Literature DB >> 20190010

Odor detection by humans of lineal aliphatic aldehydes and helional as gauged by dose-response functions.

J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz1, Michael H Abraham.   

Abstract

We have measured concentration detection (i.e., psychometric) functions to determine the odor detectability of homologous aliphatic aldehydes (propanal, butanal, hexanal, octanal, and nonanal) and helional. Subjects (16 < or = n < or = 18) used a 3-alternative forced-choice procedure against carbon-filtered air (blanks), under an ascending concentration approach. Generation, delivery, and control of each vapor were achieved via an 8-station vapor delivery device. Gas chromatography served to quantify the concentrations presented. Group and individual functions were modeled by a sigmoid (logistic) equation. Odor detection thresholds (ODTs) were defined as the concentration producing a detectability (P) halfway (P = 0.5) between chance (P = 0.0) and perfect detection (P = 1.0). ODTs decreased with carbon chain length: 2.0, 0.46, 0.33, and 0.17 ppb, respectively, from propanal to octanal, but the threshold increased for nonanal (0.53 ppb), revealing maximum sensitivity for the 8-carbon member. The strong olfactory receptor (OR) ligands octanal and helional (0.14 ppb) showed the lowest thresholds. ODTs fell at the lower end of previously reported values. Interindividual variability (ODT ratios) amounted to a factor ranging from 10 to 50, lower than typically reported, and was highest for octanal and hexanal. The behavioral dose-response functions emerge at concentrations 2-5 orders of magnitude lower than those required for functions tracing the activation of specific human ORs by the same aldehydes in cell/molecular studies, after all functions were expressed as vapor concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20190010      PMCID: PMC2912639          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjq018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  55 in total

1.  A model for odour thresholds.

Authors:  Michael H Abraham; Joëlle M R Gola; J Enrique Cometto-Muniz; William S Cain
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Quantification of chemical vapors in chemosensory research.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William S Cain; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Predicted 3-D structures for mouse I7 and rat I7 olfactory receptors and comparison of predicted odor recognition profiles with experiment.

Authors:  Spencer E Hall; Wely B Floriano; Nagarajan Vaidehi; William A Goddard
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 4.  A code in the nose.

Authors:  Stuart Firestein
Journal:  Sci STKE       Date:  2004-03-30

5.  An imaging-based approach to identify ligands for olfactory receptors.

Authors:  Adi Mizrahi; Hiroaki Matsunami; Lawrence C Katz
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Dual capacity of a human olfactory receptor.

Authors:  Marc Spehr; Katlen Schwane; Stefan Heilmann; Günter Gisselmann; Thomas Hummel; Hanns Hatt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Specificity of odorant-binding proteins: a factor influencing the sensitivity of olfactory receptor-based biosensors.

Authors:  Hwi Jin Ko; Sang Hun Lee; Eun Hae Oh; Tai Hyun Park
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Testing olfaction in a clinical setting.

Authors:  W S Cain
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.697

9.  Analysis of the molecular basis for octanal interactions in the expressed rat 17 olfactory receptor.

Authors:  M S Singer
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  A pharmacological profile of the aldehyde receptor repertoire in rat olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Ricardo C Araneda; Zita Peterlin; Xinmin Zhang; Alex Chesler; Stuart Firestein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  7 in total

1.  An algorithm for 353 odor detection thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael H Abraham; Ricardo Sánchez-Moreno; J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William S Cain
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Sniff-synchronized, gradient-guided olfactory search by freely moving mice.

Authors:  Teresa M Findley; David G Wyrick; Jennifer L Cramer; Morgan A Brown; Blake Holcomb; Robin Attey; Dorian Yeh; Eric Monasevitch; Nelly Nouboussi; Isabelle Cullen; Jeremea O Songco; Jared F King; Yashar Ahmadian; Matthew C Smear
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Spontaneously active NaV1.5 sodium channels may underlie odor sensitivity.

Authors:  Vincent E Dionne
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Structure-activity relationships on the odor detectability of homologous carboxylic acids by humans.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hydrogen bonding between solutes in solvents octan-1-ol and water.

Authors:  Michael H Abraham; Joelle M R Gola; J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William E Acree
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.354

6.  Ethanolic Fermentation of Rye Mashes: Factors Influencing the Formation of Aldehydes and Process Efficiency.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska; Maria Balcerek; Maciej Klebeko; Urszula Dziekońska-Kubczak; Mariusz Hebdzyński
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-08-06

7.  Computational Approaches for Decoding Select Odorant-Olfactory Receptor Interactions Using Mini-Virtual Screening.

Authors:  K Harini; Ramanathan Sowdhamini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.