Literature DB >> 20186092

Evaluation of the Shore A hardness of silicone for facial prosthesis as to the effect of storage period and chemical disinfection.

Aimée Maria Guiotti1, Marcelo Coelho Goiato, Daniela Micheline dos Santos.   

Abstract

The failure of facial prostheses is caused by limitations in the properties of existing materials, especially flexibility and durability. Therefore, this study evaluated the Shore A hardness of silicone used for fabrication of facial prostheses, Silastic MDX4-4210, according to the influence of storage period, daily disinfection, and 2 types of pigmentation. Thirty specimens were fabricated and divided in 3 groups: colorless, pigmented with makeup, and pigmented with iron oxide. Analysis of results was assessed on a Shore A hardness meter immediately, 6 months, and 1 year after fabrication of specimens, following the guidelines of the American Society for Testing and Materials. The hardness values were statistically analyzed by the Tukey test. The silicone exhibited an increase in hardness with time. However, the hardness was stable from 6 months to 1 year. It was concluded that the silicone is within the values of Shore A hardness reported in the literature, regardless of the storage period, pigmentation, and chemical disinfection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186092     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fa4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  7 in total

1.  Influence of Different Pigmentations and Accelerated Aging on the Hardness and Tear Strength of the A-2186 and MDX4-4210 Silicones.

Authors:  Estefânia Marrega Malavazi; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto; Fernanda Pereira de Caxias; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Lisiane Cristina Bannwart; Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira; André Luiz de Melo Moreno; André Pinheiro de Magalhães Bertoz; Marcelo Coelho Goiato
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-08-20

2.  Evaluation of Shore A hardness of maxillofacial silicones: the effect of dark storage and nanoparticles.

Authors:  Pınar Çevik
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2018-05-01

3.  Effect of different disinfecting procedures on the hardness and color stability of two maxillofacial elastomers over time.

Authors:  Panagiota N Eleni; Magdalini K Krokida; Gregory L Polyzois; Lawrence Gettleman
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Effect of surface treated silicon dioxide nanoparticles on some mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer.

Authors:  Sara M Zayed; Ahmad M Alshimy; Amal E Fahmy
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2014-12-09

5.  Tear Strength Analysis of MDX4-4210 and A-2186 Silicones with Different Intrinsic Pigments Incorporated by Mechanical and Industrial Methods.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Adhara Smith Nobrega; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; André Pinheiro de Magalhães Bertoz; Mariana Vilela Sonego; Clovis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-12-21

6.  The effect of different storage conditions on the physical properties of pigmented medical grade I silicone maxillofacial material.

Authors:  Ayman A Al-Dharrab; Seham B Tayel; Mona H Abodaya
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2013-03-28

7.  Evaluation of some mechanical properties of a new silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses after addition of intrinsic pigments.

Authors:  Hussein A Abdullah; Faiza M Abdul-Ameer
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2018-05-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.