Literature DB >> 20209440

The effect of superovulation on the contributions of individual blastomeres from 2-cell stage CF1 mouse embryos to the blastocyst.

Mika Katayama1, R Michael Roberts.   

Abstract

It remains controversial whether blastomeres of 2-cell stage mouse embryos show bias in their contribution to the blastocyst and whether there is any effect of superovulation. Two-cell stage embryos from CF1 mice were derived by either natural breeding (N) or superovulation (S) and cultured in vitro. At blastocyst, inner cell mass and trophectoderm were distinguished by Cdx2 and Oct4 immunostaining. A fluorescent dye (CM-Dil) was also used to tag individual blastomeres at the 2-cell stage, and the descendant cells identified by their red fluorescence. S and N embryos developed to blastocyst at the same rate and contained a similar number of cells. However, with S embryos, the descendants of the blastomere labeled with CM-DiI contributed predominantly to either the embryonic or abembryonic pole about 70% of the time, whereas most N embryos displayed random patterning, with no restriction to one or other of the poles. In S-embryos, but not N-embryos, the leading blastomere at second cleavage contributed preferentially to the embryonic pole of the blastocyst and the lagging blastomere to the abembryonic pole and hence mural trophectoderm. In addition, a tetrahedral rather than a flat morphology at the 4-cell stage of S-embryos was strongly biased to displaying the embryonic/abembryonic pattern at blastocyst. In contrast, S-embryos lacking a zona pellucida resembled N embryos in their patterning. In CF1 mice, superovulation has little effect on development to blastocyst, but enforces a greater degree of lineage restriction than natural breeding, most likely through constraints imposed by the zona pellucida.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20209440      PMCID: PMC9040203          DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.092942mk

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Biol        ISSN: 0214-6282            Impact factor:   2.203


  25 in total

1.  First cleavage plane of the mouse egg is not predetermined but defined by the topology of the two apposing pronuclei.

Authors:  Takashi Hiiragi; Davor Solter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation.

Authors:  Hitoshi Niwa; Yayoi Toyooka; Daisuke Shimosato; Dan Strumpf; Kadue Takahashi; Rika Yagi; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Blastocyst axis is specified independently of early cell lineage but aligns with the ZP shape.

Authors:  Yoko Kurotaki; Kohei Hatta; Kazuki Nakao; Yo-Ichi Nabeshima; Toshihiko Fujimori
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Computer simulation of emerging asymmetry in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Hisao Honda; Nami Motosugi; Tatsuzo Nagai; Masaharu Tanemura; Takashi Hiiragi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Developmental ability of zona-free mouse embryos is influenced by cell association at the 4-cell stage.

Authors:  H Suzuki; M Togashi; J Adachi; Y Toyoda
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Spatial arrangement of individual 4-cell stage blastomeres and the order in which they are generated correlate with blastocyst pattern in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Karolina Piotrowska-Nitsche; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 1.882

7.  Spatial alignment of the mouse blastocyst axis across the first cleavage plane is caused by mechanical constraint rather than developmental bias among blastomeres.

Authors:  Vernadeth B Alarcón; Yusuke Marikawa
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.609

8.  Role of Cdx2 and cell polarity in cell allocation and specification of trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jedrusik; David-Emlyn Parfitt; Guoji Guo; Maria Skamagki; Joanna B Grabarek; Martin H Johnson; Paul Robson; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  The first cell-fate decisions in the mouse embryo: destiny is a matter of both chance and choice.

Authors:  Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 5.578

10.  Formation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the mouse blastocyst: relationships between orientation of early cleavage divisions and pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions.

Authors:  Marcus Bischoff; David-Emlyn Parfitt; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  9 in total

1.  Transcript profiling of individual twin blastomeres derived by splitting two-cell stage murine embryos.

Authors:  R Michael Roberts; Mika Katayama; Scott R Magnuson; Michael T Falduto; Karen E O Torres
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Dynamic profiles of Oct-4, Cdx-2 and acetylated H4K5 in in-vivo-derived rabbit embryos.

Authors:  Chien-Hong Chen; Jie Xu; Wei-Fang Chang; Chia-Chia Liu; Hwa-Yun Su; Y Eugene Chen; Fuliang Du; Li-Ying Sung
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Dynamic changes in leptin distribution in the progression from ovum to blastocyst of the pre-implantation mouse embryo.

Authors:  Laura C Schulz; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Development of monozygotic twin mouse embryos from the time of blastomere separation at the two-cell stage to blastocyst.

Authors:  Mika Katayama; Mark R Ellersieck; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 5.  Trophoblast stem cells.

Authors:  R Michael Roberts; Susan J Fisher
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Effect of L-carnitine on in vitro developmental rate, the zona pellucida and hatching of blastocysts and their cell numbers in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Nasrin Khanmohammadi; Mansoureh Movahedin; Manouchehr Safari; Hamid Reza Sameni; Behpour Yousefi; Behnaz Jafari; Sam Zarbakhsh
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-10

7.  Totipotency segregates between the sister blastomeres of two-cell stage mouse embryos.

Authors:  E Casser; S Israel; A Witten; K Schulte; S Schlatt; V Nordhoff; M Boiani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Random Allocation of Blastomere Descendants to the Trophectoderm and ICM of the Bovine Blastocyst.

Authors:  Lessly P Sepulveda-Rincon; Delphine Dube; Pierre Adenot; Ludivine Laffont; Sylvie Ruffini; Laurence Gall; Bruce K Campbell; Veronique Duranthon; Nathalie Beaujean; Walid E Maalouf
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Embryo cell allocation patterns are not altered by biopsy but can be linked with further development.

Authors:  L P Sepulveda-Rincon; N Islam; P Marsters; B K Campbell; N Beaujean; W E Maalouf
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.906

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.