Literature DB >> 20189576

Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions.

Desmond Y R Chong1, Ulrich N Hansen, Andrew A Amis.   

Abstract

A lack of initial stability of the fixation is associated with aseptic loosening of the tibial components of cementless knee prostheses. With sufficient stability after surgery, minimal relative motion between the prosthesis and bone interfaces allows osseointegation to occur thereby providing a strong prosthesis-to-bone biological attachment. Finite element modelling was used to investigate the bone-prosthesis interface micromotion and the relative risk of aseptic loosening. It was anticipated that by prescribing different joint loads representing gait and other activities, and the consideration of varying tibial-femoral contact points during knee flexion, it would influence the computational prediction of the interface micromotion. In this study, three-dimensional finite element models were set up with applied loads representing walking and stair climbing, and the relative micromotions were predicted. These results were correlated to in-vitro measurements and to the results of prior retrieval studies. Two load conditions, (i) a generic vertical joint load of 3 x body weight with 70%/30%M/L load share and antero-posterior/medial-lateral shear forces, acted at the centres of the medial and lateral compartments of the tibial tray, and (ii) a peak vertical joint load at 25% of the stair climbing cycle with corresponding antero-posterior shear force applied at the tibial-femoral contact points of the specific knee flexion angle, were found to generate interface micromotion responses which corresponded to in-vivo observations. The study also found that different loads altered the interface micromotion predicted, so caution is needed when comparing the fixation performance of various reported cementless tibial prosthetic designs if each design was evaluated with a different loading condition. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20189576     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Analysis of different bicruciate-retaining tibial prosthesis design using a three dimension finite element model.

Authors:  Peiheng He; Xing Li; Shuai Huang; Minghao Liu; Weizhi Chen; Dongliang Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Emerging ideas: Instability-induced periprosthetic osteolysis is not dependent on the fibrous tissue interface.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Mathias P G Bostrom; Anna Fahlgren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison between uncemented and cemented fixation for the tibial component in distal femoral replacement: a clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  Haijie Liang; Wei Guo; Rongli Yang; Xiaodong Tang; Taiqiang Yan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Intermittent Parathyroid Hormone Enhances Cancellous Osseointegration of a Novel Murine Tibial Implant.

Authors:  Xu Yang; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Aleksey Dvorzhinskiy; Caroline Brial; Zachary Lane; Samrath Bhimani; Jayme C Burket; Bin Hu; Alexander M Sarkisian; F Patrick Ross; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Mechanical micromodeling of stress-shielding at the bone-implant interphase under shear loading.

Authors:  Yoann Hériveaux; Sophie Le Cann; Manon Fraulob; Elsa Vennat; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  Different femorotibial contact on the weight-bearing: midflexion between normal and varus aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eisaku Fujimoto; Yoshiaki Sasashige; Tetsuya Tomita; Kenji Kashiwagi; Amiko Inoue; Mikiya Sawa; Yuki Ota
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Vascular endothelial growth factor pathway promotes osseointegration and CD31hiEMCNhi endothelium expansion in a mouse tibial implant model: an animal study.

Authors:  G Ji; R Xu; Y Niu; N Li; L Ivashkiv; M P G Bostrom; M B Greenblatt; X Yang
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part II: Influence of loading and fixation design on tibial bone-implant interaction.

Authors:  Fernando J Quevedo González; Brett D Steineman; Daniel R Sturnick; Jonathan T Deland; Constantine A Demetracopoulos; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Gut microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids and bone: a potential role in fracture healing.

Authors:  A Wallimann; W Magrath; K Thompson; T Moriarty; R G Richards; C A Akdis; L O'Mahony; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.