Literature DB >> 20206375

Chemical drinking water quality in Ghana: water costs and scope for advanced treatment.

Helfrid M A Rossiter1, Peter A Owusu, Esi Awuah, Alan M Macdonald, Andrea I Schäfer.   

Abstract

To reduce child mortality and improve health in Ghana boreholes and wells are being installed across the country by the private sector, NGO's and the Ghanaian government. Water quality is not generally monitored once a water source has been improved. Water supplies were sampled across Ghana from mostly boreholes, wells and rivers as well as some piped water from the different regions and analysed for the chemical quality. Chemical water quality was found to exceed the WHO guidelines in 38% of samples, while pH varied from 3.7 to 8.9. Excess levels of nitrate (NO(3)(-)) were found in 21% of the samples, manganese (Mn) and fluoride (F(-)) in 11% and 6.7%, respectively. Heavy metals such as lead (Pb), arsenic (As) and uranium (U) were localised to mining areas. Elements without health based guideline values such as aluminium (Al, 95%) and chloride (Cl, 5.7%) were found above the provisional guideline value. Economic information was gathered to identify water costs and ability to pay. Capital costs of wells and boreholes are about pound1200 and pound3800 respectively. The majority of installation costs are generally paid by the government or NGO's, while the maintenance is expected to be covered by the community. At least 58% of the communities had a water payment system in place, either an annual fee/one-off fee or "pay-as-you-fetch". The annual fee was between pound0.3-21, while the boreholes had a water collection fee of pound0.07-0.7/m(3), many wells were free. Interestingly, the most expensive water ( pound2.9-3.5/m(3)) was brought by truck. Many groundwater sources were not used due to poor chemical water quality. Considering the cost of unsuccessful borehole development, the potential for integrating suitable water treatment into the capital and maintenance costs of water sources is discussed. Additionally, many sources were not in use due to lack of water capacity, equipment malfunction or lack of economic resources to repair and maintain equipment. Those issues need to be addressed in combination with water quality, coordinated water supply provision and possible treatment to ensure sustainability of improved water resources. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20206375     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Determination of aluminium in groundwater samples by GF-AAS, ICP-AES, ICP-MS and modelling of inorganic aluminium complexes.

Authors:  Marcin Frankowski; Anetta Zioła-Frankowska; Iwona Kurzyca; Karel Novotný; Tomas Vaculovič; Viktor Kanický; Marcin Siepak; Jerzy Siepak
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Water for human and livestock consumption in rural settings of Ethiopia: assessments of quality and health aspects.

Authors:  Kebede Amenu; André Markemann; Anne Valle Zárate
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of Heavy Metals of Anthropogenic Origin in Environmental Media and Biota in the Context of Gold Mining in Ghana.

Authors:  Frederick Ato Armah; Reginald Quansah; Isaac Luginaah
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-11-09

Review 4.  A Systematic Review: Costing and Financing of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools.

Authors:  Shannon M McGinnis; Thomas McKeon; Richa Desai; Akudo Ejelonu; Stanley Laskowski; Heather M Murphy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Integrated Assessment of Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining in Ghana-Part 2: Natural Sciences Review.

Authors:  Mozhgon Rajaee; Samuel Obiri; Allyson Green; Rachel Long; Samuel J Cobbina; Vincent Nartey; David Buck; Edward Antwi; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.