Literature DB >> 20206581

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial.

Richard B Lipton1, David W Dodick, Stephen D Silberstein, Joel R Saper, Sheena K Aurora, Starr H Pearlman, Robert E Fischell, Patricia L Ruppel, Peter J Goadsby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preliminary work suggests that single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) could be effective as a treatment for migraine. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a new portable sTMS device for acute treatment of migraine with aura.
METHODS: We undertook a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, two-phase, sham-controlled study at 18 centres in the USA. 267 adults aged 18-68 years were enrolled into phase one. All individuals had to meet international criteria for migraine with aura, with visual aura preceding at least 30% of migraines followed by moderate or severe headache in more than 90% of those attacks. 66 patients dropped out during phase one. In phase two, 201 individuals were randomly allocated by computer to either sham stimulation (n=99) or sTMS (n=102). We instructed participants to treat up to three attacks over 3 months while experiencing aura. The primary outcome was pain-free response 2 h after the first attack, and co-primary outcomes were non-inferiority at 2 h for nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Analyses were modified intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00449540.
FINDINGS: 37 patients did not treat a migraine attack and were excluded from outcome analyses. 164 patients treated at least one attack with sTMS (n=82) or sham stimulation (n=82; modified intention-to-treat analysis set). Pain-free response rates after 2 h were significantly higher with sTMS (32/82 [39%]) than with sham stimulation (18/82 [22%]), for a therapeutic gain of 17% (95% CI 3-31%; p=0.0179). Sustained pain-free response rates significantly favoured sTMS at 24 h and 48 h post-treatment. Non-inferiority was shown for nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. No device-related serious adverse events were recorded, and incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between sTMS and sham groups.
INTERPRETATION: Early treatment of migraine with aura by sTMS resulted in increased freedom from pain at 2 h compared with sham stimulation, and absence of pain was sustained 24 h and 48 h after treatment. sTMS could be a promising acute treatment for some patients with migraine with aura. FUNDING: Neuralieve. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206581     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70054-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  98 in total

1.  Migraine: Portable sTMS device relieves the pain of migraine.

Authors:  Katrina Ray
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Headache.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Transcranial magnetic simulation in the treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Starr H Pearlman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Neurostimulation for Treatment of Migraine and Cluster Headache.

Authors:  Todd J Schwedt; Bert Vargas
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 6.  Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Luciana Santos; Mark D Peterson; Margaret Ehinger
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Analyzing critical propagation in a reaction-diffusion-advection model using unstable slow waves.

Authors:  Frederike Kneer; Klaus Obermayer; Markus A Dahlem
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 1.890

Review 8.  Central and Peripheral Neural Targets for Neurostimulation of Chronic Headaches.

Authors:  Massimo Leone; Alberto Proietti Cecchini
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2017-03

9.  Towards dynamical network biomarkers in neuromodulation of episodic migraine.

Authors:  Markus A Dahlem; Sebastian Rode; Arne May; Naoya Fujiwara; Yoshito Hirata; Kazuyuki Aihara; Jürgen Kurths
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.757

Review 10.  A new era in headache treatment.

Authors:  Michail Vikelis; Konstantinos C Spingos; Alan M Rapoport
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.