Literature DB >> 20205275

Factors influencing intercellular spaces in the rat esophageal epithelium.

Dong-Hong Zhang1, Li-Ya Zhou, Xiu-Yun Dong, Rong-Li Cui, Yan Xue, San-Ren Lin.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effect of acute stress, hydrochloric acid, ethanol, aspirin, and prednisolone on the intercellular spaces of the esophageal epithelium.
METHODS: Part I, male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into eight groups and treated with the damaging or control factors. The esophagus of each rat was macroscopically inspected. Histological changes in mucosal biopsies were examined by light microscopy, and the widths of intercellular spaces were determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Part II, in part I, we found that acute stress and aspirin induced dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) of the esophageal epithelium. Therefore, the effect of acid suppression pretreatment with esomeprazole on esophageal epithelial DIS induced by water immersion and restraint stress (WRS) and aspirin was further investigated to determine the association of DIS with acid reflux. After administration of 0.9% sodium chloride solution or esomeprazole solution orally for five days, rats underwent WRS or intragastric administration of aspirin solution. Esophageal epithelial intercellular spaces were investigated by TEM.
RESULTS: (1) The five damaging factors produced no lesions or inflammation in esophageal mucosa of rats under either gross or routine histological inspections. Esophageal epithelial intercellular space diameters in stress and aspirin groups were significantly greater, nearly three or two-fold respectively, than those in their corresponding control groups (stress model: 0.38 + or - 0.05 microm vs 0.13 + or - 0.02 microm, P < 0.01; aspirin model: 0.32 + or - 0.12 microm vs 0.19 + or - 0.05 microm, P < 0.01). Neither intragastric administration of hydrochloric acid or ethanol, nor hypodermic injection of prednisolone produced DIS compared with their corresponding control groups (hydrochloric acid model: 0.24 + or - 0.03 microm vs 0.19 + or - 0.05 microm, P > 0.05; ethanol model: 0.25 + or - 0.10 microm vs 0.19 + or - 0.05 microm, P > 0.05; prednisolone model: 0.20 + or - 0.03 microm vs 0.14 + or - 0.03 microm, P > 0.05); and (2) No significant difference in the intercellular space diameters was observed between the group pretreated with esomeprazole and the control group, in both the stress and aspirin models (stress model: 0.35 + or - 0.05 microm vs 0.37 + or - 0.05 microm, P > 0.05; aspirin model: 0.24 + or - 0.02 microm vs 0.27 + or - 0.03 microm, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Acute stress and aspirin can induce DIS of the esophageal epithelium in rats, and it is not correlated with acid reflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20205275      PMCID: PMC2835781          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i9.1063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  41 in total

1.  Chronic omeprazole treatment increases duodenal susceptibility to ethanol injury in rats.

Authors:  R A Erickson; S Bezabah; G Jonas; E Lifrak; A S Tarnawski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Electron microscopic changes in human oesophageal epithelium in oesophagitis.

Authors:  D Hopwood; G Milne; K R Logan
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 7.996

3.  Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux--damaged human esophageal epithelium.

Authors:  N A Tobey; J L Carson; R A Alkiek; R C Orlando
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Morphologic alterations in early acid-induced epithelial injury of the rabbit esophagus.

Authors:  C N Carney; R C Orlando; D W Powell; M M Dotson
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Role of capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves in gastroprotection against acid-independent and acid-dependent ulcerogens.

Authors:  T Brzozowski; S J Konturek; Z Sliwowski; J Pytko-Polończyk; A Szlachcic; D Drozdowicz
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Comparison of antacid, sucralfate, cimetidine, and ranitidine in protection of the gastric mucosa against ethanol injury.

Authors:  A Tarnawski; D Hollander; H Gergely; J Stachura
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-08-30       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Radial distribution of dilated intercellular spaces of the esophageal squamous epithelium in patients with reflux disease exhibiting discrete endoscopic lesions.

Authors:  M Vieth; R Fiocca; J Haringsma; J Delarive; P H Wiesel; W Tam; G N J Tytgat; J Dent; A Edebo; L Lundell; M Stolte
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.404

8.  Pathophysiology of acute acid injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium.

Authors:  R C Orlando; D W Powell; C N Carney
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  The relationship between stress and symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux: the influence of psychological factors.

Authors:  L A Bradley; J E Richter; T J Pulliam; J M Haile; I C Scarinci; C A Schan; C B Dalton; A N Salley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Progress with proton pump inhibition.

Authors:  N J Bell; R H Hunt
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec
View more
  4 in total

1.  Klf4 overexpression activates epithelial cytokines and inflammation-mediated esophageal squamous cell cancer in mice.

Authors:  Marie-Pier Tetreault; Mei-Lun Wang; Yizeng Yang; Jenna Travis; Qian-Chun Yu; Andres J Klein-Szanto; Jonathan P Katz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Cystitis, co-morbid disorders and associated epithelial dysfunction.

Authors:  Lori A Birder; Ann T Hanna-Mitchell; Emeran Mayer; Charles A Buffington
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  Biomarkers of Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Leila Kia; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 4.  Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.960

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.