Literature DB >> 20193727

Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.

Jan W V van Dijken1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress has been considered as one of the main disadvantages of resin composite restorations. Cavities with high C-factors increase the risk for interfacial failures. Several restorative techniques have been suggested to decrease the shrinkage stress. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the durability of techniques as oblique layering, indirect curing and/or a laminate with a poly-acid modified resin composite in direct Class I resin composite restorations in a 12-year follow-up.
METHODS: Each of 29 patients received one or two pair(s) rather extensive Class I restorations. The first restoration was a poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite sandwich restoration and the second a direct resin composite restoration. Both restorations, except for the laminate layer, were placed with oblique layering and two-step curing technique. 90 restorations were evaluated annually with slightly modified USPHS criteria during 12 years.
RESULTS: At 12 years, 38 pairs were evaluated. Two cases of slight post-operative sensitivity were observed in one patient. A cumulative failure rate of 2.4% was observed for both the resin composite and the laminate restorations. One laminate restoration showed non-acceptable color match, but was not replaced and one resin composite restoration showed a chip fracture. Five restorations were replaced due to primary proximal caries.
CONCLUSIONS: The high failure rate expected in the high C-factor Class I cavity, associated with polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress, were not observed. The techniques used resulted in an excellent durability for the Class I resin composite restorations. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20193727     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  8 in total

1.  Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N J M Opdam; F H van de Sande; E Bronkhorst; M S Cenci; P Bottenberg; U Pallesen; P Gaengler; A Lindberg; M C D N J M Huysmans; J W van Dijken
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Effect of composite type and placement technique on cuspal strain.

Authors:  Vilhelm G Ólafsson; André V Ritter; Edward J Swift; Lee W Boushell; Ching-Chang Ko; Gabrielle R Jackson; Sumitha N Ahmed; Terence E Donovan
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.843

4.  The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.

Authors:  Nicola Scotti; Marco Scansetti; Riccardo Rota; Francesco Pera; Damiano Pasqualini; Elio Berutti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  A prospective 8-year follow-up of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth of children and adolescents in Public Dental Health Service: reasons for replacement.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Jan W V van Dijken; Jette Halken; Anna-Lena Hallonsten; Ruth Höigaard
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Can long-term dentine bonding created in real life be forecasted by parameters established in the laboratory?

Authors:  Heleine M C Rêgo; Thaís S Alves; Eduardo Bresciani; Li-Na Niu; Franklin R Tay; César R Pucci
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement lining and composite layering technique on the adhesive interface of lateral wall.

Authors:  Larissa Marinho Azevedo; Leslie Carol Casas-Apayco; Carlos Andres Villavicencio Espinoza; Linda Wang; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro; Maria Teresa Atta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.