Literature DB >> 20198128

DECISION UTILITY, THE BRAIN, AND PURSUIT OF HEDONIC GOALS.

Kent C Berridge1, J Wayne Aldridge.   

Abstract

How do brain representations of the utility of a hedonic goal guide decisions about whether to pursue it? Our focus here will be on brain mechanisms of reward utility operating at particular decision moments in life. Moments such as when you encounter an image, sound, scent or other cue associated in your past with a particular reward; or perhaps just vividly imagine that cue. Such a cue can often trigger a sudden motivational urge to pursue that goal, and sometimes a decision to do so. In drug addicts trying to quit, a cue for the addicted drug might trigger urges that rise to compulsive levels of intensity, despite prior commitments to abstain, leading to the decision to relapse into taking the drug again. Normal or addicted, the urge and decision may well have been lacking immediately before the cue was encountered. The decision to pursue the cued reward might never have happened if the cue had not been encountered. Why can such cues momentarily dominate decision making? The answer involves brain mesolimbic dopamine mechanisms that amplify the incentive salience of reward cues, selectively elevating decision utility to trigger "wanting" for the goal. We describe affective neuroscience studies of brain limbic generators of "wanting" that shed light on how cues trigger pursuit of their goals, both normally and even under intense conditions of irrational goal pursuit.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20198128      PMCID: PMC2830022          DOI: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.5.621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn        ISSN: 0278-016X


  48 in total

1.  A model of dual attitudes.

Authors:  T D Wilson; S Lindsey; T Y Schooler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists.

Authors:  A Dickinson; J Smith; J Mirenowicz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Brain reward circuitry and the regulation of energy balance.

Authors:  P Shizgal; S Fulton; B Woodside
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-12

Review 4.  Pleasures of the brain.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain.

Authors:  J OLDS; P MILNER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-12

6.  Ventral pallidum firing codes hedonic reward: when a bad taste turns good.

Authors:  Amy J Tindell; Kyle S Smith; Susana Peciña; Kent C Berridge; J Wayne Aldridge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect.

Authors:  Ap Dijksterhuis; Maarten W Bos; Loran F Nordgren; Rick B van Baaren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?

Authors:  K C Berridge; T E Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-12

9.  Opioid site in nucleus accumbens shell mediates eating and hedonic 'liking' for food: map based on microinjection Fos plumes.

Authors:  S Peciña; K C Berridge
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 24.137

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-29

2.  Cognitive manifestations of drinking-smoking associations: preliminary findings with a cross-primed Stroop task.

Authors:  Jason A Oliver; David J Drobes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Biological markers for anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD: A consensus statement. Part II: Neurochemistry, neurophysiology and neurocognition.

Authors:  Borwin Bandelow; David Baldwin; Marianna Abelli; Blanca Bolea-Alamanac; Michel Bourin; Samuel R Chamberlain; Eduardo Cinosi; Simon Davies; Katharina Domschke; Naomi Fineberg; Edna Grünblatt; Marek Jarema; Yong-Ku Kim; Eduard Maron; Vasileios Masdrakis; Olya Mikova; David Nutt; Stefano Pallanti; Stefano Pini; Andreas Ströhle; Florence Thibaut; Matilde M Vaghi; Eunsoo Won; Dirk Wedekind; Adam Wichniak; Jade Woolley; Peter Zwanzger; Peter Riederer
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Contributions of Philip Teitelbaum to affective neuroscience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Risk factors for heroin use following release from jail or prison in adults in a Central Appalachian state between 2012-2017.

Authors:  Kirsten Elin Smith; Adrian Archuleta; Michele Staton; Erin Winston
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Task-Demand-Dependent Neural Representation of Odor Information in the Olfactory Bulb and Posterior Piriform Cortex.

Authors:  Dejuan Wang; Penglai Liu; Xingfeng Mao; Zheng Zhou; Tiantian Cao; Jinshan Xu; Changcheng Sun; Anan Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Altered subjective reward valuation among drug-deprived heavy marijuana users: Aversion to uncertainty.

Authors:  Kathryn R Hefner; Mark J Starr; John J Curtin
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2015-11-23

8.  A Neural System that Represents the Association of Odors with Rewarded Outcomes and Promotes Behavioral Engagement.

Authors:  Marie A Gadziola; Lucas A Stetzik; Katherine N Wright; Adrianna J Milton; Keiko Arakawa; María Del Mar Cortijo; Daniel W Wesson
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Short-term quetiapine treatment alters the use of reinforcement signals during risky decision-making and promotes the choice of negative expected values in healthy adult males.

Authors:  Philippa L Rock; Catherine J Harmer; Sarah F B McTavish; Guy M Goodwin; Robert D Rogers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A neural computational model of incentive salience.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Kent C Berridge; Amy J Tindell; Kyle S Smith; J Wayne Aldridge
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.