Literature DB >> 20207962

Monitoring vigilance during perimetry by using pupillography.

David B Henson1, Thomas Emuh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE. To report and present data on a method for monitoring patient vigilance during a visual field test by using pupillometry. METHODS. Pupil diameter was recorded at 60 Hz with an eye movement tracking system in 13 patients attending the glaucoma outpatient clinics at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital. The patients were instructed to fixate a central target and to press a response button when they saw a stimulus that was randomly presented 5 degrees to the left or right of fixation. A repetitive up/down bracketing strategy was used (1-dB steps, 2-second interstimulus intervals, 10-minute duration) at these two locations. Wavelet analysis was used to extract a denoised measure of the pupil diameter and the amplitude of any pupillary fatigue waves. The relationship between the probability of seeing a stimulus and these two components of the pupil response was investigated. RESULTS. Good pupil data were obtained from 12 patients. Most (8/12) showed gradual miosis and periods of pupillary fatigue waves during the recording session. Pupillary fatigue waves became more evident with test duration, and the probability of seeing a stimulus was higher when the pupil was dilated (P < 0.001) and the amplitude of the papillary fatigue waves was low (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Pupil miosis and fatigue wave amplitude are related to vigilance in patients who take a perimetric-type test. Pupillography can be used to investigate vigilance and how it contributes to perimetric variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207962     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  Dissociation between neural signatures of stimulus and choice in population activity of human V1 during perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Kyoung Whan Choe; Randolph Blake; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The confounding effects of eye blinking on pupillometry, and their remedy.

Authors:  Kyung Yoo; Jeongyeol Ahn; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Portable Perimetry Using Eye-Tracking on a Tablet Computer-A Feasibility Assessment.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; Nicholas D Smith; Wei Bi; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Comparison of Short- And Long-Term Variability in Standard Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Carla N Urata; Eduardo B Mariottoni; Alessandro A Jammal; Nara G Ogata; Atalie C Thompson; Samuel I Berchuck; Tais Estrela; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  A qualitative investigation into patients' views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring.

Authors:  Fiona C Glen; Helen Baker; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Yapp; Nagi Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry.

Authors:  Takuya Numata; Ted Maddess; Chota Matsumoto; Sachiko Okuyama; Shigeki Hashimoto; Hiroki Nomoto; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Incorporating Spatial Models in Visual Field Test Procedures.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Gaze-Contingent Flicker Pupil Perimetry Detects Scotomas in Patients With Cerebral Visual Impairments or Glaucoma.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; Carlien Roelofzen; Alessio Fracasso; Douwe P Bergsma; Mies van Genderen; Giorgio L Porro; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  The Human Touch: Using a Webcam to Autonomously Monitor Compliance During Visual Field Assessments.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; Giorgia Demaria; Iris Tigchelaar; Daniel S Asfaw; David F Edgar; Peter Campbell; Tamsin Callaghan; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.