Literature DB >> 20186347

Allele interaction--single locus genetics meets regulatory biology.

Arne B Gjuvsland1, Erik Plahte, Tormod Adnøy, Stig W Omholt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the dawn of genetics, additive and dominant gene action in diploids have been defined by comparison of heterozygote and homozygote phenotypes. However, these definitions provide little insight into the underlying intralocus allelic functional dependency and thus cannot serve directly as a mediator between genetics theory and regulatory biology, a link that is sorely needed. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We provide such a link by distinguishing between positive, negative and zero allele interaction at the genotype level. First, these distinctions disclose that a biallelic locus can display 18 qualitatively different allele interaction sign motifs (triplets of +, - and 0). Second, we show that for a single locus, Mendelian dominance is not related to heterozygote allele interaction alone, but is actually a function of the degrees of allele interaction in all the three genotypes. Third, we demonstrate how the allele interaction in each genotype is directly quantifiable in gene regulatory models, and that there is a unique, one-to-one correspondence between the sign of autoregulatory feedback loops and the sign of the allele interactions. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The concept of allele interaction refines single locus genetics substantially, and it provides a direct link between classical models of gene action and gene regulatory biology. Together with available empirical data, our results indicate that allele interaction can be exploited experimentally to identify and explain intricate intra- and inter-locus feedback relationships in eukaryotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186347      PMCID: PMC2826424          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  47 in total

1.  Modeling genetic architecture: a multilinear theory of gene interaction.

Authors:  T F Hansen; G P Wagner
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Increased efficiency of mRNA 3' end formation: a new genetic mechanism contributing to hereditary thrombophilia.

Authors:  N H Gehring; U Frede; G Neu-Yilik; P Hundsdoerfer; B Vetter; M W Hentze; A E Kulozik
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Transvection effects in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ian W Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 4.  Gene networks: how to put the function in genomics.

Authors:  Paul Brazhnik; Alberto de la Fuente; Pedro Mendes
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.536

5.  Direct autoregulation and gene dosage compensation by POU-domain transcription factor Brn3a.

Authors:  May Trieu; Ann Ma; S Raisa Eng; Natalia Fedtsova; Eric E Turner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Functional analysis of human promoter polymorphisms.

Authors:  Bastiaan Hoogendoorn; Sharon L Coleman; Carol A Guy; Kaye Smith; Tim Bowen; Paul R Buckland; Michael C O'Donovan
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Abundant raw material for cis-regulatory evolution in humans.

Authors:  Matthew V Rockman; Gregory A Wray
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Allelic variations in gene expression.

Authors:  Hai Yan; Wei Zhou
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.645

9.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  Guri Giaever; Angela M Chu; Li Ni; Carla Connelly; Linda Riles; Steeve Véronneau; Sally Dow; Ankuta Lucau-Danila; Keith Anderson; Bruno André; Adam P Arkin; Anna Astromoff; Mohamed El-Bakkoury; Rhonda Bangham; Rocio Benito; Sophie Brachat; Stefano Campanaro; Matt Curtiss; Karen Davis; Adam Deutschbauer; Karl-Dieter Entian; Patrick Flaherty; Francoise Foury; David J Garfinkel; Mark Gerstein; Deanna Gotte; Ulrich Güldener; Johannes H Hegemann; Svenja Hempel; Zelek Herman; Daniel F Jaramillo; Diane E Kelly; Steven L Kelly; Peter Kötter; Darlene LaBonte; David C Lamb; Ning Lan; Hong Liang; Hong Liao; Lucy Liu; Chuanyun Luo; Marc Lussier; Rong Mao; Patrice Menard; Siew Loon Ooi; Jose L Revuelta; Christopher J Roberts; Matthias Rose; Petra Ross-Macdonald; Bart Scherens; Greg Schimmack; Brenda Shafer; Daniel D Shoemaker; Sharon Sookhai-Mahadeo; Reginald K Storms; Jeffrey N Strathern; Giorgio Valle; Marleen Voet; Guido Volckaert; Ching-yun Wang; Teresa R Ward; Julie Wilhelmy; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Yonghong Yang; Grace Yen; Elaine Youngman; Kexin Yu; Howard Bussey; Jef D Boeke; Michael Snyder; Peter Philippsen; Ronald W Davis; Mark Johnston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mammalian mutation pressure, synonymous codon choice, and mRNA degradation.

Authors:  Jubao Duan; Marcos A Antezana
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Phenomics: the next challenge.

Authors:  David Houle; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Stig Omholt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Propagation of genetic variation in gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Erik Plahte; Arne B Gjuvsland; Stig W Omholt
Journal:  Physica D       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Post-GWAS: where next? More samples, more SNPs or more biology?

Authors:  P Marjoram; A Zubair; S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Genetic architecture of regulatory variation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Andrew J Cal; Justin O Borevitz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Genotype-Phenotype Map Characteristics of an In silico Heart Cell.

Authors:  Jon Olav Vik; Arne B Gjuvsland; Liren Li; Kristin Tøndel; Steven Niederer; Nicolas P Smith; Peter J Hunter; Stig W Omholt
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Association genetics in Populus reveals the interactions between Pt-miR397a and its target genes.

Authors:  Jinhui Chen; Beibei Chen; Xiaohui Yang; Jiaxing Tian; Qingzhang Du; Deqiang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Bridging the genotype-phenotype gap: what does it take?

Authors:  Arne B Gjuvsland; Jon Olav Vik; Daniel A Beard; Peter J Hunter; Stig W Omholt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Widespread non-additive and interaction effects within HLA loci modulate the risk of autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Tobias L Lenz; Aaron J Deutsch; Buhm Han; Xinli Hu; Yukinori Okada; Stephen Eyre; Michael Knapp; Alexandra Zhernakova; Tom W J Huizinga; Gonçalo Abecasis; Jessica Becker; Guy E Boeckxstaens; Wei-Min Chen; Andre Franke; Dafna D Gladman; Ines Gockel; Javier Gutierrez-Achury; Javier Martin; Rajan P Nair; Markus M Nöthen; Suna Onengut-Gumuscu; Proton Rahman; Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Philip E Stuart; Lam C Tsoi; David A van Heel; Jane Worthington; Mira M Wouters; Lars Klareskog; James T Elder; Peter K Gregersen; Johannes Schumacher; Stephen S Rich; Cisca Wijmenga; Shamil R Sunyaev; Paul I W de Bakker; Soumya Raychaudhuri
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A classical genetic solution to enhance the biosynthesis of anticancer phytochemicals in Andrographis paniculata Nees.

Authors:  Alireza Valdiani; Daryush Talei; Soon Guan Tan; Mihdzar Abdul Kadir; Mahmood Maziah; Mohd Yusop Rafii; Sreenivasa Rao Sagineedu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trans-allelic mutational effects at the Peg3 imprinted locus.

Authors:  Corey L Bretz; Joomyeong Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.