Literature DB >> 20182735

[Value-based medicine for glaucoma].

C Hirneiss1, A Kampik, A S Neubauer.   

Abstract

The application of value-based medicine (VBM) tenets in the area of glaucoma research requires valid and reliable data concerning the quality of life with glaucoma. A multitude of instruments for measuring quality of life of patients with glaucoma have been employed in the past. Any instrument used would need to capture peripheral vision loss and its influence on patient-reported quality of life as this is one of the hallmarks of this disease. Cost-utility analyses can then be based on the reported quality of life and the cost of glaucoma therapy. Several cost-utility analyses have been applied in the field of glaucoma screening as well as treating ocular hypertension and based on this a recommendation regarding population subgroups which can be treated cost efficiently can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20182735     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-009-2035-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  29 in total

1.  A utility analysis correlation with visual acuity: methodologies and vision in the better and poorer eyes.

Authors:  M M Brown; G C Brown; S Sharma; A F Smith; J Landy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

Review 3.  Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues.

Authors:  Florence Tubach; George A Wells; Philippe Ravaud; Maxime Dougados
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Utility values among glaucoma patients: an impact on the quality of life.

Authors:  V Gupta; G Srinivasan; S S Mei; G Gazzard; R Sihota; K S Kapoor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Mae O Gordon; Julia A Beiser; James D Brandt; Dale K Heuer; Eve J Higginbotham; Chris A Johnson; John L Keltner; J Philip Miller; Richard K Parrish; M Roy Wilson; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

6.  The impact of anchor point on utilities for 5 common ophthalmic diseases.

Authors:  Bryan S Lee; Steven M Kymes; Robert F Nease; Walton Sumner; Carla J Siegfried; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Evaluation of minimum clinically meaningful changes in scores on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) SST Report Number 19.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.648

8.  Utility assessment among patients of primary angle closure/glaucoma in China: a preliminary study.

Authors:  X Sun; S Zhang; N Wang; Y Liang; L Wang; S Fan; L Sun
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  [Measuring patient's quality of life in ophthalmology].

Authors:  C Hirneiss; A S Neubauer; U Welge-Lüssen; K Eibl; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 10.  Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D F Garway-Heath; F J Goñi; L Rossetti; B Bengtsson; A C Viswanathan; A Heijl
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].

Authors:  F Tonagel; B Voykov; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.