Literature DB >> 20189348

A novel model for examining recovery of phonation after vocal nerve damage.

Prabhat K Bhama1, Allen D Hillel, Albert L Merati, David J Perkel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury remains a dominant clinical issue in laryngology. To date, no animal model of laryngeal reinnervation has offered an outcome measure that can reflect the degree of recovery based on vocal function. We present an avian model system for studying recovery of learned vocalizations after nerve injury. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective animal study.
METHODS: Digital recordings of bird song were made from 11 adult male zebra finches; nine birds underwent bilateral crushing of the nerve supplying the vocal organ, and two birds underwent sham surgery. Songs from all the birds were then recorded regularly and analyzed based on temporal and spectral characteristics using computer software. Indices were calculated to indicate the degree of similarity between preoperative and postoperative song.
RESULTS: Nerve crush caused audible differences in song quality and significant drops (P<0.05) in measured spectral and, to a lesser degree, temporal indices. Spectral indices recovered significantly (mean=43.0%; standard deviation [SD]=40.7; P<0.02), and there was an insignificant trend toward recovery of temporal index (mean=28.0%; SD=41.4; P=0.0771). In five of the nine (56%) birds, there was a greater than 50% recovery of spectral indices within a 4-week period. Two birds exhibited substantially less recovery of spectral indices and two birds had a persistent decline in spectral indices. Recovery of temporal index was highly variable as well, ranging from persistent further declines of 45.1% to recovery of 87%. Neither sham bird exhibited significant (P>0.05) differences in song after nerve crush.
CONCLUSION: The songbird model system allows functional analysis of learned vocalization after surgical damage to vocal nerves.
Copyright © 2011 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20189348      PMCID: PMC2908731          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  28 in total

Review 1.  Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour.

Authors:  M S Brainard; A J Doupe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Postlearning consolidation of birdsong: stabilizing effects of age and anterior forebrain lesions.

Authors:  M S Brainard; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Behaviourally driven gene expression reveals song nuclei in hummingbird brain.

Authors:  E D Jarvis; S Ribeiro; M L da Silva; D Ventura; J Vielliard; C V Mello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches.

Authors:  K W Nordeen; E J Nordeen
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1992-01

Review 5.  Birdbrains could teach basal ganglia research a new song.

Authors:  Allison J Doupe; David J Perkel; Anton Reiner; Edward A Stern
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  A new mechanism of sound generation in songbirds.

Authors:  F Goller; O N Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Experimental studies on the reinnervation of larynx after accurate neurorrhaphy.

Authors:  T Tashiro
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Regeneration of the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Authors:  R L Crumley; B F McCabe
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 9.  Neural pathways for the control of birdsong production.

Authors:  J M Wild
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1997-11

10.  Nimodipine improves reinnervation and neuromuscular function after injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the rat.

Authors:  Jonas Hydman; Sten Remahl; Gunnar Björck; Mikael Svensson; Per Mattsson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.