Literature DB >> 10527977

Norplant((R)) implants and progesterone vaginal rings do not affect maternal bone turnover and density during lactation and after weaning.

S Díaz1, M V Reyes, A Zepeda, G B González, J M López, C Campino, H B Croxatto.   

Abstract

Bone density and turnover was assessed in a longitudinal study of healthy lactating women who initiated use of Norplant((R)) implants (NOR, n = 29), progesterone vaginal rings (PVR, n = 28) or Copper T 380A intrauterine devices (T-Cu, n = 51, control group) around day 60 postpartum. Bone density, serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatases, parathyroid hormone (PTH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol and prolactin, and urinary hydroxyproline and creatinine were measured at postpartum months 1 (PM1), and 12 (PM12) and 6 or 12 months after weaning; at month 6 postpartum (PM6) serum and urine tests alone were performed. Baseline characteristics and lactation performance were similar between groups. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were higher at PM1, PM6 and PM12 than after weaning, with no differences between groups. Bone density in the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck at PM1 and PM12 ( approximately 1.11 g/cm(2)) was similar in three groups. Lumbar spine values were found to be lower in lactating women than those present in non-lactating women, but increased after weaning to similar values. The two progestin-only contraceptives studied appear to have no deleterious effect upon bone density and metabolism in healthy lactating women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527977     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  4 in total

1.  Factors associated with bone mineral density in healthy African women.

Authors:  Nyaradzo M Mgodi; Cliff Kelly; Brenda Gati; Susan Greenspan; James Y Dai; Vivian Bragg; Edward Livant; Jeanna M Piper; Clemensia Nakabiito; Tsitsi Magure; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Z Mike Chirenje; Sharon A Riddler
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Oral contraceptive use and bone mass in women aged 26-36 years.

Authors:  S Wei; G Jones; R Thomson; T Dwyer; A Venn
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Authors:  Irving Sivin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  A three-year longitudinal evaluation of the forearm bone density of users of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Authors:  Cecilia Monteiro-Dantas; Ximena Espejo-Arce; Jeffrey F Lui-Filho; Arlete M Fernandes; Ilza Monteiro; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 3.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.