Literature DB >> 18196554

Spatial alignment of the mouse blastocyst axis across the first cleavage plane is caused by mechanical constraint rather than developmental bias among blastomeres.

Vernadeth B Alarcón1, Yusuke Marikawa.   

Abstract

The embryonic-abembryonic (Em-Ab) axis of the mouse blastocyst has been found in several studies to align orthogonal to the first cleavage plane, raising the possibility that a developmental prepattern already exists at the two-cell stage. However, it is also possible that such alignment is not due to any developmental disparity between the two-cell stage blastomeres, but rather is caused by an extrinsic mechanical constraint that is conferred by an irregular shape of the zona pellucida (ZP). Here, we conducted a series of experiments to distinguish between these possibilities. We showed that the shape of the ZP at the two-cell stage varied among embryos, ranging from near spherical to ellipsoidal, and that the ZP shape did not change until the blastocyst stage. In those embryos with an ellipsoidal ZP, the Em-Ab axis tended to lie orthogonal to the first cleavage plane, while in those embryos with a near spherical ZP, there was no such relationship. The clonal boundary between the descendants of the two-cell stage blastomeres tended to lie orthogonal to the Em-Ab axis when the rotation of the embryo within the ZP was experimentally prevented, while the control embryos did not exhibit such tendency. These results support the possibility that an apparent correlation between the first cleavage plane and the blastocyst axis can be generated by the mechanical constraint from the ZP but not by a developmental prepattern. Moreover, recent reports indicate that the vegetal blastomere of the four-cell stage embryo that had undergone a specific type of second cleavages is destined to contribute to the abembryonic side of the blastocyst. However, our present study shows that in spite of such specific second cleavages, the vegetal blastomere did not preferentially give rise to the abembryonic side. This result implicates that the lineage of the four-cell stage blastomere is not restricted even when embryos undergo a specific type of second cleavages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196554      PMCID: PMC3430728          DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  24 in total

Review 1.  First cell fate decisions and spatial patterning in the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.727

2.  Four-cell stage mouse blastomeres have different developmental properties.

Authors:  Karolina Piotrowska-Nitsche; Aitana Perea-Gomez; Seiki Haraguchi; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  The case for prepatterning in the mouse.

Authors:  Richard L Gardner
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2005-06

Review 4.  Building the mouse gastrula: signals, asymmetry and lineages.

Authors:  Patrick P L Tam; David A F Loebel; Satomi S Tanaka
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Weaknesses in the case against prepatterning in the mouse.

Authors:  R L Gardner
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 6.  Axis development and early asymmetry in mammals.

Authors:  R S Beddington; E J Robertson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-01-22       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Spatial arrangement of individual 4-cell stage blastomeres and the order in which they are generated correlate with blastocyst pattern in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Karolina Piotrowska-Nitsche; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  Polarity of the mouse embryo is established at blastocyst and is not prepatterned.

Authors:  Nami Motosugi; Tobias Bauer; Zbigniew Polanski; Davor Solter; Takashi Hiiragi
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Unbiased contribution of the first two blastomeres to mouse blastocyst development.

Authors:  Vernadeth B Alarcón; Yusuke Marikawa
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.609

10.  Both blastomeres of the mouse 2-cell embryo contribute to the embryonic portion of the blastocyst.

Authors:  Anna Chróścicka; S Komorowski; Marek Maleszewski
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.609

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cell polarity regulator PARD6B is essential for trophectoderm formation in the preimplantation mouse embryo.

Authors:  Vernadeth B Alarcon
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Staging mouse preimplantation development in vivo using optical coherence microscopy.

Authors:  Emma L Moore; Shang Wang; Irina V Larina
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 3.  Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Yusuke Marikawa; Vernadeth B Alarcón
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Rho-associated kinase activity is required for proper morphogenesis of the inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Arlene May A Laeno; Dana Ann A Tamashiro; Vernadeth B Alarcon
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  The effect of superovulation on the contributions of individual blastomeres from 2-cell stage CF1 mouse embryos to the blastocyst.

Authors:  Mika Katayama; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.203

6.  Simulating the mammalian blastocyst--molecular and mechanical interactions pattern the embryo.

Authors:  Pawel Krupinski; Vijay Chickarmane; Carsten Peterson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Random Allocation of Blastomere Descendants to the Trophectoderm and ICM of the Bovine Blastocyst.

Authors:  Lessly P Sepulveda-Rincon; Delphine Dube; Pierre Adenot; Ludivine Laffont; Sylvie Ruffini; Laurence Gall; Bruce K Campbell; Veronique Duranthon; Nathalie Beaujean; Walid E Maalouf
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Dynamic shapes of the zygote and two-cell mouse and human.

Authors:  Chris F Graham; Shane Windsor; Anna Ajduk; Thanh Trinh; Anna Vincent; Celine Jones; Kevin Coward; Dilraj Kalsi; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz; Karl Swann; Adrian L R Thomas
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 2.422

9.  The Principal Forces of Oocyte Polarity Are Evolutionary Conserved but May Not Affect the Contribution of the First Two Blastomeres to the Blastocyst Development in Mammals.

Authors:  Sayyed-Morteza Hosseini; Fariba Moulavi; Nima Tanhaie-Vash; Vajihe Asgari; Hamid-Reza Ghanaei; Maryam Abedi-Dorche; Naser Jafarzadeh; Hossein Gourabi; Abdol-Hossein Shahverdi; Ahmad Vosough Dizaj; Abolfazl Shirazi; Mohammad-Hossein Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Embryo cell allocation patterns are not altered by biopsy but can be linked with further development.

Authors:  L P Sepulveda-Rincon; N Islam; P Marsters; B K Campbell; N Beaujean; W E Maalouf
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.906

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.