Literature DB >> 20185238

Graded back pain revisited - do latent variable models change our understanding of severe back pain in the general population?

Carsten Oliver Schmidt1, Heiner Raspe, Thomas Kohlmann.   

Abstract

Back pain severity has extensively been targeted in clinical and epidemiologic studies. However, despite the importance of a valid pain severity grading its adequate conceptualization in the general population has received comparatively little attention. The potentially misleading influence of measurement error remains unclear. Latent variable models allow for a versatile assessment of disease severity and will be applied to propose a model-based grading of back pain. This cross-sectional postal survey was carried out in Germany between 2003 and 2004 to address back pain severity in the general adult population. 8756 subjects, aged 18-75 years, provided data on measures of pain intensity and disability. Latent class analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess and compare categorical and dimensional representations of back pain severity. The results show that beyond differences in their location on a severity continuum, the subjects did not report markedly different pain intensity/disability profiles. Our analyses disconfirmed the presence of a sizeable high pain intensity, low disability subgroup. A comparison of the different latent variable models yielded a usable classification into five severity subtypes. This classification showed statistically significant and clinically important associations to health-related variables. Our results confirm the high burden of back pain in the general population but suggest a different categorization of those with severe back pain. This entails consequences on how to best target this important health problem from a public health perspective. Copyright 2010 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20185238     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  5 in total

1.  [Back pain and social status among the working population: what is the association? Results from a German general population survey].

Authors:  C O Schmidt; J Moock; R A Fahland; Y Y-S Feng; T Kohlmann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Workers who stay at work despite chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: do they differ from workers with sick leave?

Authors:  Haitze J de Vries; Michiel F Reneman; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

3.  [Frequencies of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in the population-based German National Cohort (GNC)].

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jens Goronzy; Katinka Albrecht; Jean-François Chenot; Johanna Callhoff; Adrian Richter; Richard Kasch; Wolfgang Ahrens; Heiko Becher; Klaus Berger; Hermann Brenner; Beate Fischer; Claus-Werner Franzke; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Bernd Holleczek; Lina Jaeschke; Carsten Jenning; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Rudolf Kaaks; Thomas Keil; Alexander Kluttig; Gérard Krause; Oliver Kuß; Michael Leitzmann; Wolfgang Lieb; Jakob Linseisen; Markus Löffler; Claudia Meinke-Franze; Christa Meisinger; Karin B Michels; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Nadia Obi; Annette Peters; Tobias Pischon; Tamara Schikowski; Sabine Schipf; Christof Specker; Henry Völzke; Kerstin Wirkner; Angela Zink; Oliver Sander
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  A behavioral medicine intervention for older women living alone with chronic pain - a feasibility study.

Authors:  Sara Cederbom; Elisabeth Rydwik; Anne Söderlund; Eva Denison; Kerstin Frändin; Petra von Heideken Wågert
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Prevalence of benign osseous lesions of the spine and association with spinal pain in the general population in whole body MRI.

Authors:  Richard Kasch; Josephin Scheele; Mark Hancock; André Hofer; Christopher Maher; Robin Bülow; Jörn Lange; Andreas Lahm; Matthias Napp; Georgi Wassilew; Carsten Oliver Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.