Literature DB >> 20207584

Skewed X inactivation and IVF-conceived infants.

Jennifer L King1, Baoli Yang, Amy E T Sparks, Lindsay M Mains, Jeffrey C Murray, Bradley J Van Voorhis.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether skewed X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is associated with IVF. A retrospective cohort study was performed comprising 30 female infants conceived by IVF and 44 naturally conceived control infants matched for gestational age and sex. Cord blood DNA samples were obtained and XCI patterns were analysed using a methylation-sensitive assay. Eight IVF samples and 13 control samples were excluded from the study because they were either homozygous or alleles were too similar for the assay to determine skewing. Mildly skewed XCI (80-90% inactivation of one allele) was present in two of 22 (9.1%) IVF samples and two of 31 (6.5%) control samples. Extremely skewed XCI (>90% inactivation of one allele) was found in two of 22 (9.1%) IVF samples and none of 31 control samples. Neither difference was statistically significant. However, the mean degree of skewed XCI in the IVF group was 72.0% and in the control group was 62.4% (P=0.002). Larger studies are needed to clarify the relationship between IVF and skewed XCI. Copyright (c) 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207584      PMCID: PMC2923043          DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  29 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome.

Authors:  W Reik; J Walter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation.

Authors:  P Avner; E Heard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Michèle Hansen; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Carol Bower; Sandra Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  In vitro fertilization is associated with an increase in major birth defects.

Authors:  Christine K Olson; Kim M Keppler-Noreuil; Paul A Romitti; William T Budelier; Ginny Ryan; Amy E T Sparks; Bradley J Van Voorhis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Brief report: non-random X chromosome inactivation in females with autism.

Authors:  Z Talebizadeh; D C Bittel; O J Veatch; N Kibiryeva; M G Butler
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2005-10

6.  ATRX syndrome in a girl with a heterozygous mutation in the ATRX Zn finger domain and a totally skewed X-inactivation pattern.

Authors:  Catherine Badens; Nathalie Martini; Sébastien Courrier; Vincent DesPortes; Renaud Touraine; Nicolas Levy; Patrick Edery
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Differential effects of culture on imprinted H19 expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo.

Authors:  A S Doherty; M R Mann; K D Tremblay; M S Bartolomei; R M Schultz
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects.

Authors:  Gerald F Cox; Joachim Bürger; Va Lip; Ulrike A Mau; Karl Sperling; Bai-Lin Wu; Bernhard Horsthemke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  X-chromosome inactivation patterns in monozygotic twins and sib pairs discordant for nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate.

Authors:  Jane W Kimani; Min Shi; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Kaare Christensen; Danilo Moretti-Ferreira; Mary L Marazita; L Leigh Field; John W Canady; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Skewed X-chromosome inactivation is a common feature of X-linked mental retardation disorders.

Authors:  Robert M Plenge; Roger A Stevenson; Herbert A Lubs; Charles E Schwartz; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic changes and assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Sneha Mani; Jayashri Ghosh; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 2.  Comprehensive meta-analysis reveals association between multiple imprinting disorders and conception by assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Victoria K Cortessis; Moosa Azadian; James Buxbaum; Fatimata Sanogo; Ashley Y Song; Intira Sriprasert; Pengxiao C Wei; Jing Yu; Karine Chung; Kimberly D Siegmund
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  XCI in preimplantation mouse and human embryos: first there is remodelling….

Authors:  I M van den Berg; R J Galjaard; J S E Laven; J H van Doorninck
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Contemporary Use of ICSI and Epigenetic Risks to Future Generations.

Authors:  Romualdo Sciorio; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.