Literature DB >> 20195212

C2 anatomy and dimensions relative to translaminar screw placement in an Asian population.

Xiang-Yang Ma1, Qing-Shui Yin, Zeng-Hui Wu, Hong Xia, K Daniel Riew, Jing-Fa Liu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cadaveric specimen study.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the applicability of a modified C2 translaminar screw placement in the general adult population and to provide pertinent clinical data for screw insertion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: C2 intralaminar screw fixation has recently been popularized, but this technique carries a potential drawback that the screw may breakout ventrally into the spinal canal. For this reason, a modified C2 translaminar screw fixation technique was developed to intraoperatively verify screw position and thereby decrease the risk or canal compromise. To our knowledge, there has been not an anatomic study evaluating this modification of the translaminar screw technique.
METHODS: The tips of the modified screws were aimed such that they exited the dorsal cortex of the center of the contralateral lateral mass, achieving bicortical fixation. A total of 120 adult C2 vertebrae were evaluated bilaterally for the following: thickness of the cranial, midportion, and caudal edge of C2 lamina; the heights of the spinous process, lamina, and lateral mass; inclination angle of the laminae, screw projection length, and trajectory angle of cranial and caudal C2 translaminar screw.
RESULTS: A total of 83.3% specimens had bilateral laminar thicknesses ≥4.0 mm and a spinous process height ≥9.0 mm; 5% had a laminar thickness less than 4.0-mm bilaterally; 9.2% had a laminar thickness less than 4.0 mm on one side; 2.5% had a spinous process height lower than 9.0 mm.
CONCLUSION: A large percentages of C2 laminae are of sufficient size to safely accommodate a bicortical 3.5-mm diameter screw. The thickness of the lamina and the height of the spinous process are the 2 limiting factors for safe translaminar screws placement. Using a bicortical technique confirms the position of the screw and thereby helps to decrease the risk of neurologic injury from screw penetration of the inner cortex of the lamina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20195212     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bb8831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Translaminar screw fixation of the cervical spine in Asian population: feasibility and safety consideration based on computerized tomographic measurements.

Authors:  Mohd Imran Yusof; Samir Shamsi Mohammed Shamsi
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Anatomical considerations of C2 lamina for the placement of translaminar screw: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Chytas; D S Korres; G C Babis; N E Efstathopoulos; E C Papadopoulos; K Markatos; V S Nikolaou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-08

3.  Use of C2 spinous process screw for posterior cervical fixation as substitute for laminar screw in a patient with thin laminae.

Authors:  Kosei Nagata; Satoshi Baba; Hirotaka Chikuda; Katsushi Takeshita
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-06-24

4.  Bone resorption during the first year after implantation of a single-segment dynamic interspinous stabilization device and its risk factors.

Authors:  Kaifeng Wang; Zhenqi Zhu; Bo Wang; Yi Zhu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Is polymethyl methacrylate a viable option for salvaging lateral mass screw failure in the subaxial cervical spine?

Authors:  Michael A Gallizzi; Craig A Kuhns; Tyler J Jenkins; Ferris M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-10-10

6.  Feasibility of translaminar screw placement in Korean population: morphometric analysis of cervical spine.

Authors:  Gyu Yeul Ji; Chang Hyun Oh; Sang Hyuk Park; Ferry Kurniawan; Junho Lee; Jae Kyun Jeon; Dong Ah Shin; Keung Nyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  C2 anatomy for translaminar screw placement based on computerized tomographic measurements.

Authors:  Kriangsak Saetia; Anuchit Phankhongsab
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

8.  Morphometric Analysis and Classification of the Cross-Sectional Shape of the C2 Lamina.

Authors:  Soyeon Kim; Dai-Soon Kwak; In-Beom Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Feasibility of bilateral crossing c7 intralaminar screws: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tae-Hyun Baek; Ilsup Kim; Jae-Taek Hong; Daniel H Kim; Dongsuk Shin; Sang-Won Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-07-31

10.  Morphometric and radiological assessments of dimensions of Axis in dry vertebrae: A study in Indian population.

Authors:  Raman Mohan Sharma; Nupur Pruthi; Paritosh Pandey; Rose Dawn; Yogitha Ravindranath; Roopa Ravindranath
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.