Literature DB >> 20199799

Mass balance soil ingestion estimating methods and their application to inhabitants of rural and wilderness areas: a critical review.

James R Doyle1, Jules M Blais, Paul A White.   

Abstract

Quantitative soil ingestion studies employing a mass balance tracer approach have been used to provide a defensible means to estimate soil ingestion for human health risk assessments. Past studies have focused on soil ingestion in populations living in urban/suburban environments. There is a paucity of reliable quantitative soil ingestion data to support human health risk assessments of other lifestyles that may be predisposed to ingesting soil, such as agricultural workers or indigenous populations following traditional lifestyles. The results of a preliminary analysis of sampling and analytical variability that would result from assessing activities typical of populations in rural or wilderness areas and conducted over wide areas show that approximately 225 subject days would be required to detect a difference of 20mg/d in soil ingestion. Given the typically small populations in these areas, future soil ingestion studies should be focused on specific activities with a high potential for soil ingestion. Crown Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20199799     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Estimation of the daily soil/dust (SD) ingestion rate of children from Gansu Province, China via hand-to-mouth contact using tracer elements.

Authors:  Jin Ma; Li-Bo Pan; Qin Wang; Chun-Ye Lin; Xiao-Li Duan; Hong Hou
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Probabilistic estimates of prenatal lead exposure at 195 toxic hotspots in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Lauren Zajac; Roni W Kobrosly; Bret Ericson; Jack Caravanos; Philip J Landrigan; Anne M Riederer
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Estimation of Children's Soil and Dust Ingestion Rates and Health Risk at E-Waste Dismantling Area.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Mengdi Zhang; Haojia Chen; Zenghua Qi; Chengcheng Liu; Qiang Chen; Tao Long
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Model based prediction of age-specific soil and dust ingestion rates for children.

Authors:  Haluk Özkaynak; Graham Glen; Jonathan Cohen; Heidi Hubbard; Kent Thomas; Linda Phillips; Nicolle Tulve
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.371

5.  Human exposure to soil contaminants in subarctic Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Ellen Stephanie Reyes; Eric Nicholas Liberda; Leonard James S Tsuji
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 1.228

6.  Cancer risk to First Nations' people from exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons near in-situ bitumen extraction in Cold Lake, Alberta.

Authors:  Graham M Irvine; Jules M Blais; James R Doyle; Linda E Kimpe; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  A comparison of arsenic exposure in young children and home water arsenic in two rural West Texas communities.

Authors:  Michelle Del Rio; Juan Alvarez; Tania Mayorga; Salvador Dominguez; Christina Sobin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Estimates of Soil Ingestion in a Population of Chinese Children.

Authors:  Chunye Lin; Beibei Wang; Xiaoyong Cui; Dongqun Xu; Hongguang Cheng; Qin Wang; Jin Ma; Tuanyao Chai; Xiaoli Duan; Xitao Liu; Junwei Ma; Xuan Zhang; Yanzhong Liu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Estimating Children's Soil/Dust Ingestion Rates through Retrospective Analyses of Blood Lead Biomonitoring from the Bunker Hill Superfund Site in Idaho.

Authors:  Ian von Lindern; Susan Spalinger; Marc L Stifelman; Lindsay Wichers Stanek; Casey Bartrem
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.