| Literature DB >> 20202432 |
Philippe Marianneau1, Vanessa Guillaume, Thong Wong, Munisamy Badmanathan, Ren Yih Looi, Severine Murri, Philippe Loth, Noel Tordo, Fabian Wild, Branka Horvat, Hugues Contamin.
Abstract
We infected squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) with Nipah virus to determine the monkeys' suitability for use as primate models in preclinical testing of preventive and therapeutic treatments. Infection of squirrel monkeys through intravenous injection was followed by high death rates associated with acute neurologic and respiratory illness and viral RNA and antigen production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20202432 PMCID: PMC3322034 DOI: 10.3201/eid1603.091346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Clinical course of Nipah virus infection in 12 squirrel monkeys*
| Monkey | Mode of infection | Dose, PFU/mL | Day of 1st symptoms | Duration of clinical state | Day of euthanasia | Clinical state at euthanasia | Clinical signs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A† | IV | 103 | – | – | 3 | Well | None |
| B | IV | 103 | 10 | 3 | 12† | Moribund | Uncoordinated motor movements, prostration and coma |
| C | IV | 103 | 19 | 3 | 21‡ | Moribund | Uncoordinated motor movements, prostration, and coma |
| D† | IV | 107 | – | – | 3 | Well | None |
| E | IV | 107 | 7 | 2 | 8† | Moribund | Uncoordinated motor movements, prostration, and coma |
| F | IV | 107 | 14 | 3 | 52 | Recovered/well | Anorexia, depression |
| G† | IN | 103 | – | – | 4 | Well | None |
| H | IN | 103 | – | – | 52 | Well | None |
| I | IN | 103 | 8 | 3 | 56 | Recovered/well | Anorexia, seizure |
| J† | IN | 107 | – | – | 4 | Well | None |
| K | IN | 107 | 17 | Septic shock not correlated with NiV infection | |||
| L | IN | 107 | 10 | 7 | 56 | Recovered/well | Anorexia, seizure, edema of eyes |
*IV, intravenous; IN, intranasal; NiV, Nipah virus. †Early systematic euthanasia. ‡Death caused by NiV infection.
Detection of Nipah virus specific RNA by RT-PCR in organs from intravenously infected animals*
| Infectious dose | 103 PFU |
| 107 PFU | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal number | A† | B‡ | C‡ | D† | E‡ | F | |
| Day euthanized | 3 | 12 | 21 | 3 | 8 | 52 | |
| Source of sample | |||||||
| Spleen | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg | |
| Liver | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | |
| Lung | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg | |
| Heart | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| Intestine | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| Colon | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| Bladder | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| Kidney | Neg | Pos | – | Pos | Neg | Neg | |
| Mesenteric lymph node | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | |
| Auxiliary lymph node | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg | |
| Inguinal lymph node | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg | Pos | Neg | |
| Spinal cord | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | |
| Brain (distal) | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | |
| Brain (medium) | Neg | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| Brain (frontal) | Neg | Pos | Neg | Pos | Pos | Neg | |
| Cerebellum | Neg | Pos | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| Urine | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| Plasma | – | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
| PBMC (day of analysis§) | Neg | Pos (D9, 12) | Neg | Pos (D3) | Pos (D2, 8) | Pos (D2) | |
*Neg, negative; pos, positive; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell †Early systemic euthanasia. ‡Death caused by NiV infection. §Day postinfection when cells were obtained for the test.
FigurePathologic signs associated with Nipah virus infection in squirrel monkeys. A) Focal inflammation in the lung (monkey B). Hematoxylin and eosin stains; original magnification ×10. B) Viral antigens (brown staining) were immunolocalized to the alveolar walls (monkey E). C) brain neuron (monkey B). D) Tubular and extratubular cells in the kidney (monkey E). E) Lymphoid cells in the spleen (monkey D). B–E, immunoperoxidase stains, original magnification ×20.
Detection of anti–Nipah virus antibodies in 12 squirrel monkeys by ELISA and seroneutralization assay*
| Monkey | Mode of infection† | Serology‡ | Day postinfection | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 or 4 | 8 or 9 | 12 | 17 | 30 | 37 | 52 or 56 | |||
| A§ | IV 103 | IgM | – | Neg | ||||||
| IV 103 | IgG | – | Neg | |||||||
|
| IV 103 | Neutralization | – | Neg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| B¶ | IV 103 | IgM | Neg | – | Neg | 0.396 | ||||
| IV 103 | IgG | Neg | – | Neg | Neg | |||||
|
| IV 103 | Neutralization | Neg | – | Neg | Neg |
|
|
|
|
| C¶ | IV 103 | IgM | Neg | – | 0.664 | – | – | |||
| IV 103 | IgG | Neg | – | Neg | – | – | ||||
|
| IV 103 | Neutralization | Neg | – | Neg | – | – |
|
|
|
| D§ | IV 107 | IgM | – | Neg | ||||||
| IV 107 | IgG | – | Neg | |||||||
|
| IV 107 | Neutralization | – | Neg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| E¶ | IV 107 | IgM | Neg | – | 1.343 | |||||
| IV 107 | IgG | Neg | – | 0.562 | ||||||
|
| IV 107 | Neutralization | Neg | – | 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
| F | IV 107 | IgM | Neg | – | 1.550 | – | – | 0.374 | – | 0.175 |
| IV 107 | IgG | Neg | – | 0.369 | – | – | 2.867 | – | 3.023 | |
|
| IV 107 | Neutralization | Neg | – | 80 | – | – | >1,280 | – | >1,280 |
| G§ | IN 103 | IgM | Neg | Neg | ||||||
| IN 103 | IgG | Neg | Neg | |||||||
|
| IN 103 | Neutralization | Neg | Neg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| H | IN 103 | IgM | – | – | Neg | – | – | Neg | – | Neg |
| IN 103 | IgG | – | – | Neg | – | – | Neg | – | Neg | |
|
| IN 103 | Neutralization | – | – | Neg | – | – | Neg | – | Neg |
| I | IN 103 | IgM | – | – | Neg | – | – | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| IN 103 | IgG | – | – | Neg | – | – | Neg | Neg | Neg | |
|
| IN 103 | Neutralization | – | – | Neg | – | – | Neg | Neg | Neg |
| J§ | IN 107 | IgM | – | Neg | ||||||
| IN 107 | IgG | – | Neg | |||||||
|
| IN 107 | Neutralization | – | Neg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| K | IN 107 | IgM | Neg | – | – | – | 0.286 | |||
| IN 107 | IgG | Neg | – | – | – | 1.757 | ||||
|
| IN 107 | Neutralization | Neg | – | – | – | 80 |
|
|
|
| L | IN 107 | IgM | – | – | 0.375 | 0.248 | Neg | |||
| IN 107 | IgG | – | – | Neg | 2.078 | 2.308 | ||||
| IN 107 | Neutralization | – | – | Neg | 320 | 320 | ||||
*IV, intravenous; Ig, immunoglobulin; IN, intranasal; dpi, days postinfection. †Mode of infection and delivered viral dose (in PFU). ‡IgG and IgM antibodies were determined by ELISA and results are presented as absorbance readings. Neutralization titers are expressed as reciprocal values of 2-fold serum dilutions required to completely inhibit cytopathic effect of 25 PFU of Nipah virus on Vero cells. §Early systemic euthanasia: 3 dpi (A and D) or 4 dpi (G and J). ¶Death caused by Nipah virus infection, B: 12 dpi, C: 21 dpi, and E: 8 dpi.