Literature DB >> 20198510

Electrically active bioceramics: a review of interfacial responses.

F R Baxter1, C R Bowen, I G Turner, A C E Dent.   

Abstract

Electrical potentials in mechanically loaded bone have been implicated as signals in the bone remodeling cycle. Recently, interest has grown in exploiting this phenomenon to develop electrically active ceramics for implantation in hard tissue which may induce improved biological responses. Both polarized hydroxyapatite (HA), whose surface charge is not dependent on loading, and piezoelectric ceramics, which produce electrical potentials under stress, have been studied in order to determine the possible benefits of using electrically active bioceramics as implant materials. The polarization of HA has a positive influence on interfacial responses to the ceramic. In vivo studies of polarized HA have shown polarized samples to induce improvements in bone ingrowth. The majority of piezoelectric ceramics proposed for implant use contain barium titanate (BaTiO(3)). In vivo and in vitro investigations have indicated that such ceramics are biocompatible and, under appropriate mechanical loading, induce improved bone formation around implants. The mechanism by which electrical activity influences biological responses is yet to be clearly defined, but is likely to result from preferential adsorption of proteins and ions onto the polarized surface. Further investigation is warranted into the use of electrically active ceramics as the indications are that they have benefits over existing implant materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20198510     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-9977-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  12 in total

1.  Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride-Trifluorethylene)/barium titanate membrane promotes de novo bone formation and may modulate gene expression in osteoporotic rat model.

Authors:  Priscilla Hakime Scalize; Karina F Bombonato-Prado; Luiz Gustavo de Sousa; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Marcio Mateus Beloti; Marisa Semprini; Rossano Gimenes; Adriana L G de Almeida; Fabíola Singaretti de Oliveira; Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo; Selma Siessere
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effect of Biomaterial Electrical Charge on Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Induced In Vivo Bone Formation.

Authors:  Maurits G L Olthof; Diederik H R Kempen; Xifeng Liu; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Marianna A Tryfonidou; Michael J Yaszemski; Wouter J A Dhert; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Release Profiles from Complex Delivery Vehicles.

Authors:  Maurits G L Olthof; Marianna A Tryfonidou; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Wouter J A Dhert; Michael J Yaszemski; Diederik H R Kempen; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Effects of substrate conductivity on cell morphogenesis and proliferation using tailored, atomic layer deposition-grown ZnO thin films.

Authors:  Won Jin Choi; Jongjin Jung; Sujin Lee; Yoon Jang Chung; Cheol-Soo Yang; Young Kuk Lee; You-Seop Lee; Joung Kyu Park; Hyuk Wan Ko; Jeong-O Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Barium titanate nanoparticles and hypergravity stimulation improve differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts.

Authors:  Antonella Rocca; Attilio Marino; Veronica Rocca; Stefania Moscato; Giuseppe de Vito; Vincenzo Piazza; Barbara Mazzolai; Virgilio Mattoli; Thu Jennifer Ngo-Anh; Gianni Ciofani
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-01-08

6.  Sheets of vertically aligned BaTiO3 nanotubes reduce cell proliferation but not viability of NIH-3T3 cells.

Authors:  Marianna Giannini; Martina Giannaccini; Teresa Sibillano; Cinzia Giannini; Dun Liu; Zhigang Wang; Andrea Baù; Luciana Dente; Alfred Cuschieri; Vittoria Raffa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jaicy Jacob; Namdev More; Kiran Kalia; Govinda Kapusetti
Journal:  Inflamm Regen       Date:  2018-02-27

Review 8.  Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Sofia Municoy; María I Álvarez Echazú; Pablo E Antezana; Juan M Galdopórpora; Christian Olivetti; Andrea M Mebert; María L Foglia; María V Tuttolomondo; Gisela S Alvarez; John G Hardy; Martin F Desimone
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Electrically Conductive Materials: Opportunities and Challenges in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Azadeh Saberi; Farzaneh Jabbari; Payam Zarrintaj; Mohammad Reza Saeb; Masoud Mozafari
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-09-04

10.  A self-powered implantable and bioresorbable electrostimulation device for biofeedback bone fracture healing.

Authors:  Guang Yao; Lei Kang; Cuicui Li; Sihong Chen; Qian Wang; Junzhe Yang; Yin Long; Jun Li; Kangning Zhao; Weina Xu; Weibo Cai; Yuan Lin; Xudong Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.