Literature DB >> 20189980

Fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine: a viable first-line treatment option for advanced pancreatic and biliary tract cancer.

Michele Milella1, Alain J Gelibter, Maria Simona Pino, Giandominik Bossone, Paolo Marolla, Isabella Sperduti, Francesco Cognetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have already reported on fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine (FDR-Gem) in advanced, inoperable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the context of a formal phase II study; building on that experience, we have now expanded the study to reach a cumulative accrual of 106 patients.
METHODS: One hundred six patients (PDAC/BTC, 75/31) were treated with weekly FDR-Gem (1,000 mg/m(2) infused at 10 mg/m(2) per minute). Patient characteristics included: male-to-female ratio, 0.83; median age, 63 years (range, 28-82); metastatic disease in 66% of patients; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 0-1 in 81% of patients.
RESULTS: The median and total number of treatment weeks delivered were 8 (range, 2-22) and 1,154, respectively. Thirteen percent of patients achieved an objective response, 42% experienced a positive clinical benefit response, and 54% achieved a >50% reduction in serum cancer antigen (CA)19.9 levels. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times for the entire population were 4.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-5.1 months) and 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.3-8.8 months), respectively, with 20% of patients alive at 1 year. On multivariate analysis, a CA19.9 reduction >50% and baseline ECOG PS score of 0 were the only independent predictors of PFS and OS, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 47 of 1,154 treatment weeks (4.1%), and grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia in 8 of 1,154 (0.7%) and 16 of 1,154 (1.4%) treatment weeks, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence, including this updated analysis, supports the use of FDR-Gem as a first-line option in advanced PDAC, and possibly in BTC, patients and prompts the continued evaluation of this approach in combination regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20189980      PMCID: PMC3227937          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  7 in total

Review 1.  Single-agent gemcitabine for biliary tract cancers. Study outcomes and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Takayoshi Kiba; Tsutomu Nishimura; Shigemi Matsumoto; Etsuro Hatano; Akira Mori; Shujiro Yasumi; Ryuichiro Doi; Iwao Ikai; Toshiyuki Kitano; Takafumi Nishimura; Kiyotsugu Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Kazuhiro Yanagihara; Emiko Doi; Satoshi Teramukai; Masanori Fukushima
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  H A Burris; M J Moore; J Andersen; M R Green; M L Rothenberg; M R Modiano; M C Cripps; R K Portenoy; A M Storniolo; P Tarassoff; R Nelson; F A Dorr; C D Stephens; D D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  An investigational new drug treatment program for patients with gemcitabine: results for over 3000 patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A M Storniolo; N H Enas; C A Brown; M Voi; M L Rothenberg; R Schilsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Fixed dose-rate gemcitabine infusion as first-line treatment for advanced-stage carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tree.

Authors:  Alain Gelibter; Paola Malaguti; Serena Di Cosimo; Emilio Bria; Enzo Maria Ruggeri; Paolo Carlini; Fabio Carboni; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Mario Pellicciotta; Diana Giannarelli; Edmondo Terzoli; Francesco Cognetti; Michele Milella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret Tempero; William Plunkett; Veronique Ruiz Van Haperen; John Hainsworth; Howard Hochster; Renato Lenzi; James Abbruzzese
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Prolonged versus standard gemcitabine infusion: translation of molecular pharmacology to new treatment strategy.

Authors:  Stephan A Veltkamp; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-03

Review 7.  New therapeutic directions for advanced pancreatic cancer: targeting the epidermal growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways.

Authors:  Howard Burris; Caio Rocha-Lima
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-03
  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Developments in metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the standard?

Authors:  Jie-Er Ying; Li-Ming Zhu; Bi-Xia Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Metastatic pancreatic cancer: Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Vanja Vaccaro; Isabella Sperduti; Sabrina Vari; Emilio Bria; Davide Melisi; Carlo Garufi; Carmen Nuzzo; Aldo Scarpa; Giampaolo Tortora; Francesco Cognetti; Michele Reni; Michele Milella
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  First-line erlotinib and fixed dose-rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Vanja Vaccaro; Emilio Bria; Isabella Sperduti; Alain Gelibter; Luca Moscetti; Giovanni Mansueto; Enzo Maria Ruggeri; Teresa Gamucci; Francesco Cognetti; Michele Milella
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.