OBJECTIVES: We describe the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous lead extraction in patients at a tertiary care center who had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram. BACKGROUND: Infection in the presence of intracardiac devices is a problem of considerable morbidity and mortality. Patients with intracardiac vegetations are at high risk for complications related to extraction and protracted clinical courses. Historically, lead extraction in this cohort has been managed by surgical thoracotomy. METHODS: We analyzed percutaneous lead extractions performed from January 1991 to September 2007 in infected patients with echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac vegetations, followed by a descriptive and statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 984 patients underwent extraction of 1,838 leads; local or systemic infection occurred in 480 patients. One hundred patients had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram, and all underwent percutaneous lead extraction (215 leads). Mean age was 67 years. Median extraction time was 3 min per lead; median implant duration was 34 months. During the index hospitalization, a new device was implanted in 54 patients at a median of 7 days after extraction. Post-operative 30-day mortality was 10%; no deaths were related directly to the extraction procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intracardiac vegetations identified on transesophageal echocardiogram can safely undergo complete device extraction using standard percutaneous lead extraction techniques. Permanent devices can safely be reimplanted provided blood cultures remain sterile. The presence of intracardiac vegetations identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for complications and early mortality from systemic infection despite device extraction and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: We describe the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous lead extraction in patients at a tertiary care center who had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram. BACKGROUND: Infection in the presence of intracardiac devices is a problem of considerable morbidity and mortality. Patients with intracardiac vegetations are at high risk for complications related to extraction and protracted clinical courses. Historically, lead extraction in this cohort has been managed by surgical thoracotomy. METHODS: We analyzed percutaneous lead extractions performed from January 1991 to September 2007 in infectedpatients with echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac vegetations, followed by a descriptive and statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 984 patients underwent extraction of 1,838 leads; local or systemic infection occurred in 480 patients. One hundred patients had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram, and all underwent percutaneous lead extraction (215 leads). Mean age was 67 years. Median extraction time was 3 min per lead; median implant duration was 34 months. During the index hospitalization, a new device was implanted in 54 patients at a median of 7 days after extraction. Post-operative 30-day mortality was 10%; no deaths were related directly to the extraction procedure. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with intracardiac vegetations identified on transesophageal echocardiogram can safely undergo complete device extraction using standard percutaneous lead extraction techniques. Permanent devices can safely be reimplanted provided blood cultures remain sterile. The presence of intracardiac vegetations identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for complications and early mortality from systemic infection despite device extraction and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Carlos Ortiz; Javier López; Héctor García; Teresa Sevilla; Ana Revilla; Isidre Vilacosta; Cristina Sarriá; Carmen Olmos; Carlos Ferrera; Pablo Elpidio García; Carmen Sáez; Itziar Gómez; José Alberto San Román Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 1.889