PURPOSE: Block copolymer micelles (BCMs) were functionalized with indium-111 and/or epidermal growth factor (EGF), which enabled investigation of the in vivo transport of passively and actively targeted BCMs. The integration of conventional and image-based techniques afforded novel quantitative means to achieve an in-depth insight into the fate of polymeric nanoparticles in vivo. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution studies were performed in athymic mice bearing human breast xenografts to evaluate the whole-body transport of NT-BCMs (non-targeted, EGF-) and T-BCMs (targeted, EGF+). The intratumoral distribution of BCMs was investigated using MicroSPECT/CT and autoradiographic imaging, complemented with quantitative MATLAB® analyses. Tumors were fractionated for quantifying intracellular uptake of BCMs via γ-counting. RESULTS: The intratumoral distribution of NT-BCMs and T-BCMs were found to be heterogeneous, and positively correlated with tumor vascularization (r>0.68 ± 0.04). The enhanced in vivo cell uptake and cell membrane binding of T-BCMs were found to delay their clearance from tumors overexpressing EGFR, and therefore resulted in enhanced tumor accumulation for the T-BCMs in comparison to the NT-BCMs. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate passive targeting is required in order to achieve effective active targeting. Tumor physiology has a significant impact on the transvascular and intratumoral transport of passively and actively targeted BCMs.
PURPOSE: Block copolymer micelles (BCMs) were functionalized with indium-111 and/or epidermal growth factor (EGF), which enabled investigation of the in vivo transport of passively and actively targeted BCMs. The integration of conventional and image-based techniques afforded novel quantitative means to achieve an in-depth insight into the fate of polymeric nanoparticles in vivo. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution studies were performed in athymic mice bearing human breast xenografts to evaluate the whole-body transport of NT-BCMs (non-targeted, EGF-) and T-BCMs (targeted, EGF+). The intratumoral distribution of BCMs was investigated using MicroSPECT/CT and autoradiographic imaging, complemented with quantitative MATLAB® analyses. Tumors were fractionated for quantifying intracellular uptake of BCMs via γ-counting. RESULTS: The intratumoral distribution of NT-BCMs and T-BCMs were found to be heterogeneous, and positively correlated with tumor vascularization (r>0.68 ± 0.04). The enhanced in vivo cell uptake and cell membrane binding of T-BCMs were found to delay their clearance from tumors overexpressing EGFR, and therefore resulted in enhanced tumor accumulation for the T-BCMs in comparison to the NT-BCMs. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate passive targeting is required in order to achieve effective active targeting. Tumor physiology has a significant impact on the transvascular and intratumoral transport of passively and actively targeted BCMs.
Authors: Ji Sun Park; Tae Hee Han; Kuen Yong Lee; Sung Soo Han; Jung Jin Hwang; Dae Hyuk Moon; Sang Yoon Kim; Yong Woo Cho Journal: J Control Release Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Christoph Mamot; Daryl C Drummond; Charles O Noble; Verena Kallab; Zexiong Guo; Keelung Hong; Dmitri B Kirpotin; John W Park Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Alberto Gabizon; Aviva T Horowitz; Dorit Goren; Dina Tzemach; Hilary Shmeeda; Samuel Zalipsky Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lei Miao; Jay M Newby; C Michael Lin; Lu Zhang; Feifei Xu; William Y Kim; M Gregory Forest; Samuel K Lai; Matthew I Milowsky; Sara E Wobker; Leaf Huang Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Greg M Thurber; Thomas Reiner; Katherine S Yang; Rainer H Kohler; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Chris Oerlemans; Wouter Bult; Mariska Bos; Gert Storm; J Frank W Nijsen; Wim E Hennink Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Natalie M Barkey; Christian Preihs; Heather H Cornnell; Gary Martinez; Adam Carie; Josef Vagner; Liping Xu; Mark C Lloyd; Vincent M Lynch; Victor J Hruby; Jonathan L Sessler; Kevin N Sill; Robert J Gillies; David L Morse Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 7.446