Literature DB >> 20208068

Comparing genome-wide chromatin profiles using ChIP-chip or ChIP-seq.

Frank Johannes1, René Wardenaar, Maria Colomé-Tatché, Florence Mousson, Petra de Graaf, Michal Mokry, Victor Guryev, H Th Marc Timmers, Edwin Cuppen, Ritsert C Jansen.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq technologies provide genome-wide measurements of various types of chromatin marks at an unprecedented resolution. With ChIP samples collected from different tissue types and/or individuals, we can now begin to characterize stochastic or systematic changes in epigenetic patterns during development (intra-individual) or at the population level (inter-individual). This requires statistical methods that permit a simultaneous comparison of multiple ChIP samples on a global as well as locus-specific scale. Current analytical approaches are mainly geared toward single sample investigations, and therefore have limited applicability in this comparative setting. This shortcoming presents a bottleneck in biological interpretations of multiple sample data.
RESULTS: To address this limitation, we introduce a parametric classification approach for the simultaneous analysis of two (or more) ChIP samples. We consider several competing models that reflect alternative biological assumptions about the global distribution of the data. Inferences about locus-specific and genome-wide chromatin differences are reached through the estimation of multivariate mixtures. Parameter estimates are obtained using an incremental version of the Expectation-Maximization algorithm (IEM). We demonstrate efficient scalability and application to three very diverse ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq experiments. The proposed approach is evaluated against several published ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq software packages. We recommend its use as a first-pass algorithm to identify candidate regions in the epigenome, possibly followed by some type of second-pass algorithm to fine-tune detected peaks in accordance with biological or technological criteria. AVAILABILITY: R source code is available at http://gbic.biol.rug.nl/supplementary/2009/ChromatinProfiles/. Access to Chip-seq data: GEO repository GSE17937.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20208068     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  17 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetics in sports.

Authors:  Tobias Ehlert; Perikles Simon; Dirk A Moser
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Differential principal component analysis of ChIP-seq.

Authors:  Hongkai Ji; Xia Li; Qian-fei Wang; Yang Ning
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A new approach for the joint analysis of multiple ChIP-seq libraries with application to histone modification.

Authors:  John P Ferguson; Judy H Cho; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-02-10

4.  Combining transposon mutagenesis and reporter genes to identify novel regulators of the topA promoter in Streptomyces.

Authors:  Martyna Gongerowska-Jac; Marcin Jan Szafran; Dagmara Jakimowicz
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Evaluation of algorithm performance in ChIP-seq peak detection.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Wilbanks; Marc T Facciotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genome-Wide Gene Expression Profiling of Nucleus Accumbens Neurons Projecting to Ventral Pallidum Using both Microarray and Transcriptome Sequencing.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Zhimin Liu; Suzhen Gong; Xingjun Wu; William L Taylor; Robert W Williams; Shannon G Matta; Burt M Sharp
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  ChIP-seq Analysis in R (CSAR): An R package for the statistical detection of protein-bound genomic regions.

Authors:  Jose M Muiño; Kerstin Kaufmann; Roeland Chj van Ham; Gerco C Angenent; Pawel Krajewski
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 4.993

8.  An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies.

Authors:  Michiel E Adriaens; Magali Jaillard; Lars M T Eijssen; Claus-Dieter Mayer; Chris T A Evelo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Interconversion between active and inactive TATA-binding protein transcription complexes in the mouse genome.

Authors:  Mohamed-Amin Choukrallah; Dominique Kobi; Igor Martianov; W W M Pim Pijnappel; Nikolai Mischerikow; Tao Ye; Albert J R Heck; H Th Marc Timmers; Irwin Davidson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  A review of three different studies on hidden markov models for epigenetic problems: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Kyung-Eun Lee; Hyun-Seok Park
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2014-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.