Literature DB >> 20207320

Performance of dual-energy CT with tin filter technology for the discrimination of renal cysts and enhancing masses.

Sebastian Leschka1, Paul Stolzmann, Stephan Baumüller, Hans Scheffel, Lotus Desbiolles, Bernhard Schmid, Borut Marincek, Hatem Alkadhi.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) equipped with the new tin filter technology to classify phantom renal lesions as cysts or enhancing masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty spherical lesion proxies ranging in diameter from 6 to 27 mm were filled with either distilled water (n = 10) representing cysts or titrated iodinated contrast solutions with a concentration of 0.45 (n = 10), 0.9 (n = 10), and 1.8 mg/mL (n = 10) representing enhancing masses. The lesion proxies were placed in a 12-cm diameter renal phantom containing minced beef and submerged in a 28-cm water bath. DECT was performed using the new dual-source CT system (Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) allowing for an improved energy separation by using a tin filter. DECT was performed at tube voltages of 140/80 kV without the tin filter (protocol A) and with tin filter (protocol B). The tube current time product was selected in each protocol to achieve a constant CTDI (computed tomography dose index) with both protocols of 19 mGy (full dose), 9.5 mGy (half dose), and 4.8 mGy (quarter dose). Two blinded readers classified each lesion as a cyst or enhancing mass by using iodine overlay (IO) images. One reader measured the CT numbers of each lesion at 120 kV, in the IO, linear blending (LB), and virtual noncontrast (VNC) images.
RESULTS: The CT numbers of the lesions at 120 kV were 0.1 +/- 0.7 HU (0 mg iodine/mL), 9.1 +/- 0.7 HU (0.45 mg/mL), 18.1 +/- 1.4 HU (0.9 mg/mL), and 37.6 +/- 1.6 HU (1.8 mg/mL). Mean diameter of the lesion proxies filled with water or different iodine concentrations was similar (P = 0.38). Image noise was not significantly different in protocols A and B at the corresponding dose levels. At full dose, protocol A had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 60% for discriminating renal lesions. Sensitivity and specificity declined to 84% and 38% at quarter dose. In protocol B, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 90% at full dose and 93% and 70% at quarter dose. All misclassifications occurred in cyst or low iodine concentration (0.45 mg/mL) lesion proxies. The differences between CT numbers at 120 kV and in the IO, VNC, and AW (average weighted) images were significantly lower in protocol B compared to protocol A (each P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: DECT using the tin filter results in an improved sensitivity and specificity for discriminating renal cysts from enhancing masses in a kidney phantom model and demonstrates higher dose efficiency as compared to former dual energy technology without tin filters. Copyright 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20207320     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy computed tomography applications in uroradiology.

Authors:  Jong Park; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Dual-energy CT with tin filter technology for the discrimination of renal lesion proxies containing blood, protein, and contrast-agent. An experimental phantom study.

Authors:  Christoph Karlo; Arno Lauber; Robert Paul Götti; Stephan Baumüller; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Lotus Desbiolles; Bernhard Schmidt; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Dual energy MDCT assessment of renal lesions: an overview.

Authors:  Achille Mileto; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson; Giorgio Ascenti; Daniel T Boll
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [Oncological diseases and postoperative alterations of the bladder and urinary tract].

Authors:  M M Ong; P Riffel; J Budjan; C Bolenz; S O Schönberg; S Haneder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Recent developments of dual-energy CT in oncology.

Authors:  David Simons; Marc Kachelriess; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Dual-energy computed tomography for evaluation of breast cancer: value of virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed with a noise-reduced monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Kanako Okada; Megumi Matsuda; Takaharu Tsuda; Teruhito Kido; Akihiro Murata; Hikaru Nishiyama; Kanako Nishiyama; Haruna Yamasawa; Yoshiaki Kamei; Mie Kurata; Mana Fukushima; Riko Kitazawa; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  Imaging management of incidentally detected small renal masses.

Authors:  V Anik Sahni; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Dual- and multi-energy CT: approach to functional imaging.

Authors:  Juergen Fornaro; Sebastian Leschka; Dennis Hibbeln; Anthony Butler; Nigel Anderson; Gregor Pache; Hans Scheffel; Simon Wildermuth; Hatem Alkadhi; Paul Stolzmann
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-01-19

Review 9.  Emerging clinical applications of computed tomography.

Authors:  Carlo Liguori; Giulia Frauenfelder; Carlo Massaroni; Paola Saccomandi; Francesco Giurazza; Francesca Pitocco; Riccardo Marano; Emiliano Schena
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-06-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.