Literature DB >> 20194881

Effect of rosiglitazone on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the assessment on the prevention of progression by rosiglitazone on atherosclerosis in diabetes patients with cardiovascular history trial.

Hertzel C Gerstein1, Robert E Ratner, Christopher P Cannon, Patrick W Serruys, Héctor M García-García, Gerrit-Anne van Es, Nikheel S Kolatkar, Barbara G Kravitz, Diane M Miller, Chun Huang, Peter J Fitzgerald, Richard W Nesto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rosiglitazone has several properties that may affect progression of atherosclerosis. The Assessment on the Prevention of Progression by Rosiglitazone on Atherosclerosis in Diabetes Patients With Cardiovascular History (APPROACH) study was undertaken to determine the effect of the thiazolidinedione rosiglitazone on coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by intravascular ultrasound compared with the sulfonylurea glipizide. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled 18-month study in 672 patients aged 30 to 80 years with established type 2 diabetes mellitus treated by lifestyle, 1 oral agent, or submaximal doses of 2 oral agents who had at least 1 atherosclerotic plaque with 10% to 50% luminal narrowing in a coronary artery that had not undergone intervention during a clinically indicated coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was change in percent atheroma volume in the longest and least angulated epicardial coronary artery that had not undergone intervention. Secondary outcomes included change in normalized total atheroma volume and change in total atheroma volume in the most diseased baseline 10-mm segment. Rosiglitazone did not significantly reduce the primary outcome of percent atheroma volume compared with glipizide (-0.64%; 95% confidence interval, -1.46 to 0.17; P=0.12). The secondary outcome of normalized total atheroma volume was significantly reduced by rosiglitazone compared with glipizide (-5.1 mm(3); 95% confidence interval, -10.0 to -0.3; P=0.04); however, no significant difference between groups was observed for the change in total atheroma volume within the most diseased baseline 10-mm segment (-1.7 mm(3); 95% confidence interval, -3.9 to 0.5; P=0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Rosiglitazone did not significantly decrease the primary end point of progression of coronary atherosclerosis more than glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary atherosclerosis. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00116831.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20194881     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.881003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  26 in total

Review 1.  The role of intravascular ultrasound in the determination of progression and regression of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hideaki Kaneda; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Hiroshi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Strategies for optimizing glycemic control and cardiovascular prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  James H O'Keefe; Mohammad Abuannadi; Carl J Lavie; David S H Bell
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Diabetes: making sense of the rosiglitazone controversy.

Authors:  Michael E Farkouh; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Imaging plaques to predict and better manage patients with acute coronary events.

Authors:  Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Ik-Kyung Jang; Patrick W Serruys; Jason C Kovacic; Jagat Narula; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  PPAR-γ as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease: evidence and uncertainty.

Authors:  Janice V Huang; Clifford R Greyson; Gregory G Schwartz
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 6.  Platelet function profiles in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fabiana Rollini; Francesco Franchi; Ana Muñiz-Lozano; Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Effects of the PPARγ agonist pioglitazone on coronary atherosclerotic plaque composition and plaque progression in non-diabetic patients: a double-center, randomized controlled VH-IVUS pilot-trial.

Authors:  Marian Christoph; Joerg Herold; Anna Berg-Holldack; Thomas Rauwolf; Tjalf Ziemssen; Alexander Schmeisser; Sönke Weinert; Bernd Ebner; Samir Said; Ruth H Strasser; Ruediger C Braun-Dullaeus
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Thiazolidinediones: a 2010 perspective.

Authors:  Ashok Krishnaswami; Shalini Ravi-Kumar; John M Lewis
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2010

Review 9.  The prevention and regression of atherosclerotic plaques: emerging treatments.

Authors:  Atul Ashok Kalanuria; Paul Nyquist; Geoffrey Ling
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-09-25

Review 10.  Evaluating cardiovascular safety of novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Sidra Azim; William L Baker; William B White
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.