Literature DB >> 20198513

Use of EEG monitoring and management of non-convulsive seizures in critically ill patients: a survey of neurologists.

Nicholas S Abend1, Dennis J Dlugos, Cecil D Hahn, Lawrence J Hirsch, Susan T Herman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG) of critically ill patients is frequently utilized to detect non-convulsive seizures (NCS) and status epilepticus (NCSE). The indications for cEEG, as well as when and how to treat NCS, remain unclear. We aimed to describe the current practice of cEEG in critically ill patients to define areas of uncertainty that could aid in designing future research.
METHODS: We conducted an international survey of neurologists focused on cEEG utilization and NCS management.
RESULTS: Three-hundred and thirty physicians completed the survey. 83% use cEEG at least once per month and 86% manage NCS at least five times per year. The use of cEEG in patients with altered mental status was common (69%), with higher use if the patient had a prior convulsion (89%) or abnormal eye movements (85%). Most respondents would continue cEEG for 24 h. If NCS or NCSE is identified, the most common anticonvulsants administered were phenytoin/fosphenytoin, lorazepam, or levetiracetam, with slightly more use of levetiracetam for NCS than NCSE.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG) is commonly employed in critically ill patients to detect NCS and NCSE. However, there is substantial variability in current practice related to cEEG indications and duration and to management of NCS and NCSE. The fact that such variability exists in the management of this common clinical problem suggests that further prospective study is needed. Multiple points of uncertainty are identified that require investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20198513      PMCID: PMC2944658          DOI: 10.1007/s12028-010-9337-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  29 in total

Review 1.  Which EEG patterns warrant treatment in the critically ill? Reviewing the evidence for treatment of periodic epileptiform discharges and related patterns.

Authors:  Derek J Chong; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.177

2.  Prognostic significance of continuous EEG monitoring in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Lawrence J Hirsch; Jennifer A Frontera; Andres Fernandez; Michael Schmidt; Gregory Kapinos; John Wittman; E Sander Connolly; Ronald G Emerson; Stephan A Mayer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  Neurophysiologic monitoring in the neuroscience intensive care unit.

Authors:  K G Jordan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit: early findings and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  P M Vespa; V Nenov; M R Nuwer
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.177

5.  An assessment of nonconvulsive seizures in the intensive care unit using continuous EEG monitoring: an investigation of variables associated with mortality.

Authors:  G B Young; K G Jordan; G S Doig
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Electroencephalographic patterns in unresponsive pediatric patients.

Authors:  Syed A Hosain; Gail E Solomon; Erik J Kobylarz
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in children: clinical and EEG characteristics.

Authors:  Stacey K H Tay; Lawrence J Hirsch; Linda Leary; Nathalie Jette; John Wittman; Cigdem I Akman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Persistent nonconvulsive status epilepticus after the control of convulsive status epilepticus.

Authors:  R J DeLorenzo; E J Waterhouse; A R Towne; J G Boggs; D Ko; G A DeLorenzo; A Brown; L Garnett
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.864

9.  Digital video-electroencephalographic monitoring in the neurological-neurosurgical intensive care unit: clinical features and outcome.

Authors:  Jeyaraj D Pandian; Gregory D Cascino; Elson L So; Edward Manno; Jimmy R Fulgham
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-07

Review 10.  Detection of electrographic seizures with continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Claassen; S A Mayer; R G Kowalski; R G Emerson; L J Hirsch
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Kennedy; Elizabeth E Gerard
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Continuous EEG is associated with favorable hospitalization outcomes for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Chloe E Hill; Leah J Blank; Dylan Thibault; Kathryn A Davis; Nabila Dahodwala; Brian Litt; Allison W Willis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Electrographic status epilepticus and neurobehavioral outcomes in critically ill children.

Authors:  Nicholas S Abend; Katherine L Wagenman; Taylor P Blake; Maria T Schultheis; Jerilynn Radcliffe; Robert A Berg; Alexis A Topjian; Dennis J Dlugos
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 4.  Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Fabio S Taccone; Peter Horn; Martin Holtkamp; Nino Stocchetti; Mauro Oddo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  A Review of the Effectiveness of Neuroimaging Modalities for the Detection of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Franck Amyot; David B Arciniegas; Michael P Brazaitis; Kenneth C Curley; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Amir Gandjbakhche; Peter Herscovitch; Sidney R Hinds; Geoffrey T Manley; Anthony Pacifico; Alexander Razumovsky; Jason Riley; Wanda Salzer; Robert Shih; James G Smirniotopoulos; Derek Stocker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Use of EEG in critically ill children and neonates in the United States of America.

Authors:  Marina Gaínza-Lein; Iván Sánchez Fernández; Tobias Loddenkemper
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Variation in Anticonvulsant Selection and Electroencephalographic Monitoring Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children-Understanding Resource Availability in Sites Participating in a Comparative Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kurz; Samuel M Poloyac; Nicholas S Abend; Anthony Fabio; Michael J Bell; Mark S Wainwright
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.624

8.  Electroencephalographic inverse localization of brain activity in acute traumatic brain injury as a guide to surgery, monitoring and treatment.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; S-Y Matthew Goh; Carinna M Torgerson; Nathan R Stein; Micah C Chambers; Paul M Vespa; John D Van Horn
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children: Management and adverse events.

Authors:  France W Fung; Marin Jacobwitz; Lisa Vala; Darshana Parikh; Maureen Donnelly; Rui Xiao; Alexis A Topjian; Nicholas S Abend
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 10.  Physiological monitoring of the severe traumatic brain injury patient in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.