Literature DB >> 20197041

Statistics and physical origins of pK and ionization state changes upon protein-ligand binding.

Boris Aguilar1, Ramu Anandakrishnan, Jory Z Ruscio, Alexey V Onufriev.   

Abstract

This work investigates statistical prevalence and overall physical origins of changes in charge states of receptor proteins upon ligand binding. These changes are explored as a function of the ligand type (small molecule, protein, and nucleic acid), and distance from the binding region. Standard continuum solvent methodology is used to compute, on an equal footing, pK changes upon ligand binding for a total of 5899 ionizable residues in 20 protein-protein, 20 protein-small molecule, and 20 protein-nucleic acid high-resolution complexes. The size of the data set combined with an extensive error and sensitivity analysis allows us to make statistically justified and conservative conclusions: in 60% of all protein-small molecule, 90% of all protein-protein, and 85% of all protein-nucleic acid complexes there exists at least one ionizable residue that changes its charge state upon ligand binding at physiological conditions (pH = 6.5). Considering the most biologically relevant pH range of 4-8, the number of ionizable residues that experience substantial pK changes (DeltapK > 1.0) due to ligand binding is appreciable: on average, 6% of all ionizable residues in protein-small molecule complexes, 9% in protein-protein, and 12% in protein-nucleic acid complexes experience a substantial pK change upon ligand binding. These changes are safely above the statistical false-positive noise level. Most of the changes occur in the immediate binding interface region, where approximately one out of five ionizable residues experiences substantial pK change regardless of the ligand type. However, the physical origins of the change differ between the types: in protein-nucleic acid complexes, the pK values of interface residues are predominantly affected by electrostatic effects, whereas in protein-protein and protein-small molecule complexes, structural changes due to the induced-fit effect play an equally important role. In protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid complexes, there is a statistically significant number of substantial pK perturbations, mostly due to the induced-fit structural changes, in regions far from the binding interface. 2010 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20197041      PMCID: PMC2830434          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  48 in total

1.  Structure and energetics of protein-protein interactions: the role of conformational heterogeneity in OMTKY3 binding to serine proteases.

Authors:  James R Horn; S Ramaswamy; Kenneth P Murphy
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Charge optimization of the interface between protein kinases and their ligands.

Authors:  Peter A Sims; Chung F Wong; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 4.  The many roles of computation in drug discovery.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  pKa's of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model.

Authors:  D Bashford; M Karplus
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-11-06       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Statistical analysis and prediction of protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Andrew J Bordner; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-08-15

7.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 8.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Michael K Gilson; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2007

9.  Analysis of basic clustering algorithms for numerical estimation of statistical averages in biomolecules.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Alexey Onufriev
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.479

10.  Large-scale analysis of secondary structure changes in proteins suggests a role for disorder-to-order transitions in nucleotide binding proteins.

Authors:  Adi Dan; Yanay Ofran; Yossef Kliger
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-02-01
View more
  21 in total

1.  Calculating pKa values in the cAMP-dependent protein kinase: the effect of conformational change and ligand binding.

Authors:  Una Bjarnadottir; Jens Erik Nielsen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  In silico investigation of pH-dependence of prolactin and human growth hormone binding to human prolactin receptor.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Shawn Witham; Zhe Zhang; Lin Li; Michael E Hodsdon; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Commun Comput Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Efficient implementation of constant pH molecular dynamics on modern graphics processors.

Authors:  Evan J Arthur; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Proton-Coupled Conformational Allostery Modulates the Inhibitor Selectivity for β-Secretase.

Authors:  Robert C Harris; Cheng-Chieh Tsai; Christopher R Ellis; Jana Shen
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Protonation and pK changes in protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Alexey V Onufriev; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.318

7.  SAMPL6 challenge results from [Formula: see text] predictions based on a general Gaussian process model.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; David L Mobley; A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Computation of pH-dependent binding free energies.

Authors:  M Olivia Kim; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation.

Authors:  Saeed Izadi; Boris Aguilar; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 10.  The role of protonation states in ligand-receptor recognition and binding.

Authors:  Marharyta Petukh; Shannon Stefl; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.