Ying-Tsang Lo; Hsin-Wei Wang; Tun-Wen Pai; Wen-Shoung Tzou; Hui-Huang Hsu; Hao-Teng Chang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Modeling catalytic promiscuity in the alkaline phosphatase superfamily.

Authors:  Fernanda Duarte; Beat Anton Amrein; Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.