Literature DB >> 20203126

Automatic landmarking of cephalograms using active appearance models.

Predrag Vucinić1, Zeljen Trpovski, Ivana Sćepan.   

Abstract

There have been many attempts to further improve and automate cephalometric analysis in order to increase accuracy, reduce errors due to subjectivity, and to provide more efficient use of clinicians' time. The aim of this research was to evaluate an automated system for landmarking of cephalograms based on the use of an active appearance model (AAM) that contains a statistical model of shape and grey-level appearance of an object of interest and represents both shape and texture variations of the region covered by the model. Multi-resolution implementation was used, in which the AAM iterate to convergence at each level before projecting the current solution to the next level of the model. The AAM system was trained using 60 randomly selected, hand-annotated digital cephalograms of subjects between 7.2 and 25.6 years of age, and tested with a leave-five-out method that enabled testing not only of the accuracy of the AAM system but also the accuracy of each AAM. Differences between methods were examined using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test. An average accuracy of 1.68 mm was obtained, with 61 per cent of landmarks detected within 2 mm and 95 per cent of landmarks detected within 5 mm precision. A noticeable increase in overall precision and detection of low-contrast cephalometric landmarks was achieved compared with other automated systems. These results suggest that the AAM approach can adequately represent the average shape and texture variations of craniofacial structures on digital radiographs. As such it can successfully be implemented for automatic localization of cephalometric landmarks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20203126     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  A preliminary study for determination of three-dimensional root apex position of the maxillary teeth using camera calibration technology.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Oh; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  How much deep learning is enough for automatic identification to be reliable?

Authors:  Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Youngsung Yu; Min-Gyu Kim; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis of Orbital Morphology Modification for Midface Correction Surgery.

Authors:  Tomasz Smektala; Ewelina Staniszewska; Agata Sławińska; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Marcin Tutak; Marcin Jędrzejewski; Małgorzata Chrusciel-Nogalska; Raphael Olszewski
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-08-21

Review 4.  Cephalometric Analysis in Orthodontics Using Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Aravind Kumar Subramanian; Yong Chen; Abdullah Almalki; Gautham Sivamurthy; Dashrath Kafle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 5.  Potential and impact of artificial intelligence algorithms in dento-maxillofacial radiology.

Authors:  Kuo Feng Hung; Qi Yong H Ai; Yiu Yan Leung; Andy Wai Kan Yeung
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography.

Authors:  Elif İzgi; Filiz Namdar Pekiner
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

7.  The use and performance of artificial intelligence applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kuofeng Hung; Carla Montalvao; Ray Tanaka; Taisuke Kawai; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Current applications and development of artificial intelligence for digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Ramadhan Hardani Putra; Chiaki Doi; Nobuhiro Yoda; Eha Renwi Astuti; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Automatic Analysis of Lateral Cephalograms Based on Multiresolution Decision Tree Regression Voting.

Authors:  Shumeng Wang; Huiqi Li; Jiazhi Li; Yanjun Zhang; Bingshuang Zou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 10.  Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review.

Authors:  Yashodhan M Bichu; Ismaeel Hansa; Aditi Y Bichu; Pratik Premjani; Carlos Flores-Mir; Nikhilesh R Vaid
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.750

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.