Literature DB >> 20209509

Evaluation of blood collection tubes using selected reaction monitoring MS: implications for proteomic biomarker studies.

Sarah A Randall1, Matthew J McKay, Mark S Baker, Mark P Molloy.   

Abstract

An emphasis of current proteomic research is the validation of plasma protein biomarkers. The process of blood collection itself is critical to the accuracy and reproducibility of quantitative biomarker assays. We have developed selected reaction monitoring (SRM) assays to analyse thirteen abundant plasma proteins and evaluated the impact of three different blood collection tubes on the levels of these proteins. We also assessed the implications of the time taken to analyse plasma samples by evaluating the recovery of these proteins. We showed that SRM detects minor differences in the levels of some proteins which can be attributed to collection tube type. The average recovery for 12 of 18 assays was higher for proteins that were collected in tubes containing protease inhibitors compared to conventional collection tubes. For five of the assays, the differential recovery was statistically significant. Delaying MS analysis of a freeze-thawed sample for 1 hour showed greatly reduced recovery of these analytes; however differences attributed to tube type were only evident at the baseline timepoint. Finally, we assessed the natural variation of circulating levels of these proteins in a cohort of seven healthy individuals. This study provides useful information for researchers contemplating blood collection for undertaking protein biomarker studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20209509     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200900517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  8 in total

Review 1.  Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions.

Authors:  Paola Picotti; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Understanding preanalytical variables and their effects on clinical biomarkers of oncology and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Lokesh Agrawal; Kelly B Engel; Sarah R Greytak; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Advances and challenges in biomarker development for type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention using omic technologies.

Authors:  Colleen Carey; Sharad Purohit; Jin-Xiong She
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-09-01

4.  Expression-based Genome-wide Association Study Links OPN and IL1-RA With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes in Children.

Authors:  Xiaofan Jia; Kyoko Toda; Ling He; Dongmei Miao; Satoru Yamada; Liping Yu; Keiichi Kodama
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.134

5.  Evaluating the effects of preanalytical variables on the stability of the human plasma proteome.

Authors:  Maria E Hassis; Richard K Niles; Miles N Braten; Matthew E Albertolle; H Ewa Witkowska; Carl A Hubel; Susan J Fisher; Katherine E Williams
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Evaluation of protease inhibitors containing tubes for MS-based plasma peptide profiling studies.

Authors:  Vanessa Pérez; Javier Juega-Mariño; Anna Bonjoch; Eugenia Negredo; Bonaventura Clotet; Ramón Romero; Josep Bonet
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  The effect of pre-analytical variability on the measurement of MRM-MS-based mid- to high-abundance plasma protein biomarkers and a panel of cytokines.

Authors:  Adriana Aguilar-Mahecha; Michael A Kuzyk; Dominik Domanski; Christoph H Borchers; Mark Basik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of serum, EDTA plasma and P100 plasma for luminex-based biomarker multiplex assays in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the SPIROMICS study.

Authors:  Wanda K O'Neal; Wayne Anderson; Patricia V Basta; Elizabeth E Carretta; Claire M Doerschuk; R Graham Barr; Eugene R Bleecker; Stephanie A Christenson; Jeffrey L Curtis; Meilan K Han; Nadia N Hansel; Richard E Kanner; Eric C Kleerup; Fernando J Martinez; Bruce E Miller; Stephen P Peters; Stephen I Rennard; Mary Beth Scholand; Ruth Tal-Singer; Prescott G Woodruff; David J Couper; Sonia M Davis
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.531

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.