OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of using a population-based informatics system for osteoporosis screening and treatment in women aged 65 years or older. DESIGN:A population-based informatics system (PRECARES: PREventive CAre REminder System) was implemented to meet the needs of the workflow of a primary care practice. Patients treated in either of two sections of a primary care internal medicine department were selected for the intervention, and patients of a comparable third section served as the control group. PRECARES identified women in the intervention group who were due for osteoporosis screening on the basis of age and who had no record of previous screening in our clinical system. If these eligible patients did not have an upcoming outpatient appointment, appointment secretaries sent a letter requesting that they call to make an appointment for a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan. MEASUREMENTS: At baseline and 3 months after the letters were sent, a database was used to determine the rate of osteoporosis screening in the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 689 patients in the intervention group were sent the letter. Three months after the letters were sent, the rate of osteoporosis screening was 76.4% (2409/3152) in the intervention group vs 69% (928/1344) in the control group (p<0.001). In the intervention group, 25% of the 689 patients responded to the letter and completed osteoporosis screening. Patients who had osteoporosis screening received appropriate treatment. CONCLUSION: A population-based informatics system for primary care practice significantly improved the rate of osteoporosis screening.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of using a population-based informatics system for osteoporosis screening and treatment in women aged 65 years or older. DESIGN: A population-based informatics system (PRECARES: PREventive CAre REminder System) was implemented to meet the needs of the workflow of a primary care practice. Patients treated in either of two sections of a primary care internal medicine department were selected for the intervention, and patients of a comparable third section served as the control group. PRECARES identified women in the intervention group who were due for osteoporosis screening on the basis of age and who had no record of previous screening in our clinical system. If these eligible patients did not have an upcoming outpatient appointment, appointment secretaries sent a letter requesting that they call to make an appointment for a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan. MEASUREMENTS: At baseline and 3 months after the letters were sent, a database was used to determine the rate of osteoporosis screening in the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 689 patients in the intervention group were sent the letter. Three months after the letters were sent, the rate of osteoporosis screening was 76.4% (2409/3152) in the intervention group vs 69% (928/1344) in the control group (p<0.001). In the intervention group, 25% of the 689 patients responded to the letter and completed osteoporosis screening. Patients who had osteoporosis screening received appropriate treatment. CONCLUSION: A population-based informatics system for primary care practice significantly improved the rate of osteoporosis screening.
Authors: Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Dorothy Y Hung; Thomas G Rundall; Benjamin F Crabtree; Alfred F Tallia; Deborah J Cohen; Helen A Halpin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Teresa A Hillier; Katie L Stone; Doug C Bauer; Joanne H Rizzo; Kathryn L Pedula; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc C Hochberg; Steve R Cummings Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-01-22
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Rajeev Chaudhry; Sidna M Scheitel; Erin K McMurtry; Dorinda J Leutink; Rosa L Cabanela; James M Naessens; Ahmed S Rahman; Lynn A Davis; Robert J Stroebel Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-03-26
Authors: Adrian H Zai; Seokjin Kim; Arnold Kamis; Ken Hung; Jeremiah G Ronquillo; Henry C Chueh; Steven J Atlas Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ramona S DeJesus; Kurt B Angstman; Rebecca Kesman; Robert J Stroebel; Matthew E Bernard; Sidna M Scheitel; Vicki L Hunt; Ahmed S Rahman; Rajeev Chaudhry Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Paul Y Takahashi; Euijung Ryu; Janet E Olson; Erin M Winkler; Matthew A Hathcock; Ruchi Gupta; Jeff A Sloan; Jyotishman Pathak; Suzette J Bielinski; James R Cerhan Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2015-08-11
Authors: Frederick North; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; John C Matulis; Jennifer L Pecina; Andrew M Franqueira; Sarah S Johnson; Rajeev Chaudhry Journal: SAGE Open Med Date: 2018-09-17