Literature DB >> 20188372

Numerical and experimental investigations of pulsatile blood flow pattern through a dysfunctional mechanical heart valve.

O Smadi1, I Hassan, P Pibarot, L Kadem.   

Abstract

Around 250,000 heart valve replacements are performed every year around the world. Due their higher durability, approximately 2/3 of these replacements use mechanical prosthetic heart valves (mainly bileaflet valves). Although very efficient, these valves can be subject to valve leaflet malfunctions. These malfunctions are usually the consequence of pannus ingrowth and/or thrombus formation and represent serious and potentially fatal complications. Hence, it is important to investigate the flow field downstream of a dysfunctional mechanical heart valve to better understand its impact on blood components (red blood cells, platelets and coagulation factors) and to improve the current diagnosis techniques. Therefore, the objective of this study will be to numerically and experimentally investigate the pulsatile turbulent flow downstream of a dysfunctional bileaflet mechanical heart valve in terms of velocity field, vortex formation and potential negative effect on blood components. The results show that the flow downstream of a dysfunctional valve was characterized by abnormally elevated velocities and shear stresses as well as large scale vortices. These characteristics can predispose to blood components damage. Furthermore, valve malfunction led to an underestimation of maximal transvalvular pressure gradient, using Doppler echocardiography, when compared to numerical results. This could be explained by the shifting of the maximal velocity towards the normally functioning leaflet. As a consequence, clinicians should try, when possible, to check the maximal velocity position not only at the central orifice but also through the lateral orifices. Finding the maximal velocity in the lateral orifice could be an indication of valve dysfunction. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20188372     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

Review 1.  Simulation of Mechanical Heart Valve Dysfunction and the Non-Newtonian Blood Model Approach.

Authors:  Aolin Chen; Adi Azriff Bin Basri; Norzian Bin Ismail; Masaaki Tamagawa; Di Zhu; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Lagrangian postprocessing of computational hemodynamics.

Authors:  Shawn C Shadden; Amirhossein Arzani
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Purely phase-encoded MRI of turbulent flow through a dysfunctional bileaflet mechanical heart valve.

Authors:  Olusegun Adegbite; Lyes Kadem; Benedict Newling
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Numerical Modeling of Intraventricular Flow during Diastole after Implantation of BMHV.

Authors:  Boyang Su; Foad Kabinejadian; Hui Qun Phang; Gideon Praveen Kumar; Fangsen Cui; Sangho Kim; Ru San Tan; Jimmy Kim Fatt Hon; John Carson Allen; Hwa Liang Leo; Liang Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Integrated strategy for in vitro characterization of a bileaflet mechanical aortic valve.

Authors:  Francesca Maria Susin; Stefania Espa; Riccardo Toninato; Stefania Fortini; Giorgio Querzoli
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Adverse Hemodynamic Conditions Associated with Mechanical Heart Valve Leaflet Immobility.

Authors:  Fardin Khalili; Peshala P T Gamage; Richard H Sandler; Hansen A Mansy
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-16

7.  Effects of pannus formation on the flow around a bileaflet mechanical heart valve.

Authors:  Woojin Kim; Haecheon Choi; Jihoon Kweon; Dong Hyun Yang; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.