Literature DB >> 20211317

Evaluation of contraindications and efficacy of oral Beta blockade before computed tomographic coronary angiography.

Fleur R de Graaf1, Joanne D Schuijf, Joëlla E van Velzen, Lucia J Kroft, Albert de Roos, Allard Sieders, J Wouter Jukema, Martin J Schalij, Ernst E van der Wall, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

Multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTA) image quality is inversely related to the heart rate (HR). As a result beta-blocking medication is routinely administered before investigation. In the present study, the use, contraindications, and efficacy of prescan beta blockade with regard to HR reduction and CTA image quality were assessed. In 537 patients referred for CTA, the baseline HR and blood pressure were measured on arrival, and contraindications for beta blockade were noted. Unless contraindicated, a single dose of metoprolol was administered orally 1 hour before data acquisition in patients with a HR of > or =65 beats/min according to a predefined medication protocol. After 1 hour, the HR was remeasured. A total of 283 patients (53%) had a HR of > or =65 beats/min. In this group, beta blockade was contraindicated in 46 patients (16%). Metoprolol was administered to the remaining 237 patients. However, 26 patients (11%) received suboptimal (lower dose than prescribed by protocol) beta blockade because of contraindications. Of the 211 patients receiving optimal beta blockade, 57 (27%) did not achieve the target HR. Of the patients with contraindications to beta blockade, 43 (60%) did not achieve the target HR. Compared to patients with optimal HR control, those receiving no or suboptimal beta blockade because of contraindications had significantly fewer examinations of good image quality (40% vs 74%, p <0.001), and significantly more examinations of poor image quality (20% vs 6%, p <0.001). In conclusion, most patients require HR reduction before CTA. Contraindications to beta blockade are present in a substantial proportion of patients. This results in suboptimal HR control and image quality, indicating the need for alternative approaches for HR reduction. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211317     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  Effects of two different anesthetic protocols on 64-MDCT coronary angiography in dogs.

Authors:  Randi Drees; Rebecca A Johnson; Marie Pinkerton; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Jimmy H Saunders; Christopher J François
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 1.363

2.  Coronary CT angiography using the second-generation 320-detector row CT: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in various heart rates compared with the first-generation scanner.

Authors:  Nobuo Tomizawa; Eriko Maeda; Masaaki Akahane; Rumiko Torigoe; Shigeru Kiryu; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Safety of intravenous β-adrenoceptor blockers for computed tomographic coronary angiography.

Authors:  Benjamin Clayton; Vikram Raju; Carl Roobottom; Gareth Morgan-Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Failed heart rate control with oral metoprolol prior to coronary CT angiography: effect of additional intravenous metoprolol on heart rate, image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Juan; Elsie T Nguyen; Bernd J Wintersperger; Hadas Moshonov; Andrew M Crean; Djeven P Deva; Narinder S Paul; Felipe S Torres
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Impact of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy of second generation 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nitesh Nerlekar; Brian S Ko; Arthur Nasis; James D Cameron; Michael Leung; Adam J Brown; Dennis T L Wong; Philip J Ngu; John M Troupis; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

6.  Cost-effectiveness of optimal use of acute myocardial infarction treatments and impact on coronary heart disease mortality in China.

Authors:  Miao Wang; Andrew E Moran; Jing Liu; Pamela G Coxson; Paul A Heidenreich; Dongfeng Gu; Jiang He; Lee Goldman; Dong Zhao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-01-14

7.  Safety, Efficacy, and Dose Protocol of Metoprolol for Heart Rate Reduction in Pediatric Outpatients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography.

Authors:  Mariana de Oliveira Nunes; Dawn R Witt; Susan A Casey; Larissa I Stanberry; David J Caye; Bradford J Chu; B Jana Lindberg; John R Lesser; B Kelly Han
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  320-row CT: does beat-to-beat motion of the coronary arteries affect image quality?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; F R de Graaf; J E van Velzen; J W Jukema; J J Bax; J D Schuijf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Fleur R de Graaf; Joëlla E van Velzen; Stephanie M de Boer; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Allard Sieders; Greetje J de Grooth; J Wouter Jukema; Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Crown years for non-invasive cardiovascular imaging (Part IV): 30 years of cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.