Literature DB >> 20207461

Listen carefully: the risk of error in spoken medication orders.

Bruce L Lambert1, Laura Walsh Dickey, William M Fisher, Robert D Gibbons, Swu-Jane Lin, Paul A Luce, Conor T McLennan, John W Senders, Clement T Yu.   

Abstract

Clinicians and patients often confuse drug names that sound alike. We conducted auditory perception experiments in the United States to assess the impact of similarity, familiarity, background noise and other factors on clinicians' (physicians, family pharmacists, nurses) and laypersons' ability to identify spoken drug names. We found that accuracy increased significantly as the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio increased, as subjective familiarity with the name increased and as the national prescribing frequency of the name increased. For clinicians only, similarity to other drug names reduced identification accuracy, especially when the neighboring names were frequently prescribed. When one name was substituted for another, the substituted name was almost always a more frequently prescribed drug. Objectively measurable properties of drug names can be used to predict confusability. The magnitude of the noise and familiarity effects suggests that they may be important targets for intervention. We conclude that the ability of clinicians and lay people to identify spoken drug names is influenced by signal-to-noise ratio, subjective familiarity, prescribing frequency, and the similarity neighborhoods of drug names. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207461     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Phonotactic probability of brand names: I'd buy that!

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Alexander J Donoso
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-26

Review 2.  Consumer language, patient language, and thesauri: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Catherine A Smith
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2011-04

3.  Reducing wrong patient selection errors: exploring the design space of user interface techniques.

Authors:  Awalin Sopan; Catherine Plaisant; Seth Powsner; Ben Shneiderman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

4.  Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors.

Authors:  Bruce L Lambert; William Galanter; King Lup Liu; Suzanne Falck; Gordon Schiff; Christine Rash-Foanio; Kelly Schmidt; Neeha Shrestha; Allen J Vaida; Michael J Gaunt
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Categorizing and understanding medication errors in hospital pharmacy in relation to human factors.

Authors:  Reham Faraj Al-Ahmadi; Lobna Al-Juffali; Sulafah Al-Shanawani; Sheraz Ali
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Speech error and tip of the tongue diary for mobile devices.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Cynthia S Q Siew; Nichol Castro; Rutherford Goldstein; Jeremy A Gharst; Jeriprolu J Kumar; Erica B Boos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-13

7.  Cognitive tests predict real-world errors: the relationship between drug name confusion rates in laboratory-based memory and perception tests and corresponding error rates in large pharmacy chains.

Authors:  Scott R Schroeder; Meghan M Salomon; William L Galanter; Gordon D Schiff; Allen J Vaida; Michael J Gaunt; Michelle L Bryson; Christine Rash; Suzanne Falck; Bruce L Lambert
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 7.035

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.