Literature DB >> 26335076

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed.

P Miccoli1, M Biricotti1, V Matteucci1, C E Ambrosini2, J Wu3, G Materazzi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive video-assisted approach was developed for primary hyperparathyroidism in 1997 and the year after for thyroid disease. Since then, the technique has been adopted worldwide, and indications moved from the initial benign disease to low-risk and intermediate-risk carcinoma, demonstrating a level of oncologic radicality comparable to the conventional open approach when inclusion criteria are strictly respected.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2014, 2412 minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomies (MIVAT) were performed in our department. The indication for surgery in 825 patients (34.3 %) was a malignant tumor, in particular, a papillary carcinoma in 800 patients. Among them, 528 patients operated on between 2000 and 2009 had a mean complete follow-up of 7.5 (standard deviation, 2.3) years.
RESULTS: A total thyroidectomy was performed in 1788 patients (74.1 %) and a hemithyroidectomy in 564 (23.4 %). Also performed was central compartment lymphadenectomy in 31 patients (1.3 %) and parathyroidectomy for the presence of a solitary parathyroid adenoma in 29 (1.2 %). Mean duration of the procedure was 41 (standard deviation, 14) minutes. After a mean follow-up of 7. 5 years, 528 patients who underwent MIVAT for low-risk or intermediate-risk papillary carcinoma presented a cure rate of 85 % (undetectable thyroglobulin), comparable with the 80 % rate reported in patients who had undergone open thyroidectomy during the same period.
CONCLUSIONS: After a long experience and a considerable number of procedures performed in a single center, MIVAT is confirmed as a safe operation, with a complication rate comparable with open thyroidectomy. MIVAT offers a cure rate for the treatment of low-risk and intermediate-risk malignancies that is comparable with an open procedure when inclusion criteria are strictly respected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT); Thyroid carcinoma; Thyroidectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26335076     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4503-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

1.  Video-assisted versus conventional total thyroidectomy and central compartment neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Celestino P Lombardi; Marco Raffaelli; Carmela De Crea; Luca Sessa; Valentina Rampulla; Rocco Bellantone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: the learning curve.

Authors:  P Del Rio; L Sommaruga; S Cataldo; G Robuschi; M F Arcuri; M Sianesi
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.745

3.  Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of benign thyroid tumor aiming at scarless surgery on the neck.

Authors:  K Shimizu; S Akira; S Tanaka
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Minimally invasive, video-assisted parathyroid surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  P Miccoli; A Pinchera; G Cecchini; M Conte; C Bendinelli; E Vignali; A Picone; C Marcocci
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: Learning curve in terms of mean operative time and conversion and complication rates.

Authors:  Yoann Pons; Benjamin Vérillaud; Jean-Philippe Blancal; Elisabeth Sauvaget; Tam Cloutier; Nicolas Le Clerc; Philippe Herman; Romain Kania
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Long-term cosmetic results after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Maik Sahm; Beate Schwarz; Sybille Schmidt; Matthias Pross; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Modifications of Miccoli minimally invasive thyroidectomy for the low-volume surgeon.

Authors:  David J Terris; Melanie W Seybt
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness.

Authors:  Paolo Miccoli; Rossella Elisei; Gabriele Materazzi; Marco Capezzone; David Galleri; Furio Pacini; Piero Berti; Aldo Pinchera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Istvan Gal; Tamas Solymosi; Zoltan Szabo; Alexander Balint; Gyorgy Bolgar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Minimally invasive video-assisted versus minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Zdeněk Fík; Jaromír Astl; Michal Zábrodský; Petr Lukeš; Ilja Merunka; Jan Betka; Martin Chovanec
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  9 in total

1.  Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Oncologic Outcome in Patients with Follow-Up ≥ 10 Years.

Authors:  Rocco Bellantone; Marco Raffaelli; Carmela De Crea; Luca Sessa; Emanuela Traini; Pietro Princi; Celestino Pio Lombardi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a critical analysis of long-term cosmetic results using a validated tool.

Authors:  M Sahm; R Otto; M Pross; R Mantke
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and transoral video-assisted thyroidectomy: A comparison of two systematic reviews.

Authors:  Francesco Tartaglia; Alessandro Giuliani; Salvatore Sorrenti; Salvatore Ulisse
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lisa H de Vries; Dilay Aykan; Lutske Lodewijk; Johanna A A Damen; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Menno R Vriens
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: a ten years experience.

Authors:  Paolo Del Rio; Lorenzo Viani; Chiara Montana Montana; Federico Cozzani; Mario Sianesi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-06

6.  Robot-Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy (RATT): A Series Appraisal of More than 250 Cases from Europe.

Authors:  Gabriele Materazzi; Lorenzo Fregoli; Piermarco Papini; Sohail Bakkar; Malince Chicas Vasquez; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Transoral thyroidectomy: a viable surgical option with unprecedented complications-a case series.

Authors:  S Bakkar; M Al Hyari; M Naghawi; C Corsini; P Miccoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT).

Authors:  Paolo Miccoli; Lorenzo Fregoli; Leonardo Rossi; Piermarco Papini; Carlo Enrico Ambrosini; Sohail Bakkar; Luigi De Napoli; Alexander Aghababyan; Valeria Matteucci; Gabriele Materazzi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-01

Review 9.  Recent Trends in Surgical Approach to Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo Rossi; Gabriele Materazzi; Sohail Bakkar; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.555

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.