Literature DB >> 20195845

Oral contraceptive use and bone mass in women aged 26-36 years.

S Wei1, G Jones, R Thomson, T Dwyer, A Venn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The association between hormonal contraceptive use and bone mineral density remains controversial. HYPOTHESIS: Hormonal contraceptive use is positively associated with bone mass in young premenopausal women.
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected from women aged 26-36 years (n = 687) in the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study-a longitudinal study investigating childhood determinants of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and other chronic diseases in adulthood. Participants were not currently pregnant or breast-feeding. Contraceptive use was obtained by self-administered questionnaire. Women were categorized as combined oral contraceptive users (n = 219), progestogen-only contraceptive users (n = 43), and non-users of hormonal contraceptives (n = 425). Bone mass was measured by quantitative ultrasound.
RESULTS: Compared with women who were not using any hormonal contraceptives, women using combined oral contraceptives had significantly higher values of broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound, and quantitative ultrasound index. These associations remained after adjustment for confounders. Progestogen-only contraceptive users had higher BUA than non-users, but the differences were not statistically significant in this small group.
CONCLUSION: Combined oral contraceptive use was associated with higher bone mass measured by quantitative ultrasound in this population-based sample of premenopausal women aged 26-36 while progestogen-only contraceptives appeared to have no deleterious effect on bone mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195845     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1180-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  20 in total

1.  Oral contraceptives and bone mineral density in white and black women in CARDIA. Coronary Risk Development in Young Adults.

Authors:  K L Cobb; J L Kelsey; S Sidney; B Ettinger; C E Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Oral contraceptive use by teenage women does not affect peak bone mass: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  T Lloyd; D S Taylor; H M Lin; A E Matthews; D F Eggli; R S Legro
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Prediction of mechanical properties of the human calcaneus by broadband ultrasonic attenuation.

Authors:  C M Langton; C F Njeh; R Hodgskinson; J D Currey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Overview of the relationship between use of progestogen-only contraceptives and bone mineral density.

Authors:  E Banks; A Berrington; D Casabonne
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Steroid hormone contraception and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in an international population. The WHO Study of Hormonal Contraception and Bone Health.

Authors:  D B Petitti; G Piaggio; S Mehta; M C Cravioto; O Meirik
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Detrimental effect of oral contraceptives on parameters of bone mass and geometry in a cohort of 248 young women.

Authors:  Manfred Hartard; Christine Kleinmond; Michael Wiseman; Ernst R Weissenbacher; Dieter Felsenberg; Reinhold G Erben
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Norplant((R)) implants and progesterone vaginal rings do not affect maternal bone turnover and density during lactation and after weaning.

Authors:  S Díaz; M V Reyes; A Zepeda; G B González; J M López; C Campino; H B Croxatto
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The Australian Schools Health and Fitness Survey. Physical fitness related to blood pressure but not lipoproteins.

Authors:  T Dwyer; L E Gibbons
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study.

Authors:  Barbara A Cromer; Andrea E Bonny; Margaret Stager; Rina Lazebnik; Ellen Rome; Julie Ziegler; Kelly Camlin-Shingler; Michelle Secic
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  The influence of lifestyle, menstrual function and oral contraceptive use on bone mass and size in female military cadets.

Authors:  Jamie A Ruffing; Jeri W Nieves; Marsha Zion; Susan Tendy; Patricia Garrett; Robert Lindsay; Felicia Cosman
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.169

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Update on hormonal contraception and bone density.

Authors:  Michelle M Isley; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Short-term jump activity on bone metabolism in female college-aged nonathletes.

Authors:  Kohei Kishimoto; Ryan P Lynch; Jamie Reiger; Vanessa R Yingling
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.