Literature DB >> 20202432

Experimental infection of squirrel monkeys with nipah virus.

Philippe Marianneau1, Vanessa Guillaume, Thong Wong, Munisamy Badmanathan, Ren Yih Looi, Severine Murri, Philippe Loth, Noel Tordo, Fabian Wild, Branka Horvat, Hugues Contamin.   

Abstract

We infected squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) with Nipah virus to determine the monkeys' suitability for use as primate models in preclinical testing of preventive and therapeutic treatments. Infection of squirrel monkeys through intravenous injection was followed by high death rates associated with acute neurologic and respiratory illness and viral RNA and antigen production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20202432      PMCID: PMC3322034          DOI: 10.3201/eid1603.091346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Nipah virus (NiV) is a highly pathogenic zoonotic paramyxovirus that was first identified in Malaysia and Singapore in 1999 (). Since the initial outbreak, NiV has been associated with human illness in Bangladesh and India () and was classified, together with the closely related Hendra virus, in the genus Henipavirus. Reported human death rates varied from 40%–92% (), and some outbreaks were associated with human-to-human transmission (). Most human infections led to encephalitis with vasculitis-induced thrombosis in the brain and atypical pneumonia in certain patients (,). Because of the lack of efficient treatment or a vaccine for Nipah virus and the high pathogenicity of the virus in humans, the manipulation of NiV requires BioSafety Level 4 (BSL-4) conditions. Several species of fruit bats of the genus Pteropus are considered natural reservoirs of henipaviruses, although the disease does not develop in them (). Pigs were responsible for amplifying the NiV infection in Malaysia, but their death rate was only 10%–15%. Laboratory infection of piglets caused development of neurologic signs in some animals, and NiV was detected in different tissues (). Hamsters in laboratory studies are highly susceptible to NiV, and infection develops in multiple organs, including the brain (). Cats infected with NiV in the laboratory reproduce the disease observed in naturally infected cats, including a severe respiratory and systemic disease, 6–13 days after infection (). However, to our knowledge, a primate model necessary for preclinical testing of preventive and therapeutic approaches has not been described. We therefore assessed the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) as an experimental model of NiV infection.

The Study

We selected these New World monkeys because of their availability, reliability as a primate model with which to study infectious diseases (), and suitability as experimental animals in BSL-4 conditions. Thirteen 4-year-old male monkeys (0.8–1.0 kg) were imported from a breeding colony in French Guiana and housed in the BSL-4 animal care facility in Lyon. Experimental methods were approved by the Région Rhône Alpes ethics committee. Twelve monkeys were infected with NiV isolate UMMC1 (), GenBank accession no. AY029767, either intravenously or intranasally; for both modes of infection either 103 or 107 PFU was used. Animals were observed daily for 2 months for signs of disease onset; tissues were taken during the infection and at necropsy or at the end of experiment (Table 1). Blood samples were collected at different time points, serum samples were used for antibody analysis, and peripheral blood cells (PBMC) were used for RNA isolation. Different organ samples were taken and frozen at –80°C for RNA isolation or fixed in 4% formalin for histopathologic studies.
Table 1

Clinical course of Nipah virus infection in 12 squirrel monkeys*

MonkeyMode of
infectionDose, PFU/mLDay of 1st symptomsDuration of clinical stateDay of euthanasiaClinical state at euthanasiaClinical signs
A†IV1033WellNone
BIV10310312†MoribundUncoordinated motor movements, prostration and coma
CIV10319321‡MoribundUncoordinated motor movements, prostration, and coma
D†IV1073WellNone
EIV107728†MoribundUncoordinated motor movements, prostration, and coma
FIV10714352Recovered/wellAnorexia, depression
G†IN1034WellNone
HIN10352WellNone
IIN1038356Recovered/wellAnorexia, seizure
J†IN1074WellNone
KIN10717Septic shock not correlated with NiV infection
LIN10710756Recovered/wellAnorexia, seizure, edema of eyes

*IV, intravenous; IN, intranasal; NiV, Nipah virus.
†Early systematic euthanasia.
‡Death caused by NiV infection.

*IV, intravenous; IN, intranasal; NiV, Nipah virus.
†Early systematic euthanasia.
‡Death caused by NiV infection. RNA was extracted from different organs and analyzed by 1-step RT-PCR by using high fidelity PCR enzyme blend (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) for NiV nucleoprotein expression as described (). Detection of NiV-specific antibodies in the serum was performed simultaneously for all samples by ELISA and virus neutralization assays as described (). Immunohistochemical analysis was conducted on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues as described (). Onset of clinical illness was observed between 7 and 19 days postinfection (dpi), with development in the animals of anorexia, weight loss, and depression (characterized by slumped, collapsed body posture and lack of responsiveness to the environmental triggers). These clinical signs progressed for several hours and were associated with hyperthermia and an acute respiratory syndrome characterized by dyspnea and hyperventilation. During the course of the disease, the animals became more obtunded and had uncoordinated motor movements, ending, in some instances, with a loss of consciousness and coma (Table 1). Although clinical signs were seen in monkeys infected intranasally and intravenously, the disease lasted longer in intranasally infected animals (7 days) than in intravenously infected monkeys (2–3 days). With the latter, death was observed in 3 of 4 animals in which the disease was allowed to proceed. Clinical signs of illness for intranasally infected monkeys were milder and seen only in 2 of 4 animals before recovery after 3–7 days of illness. Clinical signs observed in monkeys appear to be similar to those reported for human infection, including involvement of neurologic and respiratory systems. In addition, the incubation period for the acute human infection in Malaysia was estimated to be from a few days to 2 weeks, total duration of illness ranged 2–34 days, and the rate of subclinical infection was ≈25% (,). It is possible that the inclusion of more animals in the study would have given higher heterogeneity in the course of disease, as seen in humans. Intravenous infection was much more efficient than the intranasal route in monkeys, probably because of a better delivery of the virus to different tissues. NiV-specific RNA was detected in various organs only in intravenously infected animals (Table A1), demonstrating a differential virus spread, depending on time after infection and virus dose. Early detection after infection (3 dpi) was possible only in animal D, which was infected with a high dose of NiV. Animal F, which recovered from the disease, although positive for NiV (by RT-PCR) in the PBMC sample 2 dpi, was negative after necropsy on day 52, when virus was probably eliminated from the monkey. Detection of viral RNA in different tissues (liver, brain, spleen, kidney, lung, lymph nodes) early after infection suggests a rapid propagation of NiV and tropism for various tissues. Viral RNA was found in PBMC taken at different time points after infection, suggesting the role of these cells in viral propagation in the monkey. In contrast to what has been observed in hamsters (), viral RNA was not detected in any urine samples from analyzed animals, thus excluding urine as a possible mode of virus dissemination in this species.
Table A1

Detection of Nipah virus specific RNA by RT-PCR in organs from intravenously infected animals*

Infectious dose103 PFU
107 PFU
Animal number
A†
B‡
C‡
D†
E‡
F
Day euthanized
3
12
21
3
8
52
Source of sample
SpleenNegPosNegPosPosNeg
LiverNegPosPosNegPosNeg
LungNegPosNegPosPosNeg
HeartNegPosNegNegNegNeg
IntestineNegNegNegNegNegNeg
ColonNegNegNegNegNegNeg
BladderNegPosNegNegNegNeg
KidneyNegPosPosNegNeg
Mesenteric lymph nodeNegPosNegNegPosNeg
Auxiliary lymph nodeNegNegNegPosPosNeg
Inguinal lymph nodeNegPosPosNegPosNeg
Spinal cordNegNegNegNegPosNeg
Brain (distal)NegPosNegNegPosNeg
Brain (medium)NegNegPosNegNegNeg
Brain (frontal)NegPosNegPosPosNeg
CerebellumNegPosNegNegNegNeg
UrineNegNegNegNegNegNeg
PlasmaNegNegNegNegNeg
PBMC (day of analysis§)NegPos (D9, 12)NegPos (D3)Pos (D2, 8)Pos (D2)

*Neg, negative; pos, positive; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell
†Early systemic euthanasia.
‡Death caused by NiV infection.
§Day postinfection when cells were obtained for the test.

Monkeys showed mild histologic lesions, including the inflammation most obvious in the lung parenchyma (Figure, panel A). In contrast to human infection, vasculitis and brain abnormalities were much less evident. However, immunohistochemistry showed viral antigens immunolocalized to the brain, lung, spleen, and kidney extravascular parenchyma, thus confirming viral infection in these organs (Figure, panels B–E).
Figure

Pathologic signs associated with Nipah virus infection in squirrel monkeys. A) Focal inflammation in the lung (monkey B). Hematoxylin and eosin stains; original magnification ×10. B) Viral antigens (brown staining) were immunolocalized to the alveolar walls (monkey E). C) brain neuron (monkey B). D) Tubular and extratubular cells in the kidney (monkey E). E) Lymphoid cells in the spleen (monkey D). B–E, immunoperoxidase stains, original magnification ×20.

Pathologic signs associated with Nipah virus infection in squirrel monkeys. A) Focal inflammation in the lung (monkey B). Hematoxylin and eosin stains; original magnification ×10. B) Viral antigens (brown staining) were immunolocalized to the alveolar walls (monkey E). C) brain neuron (monkey B). D) Tubular and extratubular cells in the kidney (monkey E). E) Lymphoid cells in the spleen (monkey D). B–E, immunoperoxidase stains, original magnification ×20. NiV-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) M responses were observed starting from 8 dpi for all monkeys except in groups H and I (Table 2). This finding suggests that 103 PFU of NiV delivered intranasally was probably insufficient to induce infection in monkeys. Although NiV-specific antibodies were detected by ELISA in animals dying from the infection, sufficient titers of neutralizing antibodies did not develop in these monkeys and they were therefore not protected. These findings suggest the protective role of high neutralization titers in NiV infection. Our results agree with other studies of NiV infection that reported most human patients with fatal NiV infection had IgG and IgM in their serum and cerebrospinal fluid (,); neutralization titers were not analyzed in those studies.
Table 2

Detection of anti–Nipah virus antibodies in 12 squirrel monkeys by ELISA and seroneutralization assay*

MonkeyMode of infection†Serology‡Day postinfection
23 or 48 or 91217303752 or 56
IV 103IgMNeg
IV 103IgGNeg

IV 103
Neutralization

Neg






IV 103IgMNegNeg0.396
IV 103IgGNegNegNeg

IV 103
Neutralization
Neg

Neg
Neg




IV 103IgMNeg0.664
IV 103IgGNegNeg

IV 103
Neutralization
Neg

Neg





IV 107IgMNeg
IV 107IgGNeg

IV 107
Neutralization

Neg






IV 107IgMNeg1.343
IV 107IgGNeg0.562

IV 107
Neutralization
Neg

40





FIV 107IgMNeg1.5500.3740.175
IV 107IgGNeg0.3692.8673.023

IV 107
Neutralization
Neg

80


>1,280

>1,280
IN 103IgMNegNeg
IN 103IgGNegNeg

IN 103
Neutralization
Neg
Neg






HIN 103IgMNegNegNeg
IN 103IgGNegNegNeg

IN 103
Neutralization


Neg


Neg

Neg
IIN 103IgMNegNegNegNeg
IN 103IgGNegNegNegNeg

IN 103
Neutralization


Neg


Neg
Neg
Neg
IN 107IgMNeg
IN 107IgGNeg

IN 107
Neutralization

Neg






KIN 107IgMNeg0.286
IN 107IgGNeg1.757

IN 107
Neutralization
Neg



80



LIN 107IgM0.3750.248Neg
IN 107IgGNeg2.0782.308
IN 107NeutralizationNeg320320

*IV, intravenous; Ig, immunoglobulin; IN, intranasal; dpi, days postinfection.
†Mode of infection and delivered viral dose (in PFU).
‡IgG and IgM antibodies were determined by ELISA and results are presented as absorbance readings. Neutralization titers are expressed as reciprocal values of 2-fold serum dilutions required to completely inhibit cytopathic effect of 25 PFU of Nipah virus on Vero cells.
§Early systemic euthanasia: 3 dpi (A and D) or 4 dpi (G and J).
¶Death caused by Nipah virus infection, B: 12 dpi, C: 21 dpi, and E: 8 dpi.

*IV, intravenous; Ig, immunoglobulin; IN, intranasal; dpi, days postinfection.
†Mode of infection and delivered viral dose (in PFU).
‡IgG and IgM antibodies were determined by ELISA and results are presented as absorbance readings. Neutralization titers are expressed as reciprocal values of 2-fold serum dilutions required to completely inhibit cytopathic effect of 25 PFU of Nipah virus on Vero cells.
§Early systemic euthanasia: 3 dpi (A and D) or 4 dpi (G and J).
¶Death caused by Nipah virus infection, B: 12 dpi, C: 21 dpi, and E: 8 dpi. Our results suggest some similarities of NiV pathogenesis in humans and squirrel monkeys, including development of clinical signs, progression of infection, and humoral immune response. We conclude that the squirrel monkey can be used as an animal model for experimental studies of NiV infection, and these results pave the way for further study.
  15 in total

1.  Isolation of Nipah virus from Malaysian Island flying-foxes.

Authors:  Kaw Bing Chua; Chong Lek Koh; Poh Sim Hooi; Kong Fatt Wee; Jenn Hui Khong; Beng Hooi Chua; Yee Peng Chan; Mou Eng Lim; Sai Kit Lam
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.700

2.  Nipah virus infection: pathology and pathogenesis of an emerging paramyxoviral zoonosis.

Authors:  Kum Thong Wong; Wun-Ju Shieh; Shalini Kumar; Karim Norain; Wahidah Abdullah; Jeannette Guarner; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Kaw Bing Chua; Sai Kit Lam; Chong Tin Tan; Khean Jin Goh; Heng Thay Chong; Rani Jusoh; Pierre E Rollin; Thomas G Ksiazek; Sherif R Zaki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Antibody prophylaxis and therapy against Nipah virus infection in hamsters.

Authors:  V Guillaume; H Contamin; P Loth; I Grosjean; M C Georges Courbot; V Deubel; R Buckland; T F Wild
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Fatal encephalitis due to Nipah virus among pig-farmers in Malaysia.

Authors:  K B Chua; K J Goh; K T Wong; A Kamarulzaman; P S Tan; T G Ksiazek; S R Zaki; G Paul; S K Lam; C T Tan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Plasmodium falciparumin the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus): infection of non-splenectomised animals as a model for exploring clinical manifestations of malaria.

Authors:  H Contamin; C Behr; O Mercereau-Puijalon; J Michel
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.700

6.  Feline model of acute nipah virus infection and protection with a soluble glycoprotein-based subunit vaccine.

Authors:  Bruce A Mungall; Deborah Middleton; Gary Crameri; John Bingham; Kim Halpin; Gail Russell; Diane Green; Jennifer McEachern; L Ian Pritchard; Bryan T Eaton; Lin-Fa Wang; Katharine N Bossart; Christopher C Broder
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  A golden hamster model for human acute Nipah virus infection.

Authors:  K Thong Wong; Isabelle Grosjean; Christine Brisson; Barissa Blanquier; Michelle Fevre-Montange; Arlette Bernard; Philippe Loth; Marie-Claude Georges-Courbot; Michelle Chevallier; Hideo Akaoka; Philippe Marianneau; Sai Kit Lam; T Fabian Wild; Vincent Deubel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Foodborne transmission of Nipah virus, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Stephen P Luby; Mahmudur Rahman; M Jahangir Hossain; Lauren S Blum; M Mushtaq Husain; Emily Gurley; Rasheda Khan; Be-Nazir Ahmed; Shafiqur Rahman; Nazmun Nahar; Eben Kenah; James A Comer; Thomas G Ksiazek
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Genetic characterization of Nipah virus, Bangladesh, 2004.

Authors:  Brian H Harcourt; Luis Lowe; Azaibi Tamin; Xin Liu; Bettina Bankamp; Nadine Bowden; Pierre E Rollin; James A Comer; Thomas G Ksiazek; Mohammed Jahangir Hossain; Emily S Gurley; Robert F Breiman; William J Bellini; Paul A Rota
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Nipah virus-associated encephalitis outbreak, Siliguri, India.

Authors:  Mandeep S Chadha; James A Comer; Luis Lowe; Paul A Rota; Pierre E Rollin; William J Bellini; Thomas G Ksiazek; Akhilesh Mishra
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Endemic Viruses of Squirrel Monkeys (Saimiri spp.).

Authors:  Donna L Rogers; Gloria B McClure; Julio C Ruiz; Christian R Abee; John A Vanchiere
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 2.  Hendra and nipah infection: pathology, models and potential therapies.

Authors:  Frederic Vigant; Benhur Lee
Journal:  Infect Disord Drug Targets       Date:  2011-06

3.  Nectin-4 Interactions Govern Measles Virus Virulence in a New Model of Pathogenesis, the Squirrel Monkey (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  Sébastien Delpeut; Bevan Sawatsky; Xiao-Xiang Wong; Marie Frenzke; Roberto Cattaneo; Veronika von Messling
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Hendra virus and Nipah virus animal vaccines.

Authors:  Christopher C Broder; Dawn L Weir; Peter A Reid
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  Henipavirus outbreaks to antivirals: the current status of potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Christopher C Broder
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 6.  Immunization strategies against henipaviruses.

Authors:  Christopher C Broder; Thomas W Geisbert; Kai Xu; Dimitar B Nikolov; Lin-Fa Wang; Deborah Middleton; Jackie Pallister; Katharine N Bossart
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Development of an acute and highly pathogenic nonhuman primate model of Nipah virus infection.

Authors:  Thomas W Geisbert; Kathleen M Daddario-DiCaprio; Andrew C Hickey; Mark A Smith; Yee-Peng Chan; Lin-Fa Wang; Joseph J Mattapallil; Joan B Geisbert; Katharine N Bossart; Christopher C Broder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inhibition of Nipah virus infection in vivo: targeting an early stage of paramyxovirus fusion activation during viral entry.

Authors:  Matteo Porotto; Barry Rockx; Christine C Yokoyama; Aparna Talekar; Ilaria Devito; Laura M Palermo; Jie Liu; Riccardo Cortese; Min Lu; Heinz Feldmann; Antonello Pessi; Anne Moscona
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Nipah virus infection: current scenario.

Authors:  D D Kulkarni; C Tosh; G Venkatesh; D Senthil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Virol       Date:  2013-11-07

10.  Nonstructural Nipah virus C protein regulates both the early host proinflammatory response and viral virulence.

Authors:  Cyrille Mathieu; Vanessa Guillaume; Valentina A Volchkova; Christine Pohl; Frederique Jacquot; Ren Yih Looi; Kum Thong Wong; Catherine Legras-Lachuer; Viktor E Volchkov; Joel Lachuer; Branka Horvat
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.