Literature DB >> 20190057

The inadvertent disclosure of personal health information through peer-to-peer file sharing programs.

Khaled El Emam1, Emilio Neri, Elizabeth Jonker, Marina Sokolova, Liam Peyton, Angelica Neisa, Teresa Scassa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There has been a consistent concern about the inadvertent disclosure of personal information through peer-to-peer file sharing applications, such as Limewire and Morpheus. Examples of personal health and financial information being exposed have been published. We wanted to estimate the extent to which personal health information (PHI) is being disclosed in this way, and compare that to the extent of disclosure of personal financial information (PFI).
DESIGN: After careful review and approval of our protocol by our institutional research ethics board, files were downloaded from peer-to-peer file sharing networks and manually analyzed for the presence of PHI and PFI. The geographic region of the IP addresses was determined, and classified as either USA or Canada. MEASUREMENT: We estimated the proportion of files that contain personal health and financial information for each region. We also estimated the proportion of search terms that return files with personal health and financial information. We ascertained and discuss the ethical issues related to this study.
RESULTS: Approximately 0.4% of Canadian IP addresses had PHI, as did 0.5% of US IP addresses. There was more disclosure of financial information, at 1.7% of Canadian IP addresses and 4.7% of US IP addresses. An analysis of search terms used in these file sharing networks showed that a small percentage of the terms would return PHI and PFI files (ie, there are people successfully searching for PFI and PHI on the peer-to-peer file sharing networks).
CONCLUSION: There is a real risk of inadvertent disclosure of PHI through peer-to-peer file sharing networks, although the risk is not as large as for PFI. Anyone keeping PHI on their computers should avoid installing file sharing applications on their computers, or if they have to use such tools, actively manage the risks of inadvertent disclosure of their, their family's, their clients', or patients' PHI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190057      PMCID: PMC3000774          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  17 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities.

Authors:  G Eysenbach; J E Till
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-10

2.  Pornography in Usenet: a study of 9,800 randomly selected images.

Authors:  M D Mehta
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2001-12

3.  Unsolicited narratives from the Internet: a rich source of qualitative data.

Authors:  K M Robinson
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2001-09

4.  Current state of information technology use in a US primary care practice-based research network.

Authors:  James E Andrews; Kevin A Pearce; Carey Sydney; Carol Ireson; Margaret Love
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2004

5.  Psychological research online: report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet.

Authors:  Robert Kraut; Judith Olson; Mahzarin Banaji; Amy Bruckman; Jeffrey Cohen; Mick Couper
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2004 Feb-Mar

Review 6.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Chris C Wright
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

7.  What is special about the ethical issues in online research?

Authors:  Dag Elgesem
Journal:  Ethics Inf Technol       Date:  2002

8.  How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Timothy G Ferris; Karen Donelan; Catherine DesRoches; Alexandra Shields; Sara Rosenbaum; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; Peter Shin; Michael G Leu; Douglas E Levy; Renée Marie Betancourt; Dan Hawkins; Michelle Proser
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 10.  Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Susan Mora; Jon F Merz; Nora L Jones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  5 in total

1.  P2P watch: personal health information detection in peer-to-peer file-sharing networks.

Authors:  Marina Sokolova; Khaled El Emam; Luk Arbuckle; Emilio Neri; Sean Rose; Elizabeth Jonker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Patient Health Record Systems Scope and Functionalities: Literature Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lina Bouayad; Anna Ialynytchev; Balaji Padmanabhan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Clinicians' Concerns About Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools Designed for Emerging Psychiatric Problems: Prospective Acceptability Assessment of the MEmind App.

Authors:  Christophe Lemey; Mark Erik Larsen; Jordan Devylder; Philippe Courtet; Romain Billot; Philippe Lenca; Michel Walter; Enrique Baca-García; Sofian Berrouiguet
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Recent trends in biomedical informatics: a study based on JAMIA articles.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Jiang; Krystal Tse; Shuang Wang; Son Doan; Hyeoneui Kim; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.