Literature DB >> 20193714

National validation study of a swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.

Lisa R Hodges1, Laura J Rose, Heather O'Connell, Matthew J Arduino.   

Abstract

Twelve Laboratory Response Network (LRN) affiliated laboratories participated in a validation study of a macrofoam swab protocol for the recovery, detection, and quantification of viable B. anthracis (BA) Sterne spores from steel surfaces. CDC personnel inoculated steel coupons (26cm(2)) with 1-4 log(10) BA spores and recovered them by sampling with pre-moistened macrofoam swabs. Phase 1 (P1) of the study evaluated swabs containing BA only, while dust and background organisms were added to swabs in Phase 2 (P2) to mimic environmental conditions. Laboratories processed swabs and enumerated spores by culturing eluted swab suspensions and counting colonies with morphology consistent with BA. Processed swabs were placed in enrichment broth, incubated 24h, and cultured by streaking for isolation. Real-time PCR was performed on selected colonies from P2 samples to confirm the identity of BA. Mean percent recovery (%R) of spores from the surface ranged from 15.8 to 31.0% (P1) and from 27.9 to 55.0% (P2). The highest mean percent recovery was 31.0% (sd 10.9%) for P1 (4 log(10) inoculum) and 55.0% (sd 27.6%) for P2 (1 log(10) inoculum). The overall %R was higher for P2 (44.6%) than P1 (24.1%), but the overall reproducibility (between-lab variability) was lower in P2 than in P1 (25.0 vs 16.5%CV, respectively). The overall precision (within-lab variability) was close to identical for P1 and P2 (44.0 and 44.1, respectively), but varied greatly between inoculum levels. The protocol demonstrated linearity in %R over the three inoculum levels and is able to detect between 26 and 5x10(6)spores/26cm(2). Sensitivity as determined by culture was >98.3% for both phases and all inocula, suggesting that the culture method maintains sensitivity in the presence of contaminants. The enrichment broth method alone was less sensitive for sampled swabs (66.4%) during P2, suggesting that the presence of background organisms inhibited growth or isolation of BA from the broth. The addition of real-time PCR testing to the assay increased specificity from >85.4% to >95.0% in P2. Although the precision was low at the 1 log(10) inoculum level in both phases (59.0 and 50.2%), this swab processing protocol, was sensitive, specific, precise, and reproducible at 2-4 log(10)/26cm(2) spore concentrations. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20193714     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  17 in total

1.  Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Autumn S Downey; Sandra M Da Silva; Nathan D Olson; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of procedures for the collection, processing, and analysis of biomolecules from low-biomass surfaces.

Authors:  K Kwan; M Cooper; M T La Duc; P Vaishampayan; C Stam; J N Benardini; G Scalzi; C Moissl-Eichinger; K Venkateswaran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Rapid-viability PCR method for detection of live, virulent Bacillus anthracis in environmental samples.

Authors:  Sonia E Létant; Gloria A Murphy; Teneile M Alfaro; Julie R Avila; Staci R Kane; Ellen Raber; Thomas M Bunt; Sanjiv R Shah
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  False-negative rate and recovery efficiency performance of a validated sponge wipe sampling method.

Authors:  Paula A Krauter; Greg F Piepel; Raymond Boucher; Matt Tezak; Brett G Amidan; Wayne Einfeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.

Authors:  Laura J Rose; Lisa Hodges; Heather O'Connell; Judith Noble-Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Parameters affecting spore recovery from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Sandra M Da Silva; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of surface sampling methods for an extended duration outdoor biological contamination study.

Authors:  Anne M Mikelonis; Ahmed Abdel-Hady; Denise Aslett; Katherine Ratliff; Abderrahmane Touati; John Archer; Shannon Serre; Leroy Mickelsen; Sarah Taft; M W Calfee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Swab protocol for rapid laboratory diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax.

Authors:  Leslie A Dauphin; Chung K Marston; Vinod Bhullar; Daniel Baker; Mahmudur Rahman; M Jahangir Hossain; Apurba Chakraborty; Salah Uddin Khan; Alex R Hoffmaster
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Extraction of Aerosol-Deposited Yersinia pestis from Indoor Surfaces To Determine Bacterial Environmental Decay.

Authors:  Ian M Gut; Ryan A Bartlett; John J Yeager; Brian Leroux; Shanna Ratnesar-Shumate; Paul Dabisch; David K R Karaolis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Improved recovery of Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces with cotton swabs over foam, nylon, or polyester, and the role of hydrophilicity of cotton in governing the recovery efficiency.

Authors:  Pious Thomas; Mohammed M Mujawar; Reshmi Upreti; Aparna C Sekhar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.