Literature DB >> 20195641

Standard versus video-assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation.

Paolo Miccoli1, Rocco Rago, Marco Massi, Erica Panicucci, Maria Rita Metelli, Piero Berti, Michele N Minuto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized study was designed to objectively demonstrate that minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) improves postoperative pain compared with standard thyroidectomy, via the dosage of biochemical mediators measured before and after surgery.
METHODS: Forty-nine patients undergoing total thyroidectomy were allotted to MIVAT (n = 23) or traditional thyroidectomy (OPEN) (n = 26) groups. At hospitalization (T0), interleukin (IL)-1, -2, -4, -6, -10, -3, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, TGF-β, and MCP-1 were measured. The basal pain tolerance also was evaluated by VAS. Blood samples for interleukin measurement and VAS evaluations were obtained from all patients in the recovery room (T1) and 24 h after surgery (T2).
RESULTS: At T0, the MIVAT and the OPEN groups were not different in terms of basal pain tolerance and biochemical profile. At T1, VAS scores were significantly higher (p = 0.04), whereas TGF-β (p = 0.03) and MCP-1 (p = 0.03) levels were significantly lower in the OPEN than in the MIVAT group. No significant difference was demonstrated for other interleukins. A significant inverse relationship between VAS and TGF-β was demonstrated and confirmed through the correlation (p = 0.003) and regression (p = 0.003, p < 0.0001, R (2) = 0.172) coefficients; the stepwise regression also demonstrated that TGF was the most predictive factor of postoperative pain (p = 0.0038) through an inverse relationship. No statistically significant difference has been demonstrated at T2.
CONCLUSIONS: TGF-β serum levels immediately after surgery seem to correlate with pain evaluation, confirming that reduced postoperative distress is an objective outcome of MIVAT. This result confirms the results of studies based only on subjective pain evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195641     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0964-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for follicular neoplasm: is there an advantage over conventional thyroidectomy?

Authors:  Michael B Ujiki; Cord Sturgeon; Daphne Denham; Linwah Yip; Peter Angelos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Effect of combined spa-exercise therapy on circulating TGF-beta1 levels in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Medhat Shehata; Josef D Schwarzmeier; Martin Hilgarth; Dita Demirtas; Dorothea Richter; Rainer Hubmann; Petra Boeck; Guenther Leiner; Albrecht Falkenbach
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation.

Authors:  Justin P Annes; John S Munger; Daniel B Rifkin
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  P Miccoli; P Berti; M Raffaelli; G Materazzi; S Baldacci; G Rossi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Upregulation of prostaglandin E2 and interleukins in the central nervous system and peripheral tissue during and after surgery in humans.

Authors:  Asokumar Buvanendran; Jeffrey S Kroin; Richard A Berger; Nadim J Hallab; Chiranjeev Saha; Corina Negrescu; Mario Moric; Marco S Caicedo; Kenneth J Tuman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Inflammatory response during abdominal and thyroid surgery: a prospective clinical trial on mediator release.

Authors:  E Bölke; P M Jehle; M Graf; A Baier; H Wiedeck; G Steinbach; M Storck; K Orth
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Comparative study of thyroidectomies. Endoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; H Takami; Y Sasaki; J Takayama; M Niimi; S Kan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Intraperitoneal cytokine response after major surgery: higher postoperative intraperitoneal versus systemic cytokine levels suggest the gastrointestinal tract as the major source of the postoperative inflammatory reaction.

Authors:  Kjell Jansson; Britt Redler; Lennart Truedsson; Anders Magnuson; Peter Matthiessen; Magnus Andersson; Lars Norgren
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional surgery.

Authors:  Celestino Pio Lombardi; Marco Raffaelli; Pietro Princi; Paola Lulli; Esther Diana Rossi; Guido Fadda; Rocco Bellantone
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.147

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Cosmesis and body image after minimally invasive or open thyroid surgery.

Authors:  Therezia Bokor; Erhard Kiffner; Bibiana Kotrikova; Franck Billmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed.

Authors:  P Miccoli; M Biricotti; V Matteucci; C E Ambrosini; J Wu; G Materazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Functional voice and swallowing outcomes after robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast approach: comparison with open thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Kyung Tae; Ki Yong Kim; Bo Ram Yun; Yong Bae Ji; Chul Won Park; Dong Sun Kim; Tae Wha Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Video-assisted endocrine neck surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Luca Sessa; Celestino Pio Lombardi; Carmela De Crea; Marco Raffaelli; Rocco Bellantone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-06-15

Review 5.  Morbidity from minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a general review.

Authors:  Celestino Pio Lombardi; Giulia Carnassale; Annamaria D'Amore; Valentina Milano; Carmela De Crea; Marco Raffaelli; Rocco Bellantone
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-10

6.  Long-term cosmetic results after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Maik Sahm; Beate Schwarz; Sybille Schmidt; Matthias Pross; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery using a collar access: experience in 246 cases with the CEViTS technique.

Authors:  Franz G Messenbaeck; Michael Weitzendorfer; Cornelia Kaminski; Kai Witzel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cosmetic result and overall satisfaction after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) versus robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT): a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Gabriele Materazzi; Lorenzo Fregoli; Gabriele Manzini; Angelo Baggiani; Mario Miccoli; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Hybrid techniques and patients' safety in implementing transoral sublingual thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Kai Witzel; Tahar Benhidjeb; Cornelia Kaminski; Franz G Messenbaeck; Michael Weitzendorfer
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 10.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional thyroidectomy (CT).

Authors:  Adolfo Pisanu; Mauro Podda; Isabella Reccia; Giulia Porceddu; Alessandro Uccheddu
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.